Comment on "very weak γ transitions in the ε/β+ decay of 68Ga"

Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 439-440

  Skalsey, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011534757     PISSN: 05562813     EISSN: 1089490X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.54.439     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. D. T. Vo, W. H. Kelly, F. K. Wohn, J. C. Hill, J. P. Vary, M. A. Delephanque, F. S. Stephens, R. M. Diamond, J. R. B. Oliveira, A. O. Macchiavelli, J. A. Becker, E. A. Henry, M. J. Brinkman, M. A. Stoyer, and J. E. Draper, Phys. Rev. C 50, 1713 (1994).
2. D. T. Vo et al., Phys. Rev. C 49, 1551 (1994).
3. M. Skalsey and J. J. Kolata, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 456 (1992).
4. M. R. Bhat, Nucl. Data Sheets 55, 1 (1988).
5. There exists one further systematic effect in the background calculation beyond the uncertainty in pileup resolving time. Because of limitations in recording timing information for high multiplicities, only double coincidences were analyzed in Ref. [1]. The selection effect on the background calculation is not easily extracted, recalling that each 511-keV photon is a member of a back-to-back pair.
6. Table of Isotopes, 7th ed., edited by C. M. Lederer and V. S. Shirley (Wiley, New York, 1978), pp. A21-A22.