Mixed valence properties of a new binuclear complex, [(edtaH)RuIIINCRuII(CN)5]4- and kinetic studies of the aqua substitution reaction in RuIII(edta)(H2O)- by Ru(CN)4-6

Polyhedron

Volumn 16, Issue 21, 1997, Pages 3851-3855

  Bajaj, H C ^a   Das, Amitava ^a  

^a CSIR CENTRAL SALT AND MARINE CHEMICALS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Binuclear complexes; Kinetics; Mixed valence; Ruthenium; Synthesis; Thermochromism

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011103402     PISSN: 02775387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5387(97)00132-0     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Creutz, C., Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1983, 30, 1.
2. Hush, N. S., Coord. Chem. Rev., 1985, 64, 135.
3. Mikkelsen, K. V. and Ratner, M. A., Chem. Rev., 1987, 87, 113.
4. Fischer, F., Tom, G. M. and Taube, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98, 5512.
5. Carter, F. L. (Edt.), Molecular Electronics Devices, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1987 ; Aviram, A. (Edt.), Molecular Electronics : Science and Technology, Engineering Found, New York (1989).
6. (a) Brown, D. (Eds) Mixed-Valence Compounds, Reidel, Dordrecht (1980) ;
7. (b) Voglar, A., Osman, A. H. and Kunkley, H. C., Coord. Chem. Rev., 1985, 64, 159.
8. Powers, M. J. and Meyer, T. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 1289.
9. Hush, N. S., Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1967, 391, 8.
10. Ribou, A. C., Launay, J. P., Takahashi, K., Nibira, T., Tarutani, S. and Spangler, C. W., Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33, 1325.
11. (a) Das, A., Bajaj, H. C. and Chatterjee, D., Polyhedron, 1995, 14, 3585 ;
12. (b) Das, A. and Bajaj, H. C., Polyhedron, 1997, 16, 1023.
13. Chatterjee, D., Bajaj, H. C. and Das, A., Inorg. Chem., 1993, 32, 4049.
14. Chatterjee, D., Bajaj, H. C. and Das, A., Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1994, 224, 189.
15. Diamantis, A. A. and Dubrawski, J. V., Inorg. Chem., 1981, 20, 1142.
16. 1/2 by assuming the diffusion coefficients of reduced and oxidized species are almost same, i.e., the ratio is close to unity).
17. (a) Matsubara, T. and Creutz, C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 6255 ;
18. (b) Bajaj, H. C. and van Eldik, R., Inorg. Chem., 1988, 27, 4052.
19. Matsubara, T. and Creutz, C., Inorg. Chem., 1979, 18, 1956.
20. (a) Siddiqui, S., Henderson, W. W. and Shepherd, R. E., Inorg. Chem., 1987, 26, 3101 ;
21. (b) Burewick, A. and Haim, A., Inorg. Chem., 1988, 27, 1611 ;
22. Doon, S. K., Stoutland, P. O., Dyer, R. B. and Woodruff, W. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 3133.
23. (a) Vogler, A., Osman, A. H. and Kunkely, H., Inorg. Chem., 1987, 26, 2337 ;
24. (b) Curtis, J. C. and Meyer, T. J., Inorg. Chem., 1982, 21, 1562.
25. de Oliveira, L. A., Ciana, L. D. and Haim, A., Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1994, 225, 129.
26. Sharpe, A. G., The Chemistry of Cyano Complexes of the Transition Metals, Chap. VII, Academic Press, New York (1976).
27. Espenson, J. H. Chemical Kinetics and Reaction Mechanism, p 172 ; McGraw-Hill, New York (1981).
28. Marcus, R. A., J. Chem. Phys., 1965, 43, 679.
29. Hush, N. S., Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1967, 8, 391.
30. (a) Katz, N. E., Creutz, C. and Sutin, N., Inorg. Chem., 1988, 27, 1687 ;
31. (b) Fagalde, F. and Katz, N. E., Polyhedron, 1995, 14, 1213 ;
32. Haim, A., Comments Inorg. Chem., 1985, 4, 113.
33. Dong, Y. and Hupp, J. T., Inorg. Chem., 1992, 31, 3322.
34. rxn (reaction entropy).
35. Ying, W., Cohran, C. and Bocurshy, A. B., Inorg. Chim. Acta., 1994, 226, 251.
36. Hupp, J. T. and Weaver, M. J., Inorg. Chem., 1984, 23, 3639 and refs therein.
37. Hupp, J. T. and Dong, Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 6428.
38. The simple approach for calculating the electronic coupling on the basis of Hush model has been questioned in recent papers (e.g. : Westmoreland, T. D., Wilcox, D. E., Baldwin, M. J., Mims, W. B. and Solomon, E. I., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 6106. ; Dong, Y. and Hupp, J. T., Inorg. Chem., 1992, 31, 3170). A more sophisticated method has been described by Reimers and Hush (Inorg. Chem., 1990, 29, 3686; 4510), which is not very straight forward. Moreover former Hush treatment applies reasonably well to the present system where the electronic coupling is small. Thus we have used the former Hush method, which is simple, easily applicable to all compounds and allows comparisons.
39. The simple approach for calculating the electronic coupling on the basis of Hush model has been questioned in recent papers (e.g. : Westmoreland, T. D., Wilcox, D. E., Baldwin, M. J., Mims, W. B. and Solomon, E. I., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 6106. ; Dong, Y. and Hupp, J. T., Inorg. Chem., 1992, 31, 3170). A more sophisticated method has been described by Reimers and Hush (Inorg. Chem., 1990, 29, 3686; 4510), which is not very straight forward. Moreover former Hush treatment applies reasonably well to the present system where the electronic coupling is small. Thus we have used the former Hush method, which is simple, easily applicable to all compounds and allows comparisons.
40. The simple approach for calculating the electronic coupling on the basis of Hush model has been questioned in recent papers (e.g. : Westmoreland, T. D., Wilcox, D. E., Baldwin, M. J., Mims, W. B. and Solomon, E. I., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 6106. ; Dong, Y. and Hupp, J. T., Inorg. Chem., 1992, 31, 3170). A more sophisticated method has been described by Reimers and Hush (Inorg. Chem., 1990, 29, 3686; 4510), which is not very straight forward. Moreover former Hush treatment applies reasonably well to the present system where the electronic coupling is small. Thus we have used the former Hush method, which is simple, easily applicable to all compounds and allows comparisons.
41. op). Thus F = 0.97 for complex 1 signifies its valence localized nature.
42. Felix, A. and Ludi, A., Inorg. Chem., 1978, 17, 1782.