Macroscopic molecular diffusion in liquid NMR, revisited

Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 79-88

  Jeener, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Anomalous diffusion; Bloch Torrey equations (magnetization); CRAZED experiment with diffusion; Molecular diffusion; Torrey equations (density operator)

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011514106     PISSN: 10437347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.10006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hahn EL. Spin echoes. Phys Rev 1950; 80:580-594.
2. Carr HY, Purcell EM. Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev 1954; 94:630-638.
3. Jeener J. Comment on "Diffusion measurements with the pulsed gradient nonlinear spin echo method" [I. Ardelean and R. Kimmich, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5275 (2000)]. J Chem Phys 2002; 116:1204-1205.
4. Kärger J, Pfeifer H, Vojta G. Time correlation during anomalous diffusion in fractal systems and signal attenuation in NMR field-gradient spectroscopy. Phys Rev A 1988; 37:4514-4517.
5. Torrey HC. Bloch equations with diffusion terms. Phys Rev 1956; 104:563-565.
6. Bodenhausen G, Vold RL, Void RR. Multiple quantum spin-echo spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 1980; 37:93-106.
7. Martin JF, Selwyn LS, Void RR, Void RL. The determination of translational diffusion constants in liquid crystals from pulsed field gradient double quantum spin echo decays. J Chem Phys 1982; 76:2632-2634.
8. Zax D, Pines A. Study of anisotropic diffusion of oriented molecules by multiple quantum spin echoes. J Chem Phys 1983; 78:6333-6334.
9. Ernst RR, Bodenhausen G, Wokaun A. Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1987.
10. Abragam A. The principles of nuclear magnetism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1961. 599 p. See p. 60.
11. Bloch F. Nuclear induction. Phys Rev 1946; 70:460-474.
12. Schneider DJ, Freed JH. Spin relaxation and motional dynamics. Adv Chem Phys 1989; 73:387-527.
13. See the last paragraph in Sec. III of Ref. 2.
14. Kimmich R. NMR tomography, diffusometry, relaxometry. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997. 526 p.
15. See the warning after Eq. [19.24] in Ref. 14.
16. Chandrasekhar S. Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy. Rev Mod Phys 1943; 15:1-89.
17. A misprint in Footnote 2 on p. 181 of Ref. 14 suggests the erroneous idea that a necessary condition for the validity of the central limit theorem is that all variables in the sum have the same probability distribution.
18. 3He. Phys Rev B 1979; 19:5666-5688.
19. Lee S, Richter W, Vathyam S, Warren WS. Quantum treatment of the effects of dipole-dipole interactions in liquid nuclear magnetic resonance. J Chem Phys 1996; 105:874-900. See pp. 891-893.
20. Jeener J. Collective effects in liquid NMR: dipolar field and radiation damping. In: Grant DM, Harris RK, editors. Supplement to the encyclopedia of nuclear magnetic resonance. Wiley (in press).
21. 2) must be inserted in the r.h.s of Eq. [14] and in the l.h.s. of Eq. [17] of this reference.
22. Warren WS Richter W, Andreotti AH, Farmer II BT. Generation of impossible cross-peaks between bulk water and biomolecules in solution NMR. Science 1993; 262:2005-2009.
23. Lee S, Richter W, Vathyam S, Warren WS. Quantum treatment of the effects of dipole-dipole interactions in liquid nuclear magnetic resonance. J Chem Phys 1996; 105:874-900.
24. Jeener J. Dynamical effects of the dipolar field inhomogeneities in high-resolution NMR: Spectral clustering and instabilities. Phys Rev Lett 1999; 82:1772-1775. Beware of some inconsistencies of notation in the discussion of Eq. [8] of this reference.
25. Einzel D, Eska G, Hirayoshi Y, Kopp T, Wölfe P. Multiple spin echoes in a normal Fermi liquid. Phys Rev Lett 1984; 24:2312-2315.