Specific and Nonspecific Solvation Contributions to Intervalence Electron Transfer Transitions and Redox Potentials in Ruthenium Ammine Complexes

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 25-32

  Drago, Russell S ^a   Richardson, David E ^a   George, James E ^a  

^a University of Florida ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011200599     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic960066o     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. (a) Reichardt, C. "Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry" 2nd Ed, VCH, Orlando, FL, 1988.
2. (b) Reichardt, C. Chem. Revs. 1994,
3. (a) Drago, R. S. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1992, 1827.
4. (b) Drago, R. S. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 6547.
5. Drago, R. S.; Hirsch, M. S.; Ferris, D. C.; Chronister, C. W. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 219.
6. Ferris, D. C.; Drago, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7509.
7. (e) Drago, R. S.; Kovala-Demertzi, D.; Ferris, D. C. J. Coord. Chem. 1994, 32, 145.
8. (f) Drago, R. S.; Ferris, D. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 6563.
9. (a) Drago, R. S. Applications of Electrostatic-Covalent Models in Chemistry; Surfside Scientific Publishers: Gainesville, FL, 1994.
10. (b) Drago, R. S.; Dadmun, A. P.; Vogel, G. C. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 2473.
11. Drago, R. S. Coord Chem. Rev. 1980, 33, 251.
12. See: Heitele, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 359 and references therein.
13. Weaver, M. J. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 463 and references therein.
14. Chang, J. P.; Fung, E. Y.; Curtis, S. C. Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 4233.
15. Goldsby, K. A.; Meyer, T. J. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 3002.
16. Powers, M. J.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 1289.
17. Curtis, J. C.; Sullivan, B. P.; Meyer, T. J. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 224.
18. Lau, K. W.; Hu, A. M.-H.; Yen, M. H.-J.; Fung, E. Y.; Grzybicki, S.; Matamoros, R.; Curtis, J. C. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994 226, 137.
19. (a) Riddle, F. L., Jr.; Fowkes, F. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3259.
20. (b) Lim, Y. Y.; Drago, R. S. Inorg. Chem. 1972, 11, 202.
21. IT for all solvents, this would imply that either the same number of solvent molecules are specifically interacting or that the number varies in a regular fashion with donor strength. Furthermore, the effect of coordinating the first and the following solvent molecules has the same proportionate influence on coordinating subsequent molecules in the second coordination sphere for all solvents.
22. Hupp, J. T.; Doug, Y.; Blackbourn, R. I.; Lu H. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 3278.
23. Blackbourn, R. L.; Hupp, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 2817.
24. Lowery, M. D.; Hammmack, W. S.; Drickamer, H. G.; Hendrickson, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 8019.
25. Powers, M. J.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 4393.
26. Stavrer, K. K.; Zerner, M. C.; Meyer, T. J. Private communication.