Global equity styles and industry effects: The pre-eminence of value relative to size

Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 1-28

  Kuo, Weiyu ^a   E Satchell, Stephen ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

C51; Equity styles; Factor model; G11; G15; Market integration and segmentation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011372690     PISSN: 10424431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1042-4431(00)00033-0     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ammer J., Mei J. Measuring international economic linkages with stock market data. J. Finance. 51:1996;1743-1763.
2. Beckers S., Grinold R., Rudd A., Stefek D. The relative importance of common factors across the European equity markets. J. Bank. Finance. 16:1992;75-95.
3. Beckers, S., Connor, G., Curds, R., 1995, National versus global factors in equity returns, LSE Financial Markets Group, Working Paper.
4. Breen, W.J. Korajczyk, R.A 1995, On selection biases in book-to-market based tests of asset pricing models, Working Paper, Northwestern University.
5. Campbell J.Y., Hamao Y. Predictable stock returns in the US and Japan: A study of long-term capital market integration. J. Finance. 47:1992;43-69.
6. Capaul C., Rowley I., Sharpe W.F. International value and growth stock returns. Financ. Anal. J. 49:1993;27-36.
7. Connor G., Korajczyk R.A. A test for the number of factors in an approximate factor model. J. Finance. 48:1993;1263-1293.
8. Drummen M., Zimmermann H. The structure of European stock returns. Financ. Anal. J. 48:1992;15-26.
9. Fama E., French K. Industry costs of equity. J. Financ. Econom. 43:1997;153-193.
10. Fama E., French K. Value versus growth: the international evidence. J. Finance. 53:1998;1975-1999.
11. Ferson W., Harvey C.R. An exploratory investigation of the fundamental determinations of national equity market returns. Frankel J. The Internationalisation of Equity Markets. 1994;59-138 University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
12. Grinold, R., A. Rudd and D. Stefek, 1989, Global factors: fact or fiction?, J. Port. Manag. 79-88.
13. Gultekin M.N., Gultekin N.B., Penati A. Capital controls and international capital market segmentation: the evidence from the Japanese and American stock markets. J. Finance. 44:1989;849-869.
14. Hawawini G., Keim D.B. On the predictability of common stock returns: world-wide evidence. Jarrow R.A., Maksimovic V., Ziemba W.T. Handbooks in OR&MS. 9:1995;497-544 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
15. Heston S.L., Rouwenhorst K.G. Does industrial structure explain the benefits of international diversification? J. Financ. Econom. 36:1994;3-27.
16. Heston S.L., Rouwenhorst K.G., Wessels R.E. The Structure of international stock returns and the integration of capital markets. J. Emp. Finance. 2:1995;173-197.
17. Kennedy P. Interpreting dummy variables. Rev. Econom. Stat. 68:1986;174-175.
18. Lessard D.R. World, country and industry relationships in equity returns: Implications for risk reduction through international diversification. Financ. Anal. J. 32:1976;32-38.
19. MSCI, 1998 The Methodology and Index Manual of the MSCI Indices. 1998. Morgan Stanley.
20. 2. J. Finance. 43:1988;541-566.
21. Sharpe, W., 1992, Asset allocation: Management style and performance measurement, J. Port. Manag., 7-19.
22. Suits D.B. Dummy variable: Mechanics vs. interpretation. Rev. Econom. Stat. 66:1984;177-180.
23. Wheatley S. Some tests of international equity integration. J. Financ. Econom. 21:1988;177-212.
24. Yoon, Y., 1995, Value and growth stock returns revisited, Manuscript, Union Bank of Switzerland.