Re-engineering the OPAC using transaction logs

Libri

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 67-76

  Bangalore, Nirmala S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011403107     PISSN: 00242667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/libr.1997.47.2.67     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Borgman, CL. Why are online catalogs still hard to use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47 (1996); 7: 501.
2. Charming, RK. Looking back at the twentieth century. In: Blake, VLP. and Tjournas, R., eds. Information literacies for the twenty-first century. Boston: G.K. Hall, 1990: 454.
3. De la Pena McCook, K. Project Century 21: A background report responding to ALA 1991-1992 Council Document # 14. In: Project Century 21: A research and action program for meeting the information needs of society. Chicago: American Library Association, 1994: 4.
4. Delacroix, S. and Jenda, CA. Who is Gloria Stineman and why can't I find her on LUIS? In: Continuity & transformation: The promise of confluence: Proceedings of the seventh National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries. Chicago: American Library Association, 1995: 245.
5. Hildreth, C. Online Public Access Catalogs. Annual review of information science and technology 20 (1985); 246.
6. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47 (1996); 7.
7. Krikelas, J. Catalog use studies and their implications. In: Advances in librarianship. Chicago: American Library Association, 1973: 196.
8. Langenberg, DJ. Information technology and the university: Integration strategies for the 21st century. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45 (1994); 5: 323.
9. Library Hi Tech 11 (1993); 2.
10. Matthews, JR., Lawrence, GH. and Ferguson, DK. Using online catalogs: A nationwide survey. New York: Neal-Schuman, 1983.
11. Millson-Martula, C and Menon, V. Customer expectations: Concepts and reality for academic library services. College & research libraries 56 (1995); 1: 34.
12. Norden, DJ. and Lawrence, GH. Public terminal use in an online catalog: Some preliminary results. College & research libraries 42 (1981); 308-316.
13. Peters, T. Using transaction log analysis for library management information. Library administration & management 10 (1996); 1: 20.
14. Quint, B. Nature's way. Wilson library bulletin 69, (1994); Dec: 61.
15. Talwar, R. In: Coulson-Thomas, C. ed. Business process re-engineering: Myth & reality. London: K. Page, 1994: 40.
16. University of Illinois at Chicago. ILISAC Transaction Logs Task Force. User friendly? What do transaction logs reveal about OPACs? [In progress].
17. Van Houweling, DE. Knowledge services in the digitized world: Possibilities and strategies. In Electronic access to information: A new service paradigm. Mountain View, Calif.: RLG, 1993:15.
18. Vellucci, SL. Future catalogers: essential colleagues or anachronisms? College & research libraries news 57 (1996); 7: 442.
19. Weadock, GE. Exploding the computer myth. Essex Junction, Vt: Omneo, 1994: 401.
20. Weisel, T. The electronic library and the challenge of information planning. Academe (1989); July/August: 9.
21. Yee, MM. System design and cataloging meet the user: User interfaces to Online Public Access Catalogs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42 (1991); 2: 81.