The tenure of the oppressed: Ambivalent reflections from a critical optimist

Computers and Composition

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 19-30

  Rickly, Rebecca ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Assistant professor; Evaluation; Guidelines; Junior faculty; Promotion; Reflection; Standards; Tenure

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011287181     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S8755-4615(99)00027-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. AAUP Committee on College and University Teaching, Research, and Publication. (1994), Jan/Feb). The work of faculty: Expectations, priorities, and rewards. Academe, 15-48.
2. ADE statement of good practice: Teaching, evaluation, and scholarship. (1993). ADE Bulletin, 105, 43-45.
3. Boyer Ernest L. Scholarship reconsidered. 1990;Carnegie Foundation, Princeton, NJ.
4. Elbow Peter. Embracing contraries Explorations in learning and teaching . 1986;Oxford University Press, New York.
5. Freire, Paulo. (1984). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (Myra Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
6. Gebhardt, Richard C. (1997). Mentor and evaluator: The chair's role in promotion and tenure review. In Richard C. Gebhardt & Barbara Genelle Smith Gebhardt (Eds.), Academic advancement in composition studies: Scholarship, publication, promotion, tenure (pp. 147-165). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
7. Gebhardt, Richard C. (1997). Preparing yourself for successful personnel review. In Richard C. Gebhardt & Barbara Genelle Smith Gebhardt (Eds.), Academic advancement in composition studies: Scholarship, publication, promotion, tenure (pp. 117-127). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
8. Glassick Charles E., Taylor Hubor Mary, Maeroff Gene I. Scholarship assessed Evaluation of the professoriate . 1997;Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
9. Hawisher Gail E., Selfe Cynthia L. The rhetoric of technology and the electronic writing class. College Composition and Communication. 42:1991;55-65.
10. Katz, Seth. (1997). One department's guidelines for evaluating computer-related work. Kairos: A Journal for Teachers of Writing in Webbed Environments, 2(1). Available: http://english. ttu.edu/kairos/2.1/coverweb/katz/art2.html.
11. Miller Scott L., Brueggermann Brenda Jo, Blue Bennis, Shepherd Deneen M. Present perfect and future imperfect Results of a national survey of graduate students in rhetoric and composition programs . College Composition and Communication. 48:(3):1997;392-409.
12. MLA Commission on Professional Service. (1996). Making faculty work visible: Reinterpreting professional service, teaching, and research in the fields of language and literature. Accepted by the MLA Executive Council, 1996.
13. National Council of Teachers of English Directory. (1999). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
14. Rickly Rebecca J. Making technology count Incentives, rewards, and evaluations . Howard Tharon, Benson Chris, Goswami Dixie, Gooch Rocky. Electronic networks Crossing boundaries/creating communities . 1998;225-238 Heinemann-Boynton Cook, Portsmouth, NH.
15. Taylor Todd W. The politics of electronic scholarship in rhetoric and composition. Olson Gary A., Taylor Todd W. Publishing in rhetoric and composition. 1997;197-209 State University of New York Press, New York.
16. Yagelski Robert P. The ambivalence of reflection Critical pedagogies, identity, and the writing teacher . College Composition and Communication. 51:(1):1999;32-50.