Managing increasing returns

European Management Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 370-378

  Den Hartigh, Erik ^a   Langerak, Fred ^b  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Competition; Increasing returns; Information; Knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010989505     PISSN: 02632373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0263-2373(01)00038-X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abrahamson E., Rosenkopf L. Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: a computer simulation. Organization Science. 8(3):1997;289-309.
2. Amit R. Cost leadership strategy and experience curves. Strategic Management Journal. 7:1986;281-292.
3. Arthur W.B. Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics. Anderson Ph.W., Arrow K.J., Pines D. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System. 1988;9-31 Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA.
4. Arthur W.B. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical small events. The Economic Journal. 99(March):1989;16-131.
5. Arthur W.B. Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard Business Review. 74(Jul-Aug):1996;100-109.
6. Arthur W.B., Lane D. Information contagion. Arthur W.B. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. 1994;The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
7. Burt R.S. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology. 92:1987;1287-1335.
8. Farrell J., Saloner G. Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. Rand Journal of Economics. 16(1):1985;70-83.
9. Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. American Economic Review. 76(5):1986;940-955.
10. Farrell J., Saloner G. Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 40(1):1992;9-35.
11. Feick L.F., Price L.L. The market maven: a diffuser of marketplace information. Journal of Marketing. 51(January):1987;83-97.
12. Funk J.L. Competition between regional standards and the success and failure of firms in the world-wide mobile communication market. Telecommunications Policy. 22(4-5):1998;419-441.
13. Glazer R. Marketing in an information-intensive environment: strategic implications of knowledge as an asset. Journal of Marketing. 55(October):1991;1-19.
14. Glazer R., Weiss A.M. Marketing in turbulent environments: decision processes and the time-sensitivity of information. Journal of Marketing Research. 30(November):1993;509-521.
15. Gupta S., Jain D.C., Sawhney M.S. Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: an application to digital television. Marketing Science. 18(3):1999;396-416.
16. Kaldor N. Causes of the slow rate of economic growth in the United Kingdom. Targetti F., Thirlwall A.P. The Essential Kaldor. 1966;282-310 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Katz M.L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review. 75(3):1985;424-440.
18. Katz M.L., Shapiro C. Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 8(2):1994;93-115.
19. Kelly K. New rules for the new economy: twelve dependable principles for thriving in a turbulent world. Wired. September:1997;140-197.
20. Kretschmer M., Klimis G.M., Choi C.J. Increasing returns and social contagion in cultural industries. British Journal of Management. 10:1999;S61-S72.
21. Scherer F.M., Ross D. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. 3rd edn:1990;Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
22. Schilling M.A. Technological lock-out: an integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Academy of Management Review. 23(2):1998;267-284.
23. Shapiro C., Varian H.R. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. 1998;Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
24. Shapiro C., Varian H.R. The art of standards wars. California Management Review. 41(2):1999;8-32.
25. Westphal J.D., Gulati R., Shortell S.M. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly. 42(2):1997;366-394.