Gender and Environmental: IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Agenda

Volumn 12, Issue 29, 1996, Pages 43-54

  Goudie, Simon ^a   Kilian, Darryll ^b  

^a UCT ^*  (South Africa)

^b UCT   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010904931     PISSN: 10130950     EISSN: 2158978X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10130950.1996.9675524     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Amner, R and Vergnani, L. 1995. ‘Findings of survey on financial situation of 128 nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) and community-based organisations (CBOs)’. Leading Edge, 4 Special Report Supplement, 1–6.)
2. Beattie, R B. 1995. ‘Everything you already know about EIA (but don't often admit)’. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15: 109–114.
3. Board of Investigation into the Saldhana Steel Committee. 1995. Submissions from Interested Parties (E Dalwai) 431–437.
4. Cock, J. 1994. ‘Sociology as if survival mattered’. SA Sociological Review, 6 (2): 14–31.
5. 1995. “ ‘A call for environmental legislation to be revised’ ”. In CSD Bulletin March, 5
6. Department of Environment Affairs. 1992. The Integrated Environmental Management Procedure—Guideline Document 1 Pretoria: Department of Environment Affairs.
7. Fowkes, S and Goudie, S. 1995. A Preliminary Assessment of the Current Practice of Interested and Affected Party Involvement in Environmental Decision Making in South Africa since the introduction of IEM report prepared for the HSRC and the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
8. Fowlkes, M R and Miller, P Y. 1987. “ ‘Chemicals and community at Love Canal’ ”. In The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk Edited by: Johnson, B B and Covello, V T. Chicago: Reidel Publishing Company.
9. Khan, F. 1990. ‘Involvement of the masses in environmental politics’. Veld and Flora, 76 (4): 36–38.
10. Kurian, P A. 1995. ‘Environmental Impact Assessment in practice: a gender critique’. The Environmental Professional, 17: 167–178.
11. Ortolano, L, Jenkins, B and Abracosa, R P. 1987. ‘Speculations on when and why EIA is effective’. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 7: 285–292.
12. Southern African Institute of Ecologists and Environmental Scientists. 1995. Register of Professional Members Maryland: SAIE&ES Secretariat.
13. Walmsley, J. 1993. Directory of Environmental Expertise in South Africa Pretoria: Foundation for Research Development.