The Globalist from Nowhere: Making Governance Competitive in the International Environment

Public Administration Review

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-8

  Tolchin, Susan J ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011539968     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3110048     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anchordoguy, Marie, 1989. Computers Inc.: Japan's Challenge to IBM. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Council on East Asian Studies.
2. Auerbach, Stuart, 1991. "U.S. Relied on Foreign Made Parts for Weapons." Washington Post (March 25), A1, A17.
3. Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology and Government, 1991. Technology and Economic Performance. Washington, DC:
4. Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1989. Deterrence in Decay: The Future of the U.S. Defense Industrial Base. Washington, DC:, May.
5. Clinton, William Jefferson, 1991. A New Covenant for Economic Change. Speech delivered at Georgetown University on November 20.
6. Executive Office of the President. Office of Science and Technology Policy, 1991. Report of the National Critical Technologies Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7. Graham, Otis, 1992. Losing Time - The Industrial Policy Debate. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
8. Markoff, John, 1994. "A Declaration of Chip Independence." The New York Times (October 6), D1, D4.
9. Monopolies and Mergers Commission, 1988. The Government of Kuwait and the British Petroleum Company PLC: A Report on the Merger Situation. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry by Command of Her Majesty. Great Britain.
10. Porter, Roger, 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
11. Tolchin, Martin and Susan J. Tolchin, 1992. Selling Our Security - The Erosion of America's Assets. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
12. Tolchin, Susan J., 1993. "Halting the Erosion of America's Critical Assets." Issues in Science and Technology, vol. IX (Spring), no. 3, 65-72.
13. U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, Congressional Record, 1989. June 7. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, p. H 2391.
14. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1988. The Defense Technology Base. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. _, 1989. Holding the Edge: Maintaining the Defense Technology Base. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. _, 1990a. Arming Our Allies: Cooperation and Competition in Defense Technology. (May). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. _, 1990b. Arming Our Allies: Cooperation and Competition in Defense Technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. U.S. Congress, Senate, Congressional Record, 1989. May 16. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. S 5313 and 5346.
19. U.S. Department of Commerce, 1990. Emerging Technologies: A Survey of Technical and Economic Opportunities. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. U.S. Department of Defense, 1988a. Report to the Secretary of Defense by the Undersecretary of Defense (Acquisition). Bolstering Defense Industrial Competitiveness.
21. _, 1988b. Report of the Defense Science Board on the Defense Industrial and Technology Base.
22. U.S. Department of Defense, 1990. Defense Science Board. Critical Industries: A New Strategy for the Nation's Defense Industrial Base.
23. U.S. General Accounting Office, 1991. National Security and International Affairs Division. Industrial Base: Significance of DoD's Foreign Dependencies.