Motive unmasked: The european court of justice, the free movement of goods, and the search for legitimacy

European Law Journal

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 226-250

  Friedbacher, Todd J ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011372816     PISSN: 13515993     EISSN: 14680386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.1996.tb00027.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alford, ‘Subsidiarity and Competition: Decentralized Enforcement of EU Competition Laws’. (1994) 27 Cornell International Law Journal 271.
2. Arnull, ‘Judging the New Europe’, (1994) 19 ELR.
3. Arnull, ‘Owning up to Fallibility: Precedent and the Court of Justice’, (1993) 30 CML Rev 247.
4. Arnull, ‘What Shall We Do on Sunday?', (1991) 16 ELRev 112.
5. Barents, ‘The Internal Market Unlimited: Some Observations on the Legal Basis of Community Legislation’, (1993) 30 CMLRev 85.
6. J. Bengoetxea., The Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice (Clarendon Press, 1993).
7. Berlin, ‘Interactions between the Lawmaker and the Judiciary within the EC’, (1992) 2 LIEI 17.
8. Bermann, ‘Subsidiarity and the European Community, ' (1993) 17 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 97.
9. Burley, ‘Democracy and Judicial Review in the European Community’, [1992] University of Chicago Legal Forum 81.
10. Cappelletti, ‘Is the European Court of Justice “Running Wild”?', (1987) 12 ELR 3.
11. Chalmers, ‘Repackaging the Internal Market-The Ramifications of the Keck Judgment’ (1994) 19 ELR 385.
12. Chalmers, ‘Free Movement of Goods within the European Community: An Unhealthy Addiction to Scotch Whisky?', (1993) 42 ICLQ 269.
13. Chung, ‘The Relationship between State Regulation and EC Competition Law: Two Proposals for a Coherent Approach, ' (1995) 2 ECL Rev 87.
14. Due, ‘The Practice of the European Court of Justice-A Factor in the Promotion of Integration’, (1992) 36 Scandinavian Studies in Law 77.
15. Editorial Comments, ‘Subsidiarity in EC Competition Law Enforcement’, (1995) 32 CMLRev 1.
16. Gibson and Caldeira, ‘The European Court of Justice: A Question of Legitimacy’, (1993) 14 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 204.
17. Gormley, lsquo;Report of Case 145/88, Torfaen Borough Council v B&Q PLC’, (1990) 27 CMLRev 141.
18. Gormley, ‘Recent Case Law on the Free Movement of Goods: Some Hot Potatoes’, (1990) 27 CMLRev 825.
19. Gormley, ‘ldquo;Actually or Potentially, Directly or Indirectly”? Obstacles to the Free Movement of Goods’, (1989) 9 YEL 197.
20. Gormley, ‘Some Reflections on the Internal Market and Free Movement of Goods’, (1989) LIEI 9.
21. Gulmann, ‘Methods of Interpretation of the European Court of Justice’, (1980) 24 Scandinavian Studies in Law 187.
22. Hatzopoulos, ‘Report of Case C-275/92, Her Majesty’s Customs and Excise v. Gerhart and Jörg Schindler, [1994] ECR 1-1039' (1995) 32 CMLRev 841.
23. Hawk, ‘The Treatment of Non-Territorial Vertical Restraints under EU and U.S. Competition Law’, paper presented to European Commission Directorate General IV, 8 December 1994.
24. A. Hirschman., Exit, Voice and Loyalty-Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States (Harvard University Press, 1970).
25. Jacqué and Weiler, ‘On the Road to European Union-A New Judicial Architecture: An Agenda for the Intergovernmental Conference’, (1990) 27 CMLRev 185.
26. Lenaerts, ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Environment in the European Union: Keeping the Balance of Federalism’, (1994) 17 Fordham International Law Journal 846.
27. Lenaerts and vanYpersele, ‘Le principe de subsidiarité et son contexte: Étude de l’article 3b de Traité CE’, (1994) CDE Nos. 1-2, 3.
28. Lenaerts, ‘Some Thoughts about the Interaction between Judges and Politicians in the European Community’, (1992) 12 YEL 1.
29. Mancini, ‘The Making of a Constitution for Europe’, (1989) 26 CMLRev 595.
30. Marquardt, ‘Deficit Reduction: Democracy, Technocracy, and Constitutionalism in the European Union’, (1994) 4 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 265.
31. Moore, ‘Re-visiting the Limits of Article 30 EEC’, (1994) 19 ELR 195.
32. Mortelmans, ‘Article 30 of the EEC Treaty and Legislation Relating to Market Circumstances: Time to Consider a New Definition?', (1991) 28 CMLRev 115.
33. H. Rasmussen., On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice (Martinus Nijhoff, 1986).
34. Reich, ‘The “November Revolution” of the European Court of Justice: Keck, Meng, and Audi Revisited’ (1994) 31 CMLRev 459.
35. Reich, ‘Competition between Legal Orders: A New Paradigm of EC Law?', (1992) 29 CMLRev 861.
36. Roth, ‘Report of Joined Cases C-267 and C-268/91, Keck and Mithouard; Case C-292/92, Hunermünd’ (1994) 31 CMLRev 845.
37. Roth, ‘Report of Case C-76/90, Manfred Säger, [1991] ECR I-4221' (1993) 30 CMLRev 145.
38. Shapiro, ‘Comparative Law and Comparative Politics’, (1980) 53 Southern California Law Review 537.
39. Slaughter, Burley., ‘New Directions in Legal Research on the European Community’, (1993) 31 JCMS 391.
40. Steiner, ‘Drawing the Line: Uses and Abuses of Article 30 EEC’, (1992) 29 CMLRev 749.
41. Stuyck, ‘Observations - L’ârret Keck et Mithouard (vente à perte) et ses conséquence sur la libre circulation des marchandises’, (1994) CDE Nos. 3-4, 435.
42. Todino and Lüder, ‘La jurisprudence “Keck” en matière de publicité: vers un marché unique inachevé?', (19941995) Revue du Marché Unique Européen 171.
43. Toth, ‘Is Subsidiarity Justiciable?', (1994) 19 ELR 268.
44. van der Woude, ‘The Limits of Free Circulation; the Torfaen Borough Council Case’, (1990) 3 Leiden Journal of International Law 57.
45. van Kersbergen and Verbeek, ‘The Politics of Subsidiarity in the European Union’, (1994) 32 JCMS 215.
46. Weatherill, ‘The Free Movement of Goods: A Survey of the Decisions of the Court of Justice in 1991', (1992) 17 ELR 421.
47. Weiler and Lockhart, ‘ldquo;Taking Rights Seriously” Seriously: The European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence-Part I’, (1995) 32 CMLRev 51.
48. Weiler, ‘Journey to an Unknown Destination: A Retrospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Arena of Political Integration’, (1993) 31 JCMS 417.
49. Weiler, ‘The Transformation of Europe’, (1991) 100 Yale LJ 2403.
50. Weiler, ‘Eurocracy and Distrust: Some Questions Concerning the Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of Fundamental Human Rights within the Legal Order of the European Communities’ (1986) 61 Washington Law Review 1103.
51. Weiler, ‘The Community System: The Dual Character of Supranationalism’, (1981) 1 YEL 273.
52. White, ‘In Search of the Limits to Article 30 of the EEC Treaty’, (1989) 26 CMLRev 235.
53. Wils, ‘The Search for the Rule in Article 30 EEC: Much Ado about Nothing?', (1993) 18 ELR 475.