Fixed position and property rights in sequential resource dilemmas under uncertainty

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 93, Issue 1-3, 1996, Pages 229-245

  Suleiman, Ramzi ^a   Rapoport, Amnon ^b   Budescu, David V ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Common dilemmas; Group decision making; Property rights; Sequential effects; Social dilemmas

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010966269     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(96)00008-x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bolton, G.E. and R. Zwick, 1995. Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior 10, 95-121.
2. Budescu, D.V., A. Rapoport and R. Suleiman, 1990. Resource dilemmas with environmental uncertainty and asymmetric players. European Journal of Social Psychology 20, 475-487.
3. Budescu, D.V., A. Rapoport and R. Suleiman, 1992. Simultaneous vs. sequential requests in resource dilemmas with incomplete information. Acta Psychologica 80, 297-310.
4. Budescu, D.V., A. Rapoport and R. Suleiman, 1995a. Common pool resource dilemmas under uncertainty: Qualitative tests of equilibrium solutions. Games and Economic Behavior 10, 171-201.
5. Budescu, D.V., R. Suleiman and A. Rapoport, 1995b. Positional order and group size effects in resource dilemmas with uncertain resources. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 61, 225-238.
6. Crawford, V.P., 1995. Theory and experiment in the analysis of strategic behavior. Paper presented at the Seventh World Congress of the Econometric Society, Tokyo, Japan.
7. Galanter, E., 1962. The direct measurement of utility and subjective probability. American Journal of Psychology 75, 208-220.
8. Galanter, E. and G.L. Hollman, 1967. Some invariances of the isosensitivity function and their implications for the utility function of money. Journal of Experimental Psychology 73, 333-339.
9. Güth, W., R. Schmittberger and B. Schwarze, 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3, 367-388.
10. Güth, W. and R. Tietz, 1986. 'Auctioning ultimatum bargaining positions'. In: R.W. Scolz (Ed.), Issues in West German Decision Research. Frankfurt: Lang.
11. Harrison, G. and J. Hirshleifer, 1989. An experimental evaluation of weakest-link/best-shot models of public goods. Journal of Public Economics 97, 201-225.
12. Hoffman, E., K. McCabe, K. Schachat and V. Smith, 1994. Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior 7, 346-380.
13. Hoffman, E. and M. Spitzer, 1982. The Coase theorem: Some experimental tests. Journal of Law and Economics 25, 73-98.
14. Hoffman, E. and M. Spitzer, 1985. Entitlement, rights, and fairness: An experimental examination of subjects' concepts of distributive justice. Journal of Legal Studies 15, 254-297.
15. Hogarth, R.M., 1987. Judgment and choice: The psychology of decision (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
16. Messick, D.M., H. Wilke, M.B. Brewer, R.M. Kramer, P.E. Zemke and L. Lui, 1983. Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, 294-309.
17. Myerson, R., 1991. Game theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Ostrom, E., J. Walker and R. Gardner, 1992. Covenants with and without a sword: Self governance is possible. American Political Science Review 86, 1-14.
19. Rapoport, A., D.V. Budescu and R. Suleiman, 1993. Sequential requests from randomly distributed shared resources. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 37, 241-265.
20. Rapoport, A., D.V. Budescu, R. Suleiman and E. Weg, 1992. 'Social dilemmas with uniformly distributed resources'. In: W.B.G. Liebrand, D.M. Messick and H.A.M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 43-57). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
21. Rapoport, A. and R. Suleiman, 1992a. Equilibrium solutions for resource dilemmas. Group Decision and Negotiation 1, 269-294.
22. Rapoport, A. and R. Suleiman, 1992b. 'Requests from commonly shared resources: A game-theoretical analysis'. In: Z. Shengkai and Z. Kaiqi (Eds.), International Conference on Information and Systems, 92 (pp. 534-543). Dalian, China: Dalian Marine University Publishing House.
23. Rapoport, A. and R. Suleiman, 1993. Incremental contribution in step-level public good games with asymmetric players. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 55, 171-194.
24. Rutte, C.G., H.A.M. Wilke and D.M. Messick, 1987. Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemma. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 23, 208-216.
25. Samuelson, C.D. and S.T. Allison, 1994. Cognitive factors affecting the use of social decision heuristics in resource-sharing tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 58, 1-27.
26. Samuelson, C.D. and D.M. Messick, 1986a. Alternative structural solutions to resource dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, 139-155.
27. Samuelson, C.D. and D.M. Messick, 1986b. Inequities in access to and use of shared resources in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 960-967.
28. Samuelson, C.D., D.M. Messick, C.G. Rutte and H.A.M. Wilke, 1984. Individual and structural solutions to resource dilemmas in two cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47, 94-104.
29. Suleiman, R., D.V. Budescu and A. Rapoport, 1994. 'The role of a player's position in a resource dilemma game'. In: U. Schulz, W. Albers and U. Mueller (Eds.), Social dilemmas and cooperation (pp. 55-73). New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Suleiman, R. and A. Rapoport, 1988. Environmental and social uncertainty in single-trial resource dilemmas. Acta Psychologica 68, 99-112.
31. Vickrey, W., 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and sealed tenders. Journal of Finance 16, 8-37.