Increasing Efficiency to Meet Future Demand: Family Planning Services Provided by the Mexican Ministry of Health

International Family Planning Perspectives

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 119-124

  Hubacher, David ^a   Holtman, Matthew ^a   Fuentes, Miriam ^b   Perez Palacios, Gregorio ^b   Janowitz, Barbara ^a  

^a FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b Ministry of Public Health   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011171819     PISSN: 01622749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2991960     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Secretaría de Salud and Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO), Análisis de la Situación del Programa de Planificación Familiar Según Datos de la Encuesta Nacional de Planificación Familiar, Mexico City: Secretaría de Salud and CONAPO, 1996.
2. Ibid.
3. CONAPO, Situación de la Planificación Familiar en México: Indicadores de Anticoncepción, Mexico City: Pathfinder México, 1994.
4. Secretaría de Salud and CONAPO, 1996, op. cit. (see reference 1).
5. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Global Population Assistance Report 1995, New York: UNFPA, 1997.
6. John Snow International (JSI), Population Projects Database, Arlington, VA, USA: JSI, 1998.
7. Poder Ejecutivo Federal, Programa Nacional de Población, 1995-2000, Mexico City: CONAPO, 1995.
8. Janowitz B et al., Productivity and Costs for Family Planning Service Delivery in Bangladesh: The Government Program, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: Family Health International (FHI), 1996; and Janowitz B et al., Can the Bangladeshi family planning program meet rising needs without raising costs? International Family Planning Perspectives, 1997, 23(3):116-121.
9. Janowitz B et al., Productivity and Costs for Family Planning Service Delivery in Bangladesh: The Government Program, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: Family Health International (FHI), 1996; and Janowitz B et al., Can the Bangladeshi family planning program meet rising needs without raising costs? International Family Planning Perspectives, 1997, 23(3):116-121.
10. Secretaría de Salud, Dirección General de Salud Reproductiva, Clasificación de Estados Según Avance en el Programa de Planificación Familiar de la Secretaría de Salud, Mexico City: Secretaría de Salud, 1994.
11. Hubacher D et al., Family Planning Services at the Mexican Ministry of Health: Current Costs and Future Considerations, final report, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: FHI, July 1997.
12. CONAPO, Encuesta Nacional de Planificación Familiar (ENPF) 1995, database, Mexico City: CONAPO, 1996.
13. Poder Ejecutivo Federal, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 7).
14. Ibid.
15. Secretaría de Salud, Compilación de la Normatividad Laboral de la Secretaría de Salud, Mexico City: Secretaría de Salud, 1996.
16. Secretaría de Salud, Dirección General de Salud Reproductiva, Norma Oficial Mexicana de los Servicios de Planificación Familiar, Mexico City: Secretaría de Salud, 1993.
17. Seltzer JR, Lassner KJ and Yamashita SK, Midterm Program Review of the United States-Mexico Program of Collaboration on Population and Reproductive Health, POPTECH Report No. 96-083-049, Arlington, VA,USA: Population Technical Assistance Project, 1997.
18. Hatcher RA et al., The Essentials of Contraceptive Technology, Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins Schools of Public Health, Population Information Program, 1997.
19. Fort AL, More evils of CYP, Studies in Family Planning, 1996, 27(4):228-231; and Shelton JD, What's wrong with CYP? Studies in Family Planning, 1991, 22(5):332-335.
20. Fort AL, More evils of CYP, Studies in Family Planning, 1996, 27(4):228-231; and Shelton JD, What's wrong with CYP? Studies in Family Planning, 1991, 22(5):332-335.
21. Poder Ejecutivo Federal, Programa de Reforma del Sector Salud. Programa de Salud Reproductiva y Planificación Familiar, 1995-2000, Mexico City: Secretaría de Salud, 1996.