The multivoiced classroom interactions of writing and classroom discourse

Written Communication

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 385-425

  Dysthe, Olga ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010892683     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088396013003004     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson and M. Holquist, Trans.)- Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (D. Emerson, Ed. and Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (C. Emerson and M. Holquist, Eds. and Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Bakhtin, M. M., & Medvedev, P. N. (1978). Formal method of literary scholarship. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
5. Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. London: Penguin.
6. Bellack, A. A., Kliebard, H. M., Hyman, R, & Smith, F. L. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Brandt, D., & Nystrand, M. (1989) Response to writing as a context for learning to write. In C. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
8. Britton, J. (1970,1991). Language and learning. London: Penguin.
9. Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities (11-18). London: Macmillan.
10. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
11. Dysthe, O. (1990). Writing and talking in classrooms-A key to learning in content areas? Tromse linguistics in the eighties. Oslo, Norwary: Novus.
12. Dysthe, O. (1993). Writing and talking to leant. An interpretive study of three classrooms in the USA and Norway (Report 1 /93 APPU). Tromso, Norway: University of Tromso.
13. Dysthe, O. (1995). Del flerstemmige kksserommet [The multivoiced classroom]. Oslo, Norway: AdNotam/Gyldendal.
14. Evensen, L. S., Halse, M., Hoel, T. L., Lorentzen, R. T., Moslet, I., & Smidt, J. (1991). Development of writing competence. Research and knowledge challenges (Report No. 1 from the project SKRIVE-PUFF, Development of writing competence, SESAM, ALLFORSK). Trondheim, Norway: University of Trondheim.
15. Farnham-Diggory, S. (1994). Paradigms of knowledge and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 64,463-477.
16. Gee, G. P. (1989). Orality and literacy: From The Savage Mind to Ways With Words. Journal of Education, 171, (1).
17. Gere, A. R. (1987). Writing groups. History, theory and implications. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
18. Gustafsson, C. (1977). Classroom interaction: A study of pedagogical roles in the teaching process. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute of Education.
19. Halse, M. E. (1992). A process-oriented writing culture-A feminine culture? Norskhereren,4,22-23.
20. Halse, M. E. (1993). The girls, the log and the short story. A Bakhtinian reading of a process-oriented writing culture (Report No. 11 from SKRIVE-PUFF, Development of writing competence, SESAM, ALLFORSK). Trondheim, Norway: University of Trondheim.
21. Hickman, J., & Kimberley, K. (1988). Teachers, language and learning. London: Routledge.
22. Hoel, T. L. (1994). Elevsamtalar om skriving i vidaregaande skole. Responsgrupper i teori og praksis [High school student conversations about writing. Response groups in theory and practice]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Trondheim, Norway.
23. Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London: Routledge.
24. Langer, J., & Applebee, A. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of writing and teaching. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
25. Linell, P., & Luckman, T. (1991). Assymmetries in dialogue: Some conceptual preliminaries. In I. Markova &K. Foppa (Eds.), Assymmetries in dialogue. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
26. Lotman, Y. M. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 24(3), 32-51.
27. Lotman, Y. M. (1990). Universe of the mind. A semiotic theory of culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
28. Lundgren, U. P. (1981). Alt organisera omvärlden, En introduktion til läroplansteori [Organizing the world around us: An introduction to curriculum theory]. Stockholm: Liber.
29. Macrorie, K. (1984). Searching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
30. Markova, I. (1992). On Structure and dialogicity in Prague semiotics. In A. H. Wold (Ed.), The dialogical alternative. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
31. Markova, I., & Poppa, K. (Eds.). (1990). The dynamics of dialogue. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
32. Markova, I., & Poppa, K. (Eds.). (1991). The assymelries of dialogue. Hemel Hemstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
33. Martin, N., D'Arcy, P., Newton, B., & Parker, R (1976). Writing and learning across tlte curriculum. London: Ward Lock Educational.
34. Martin, N., Williams, P., Wilding, I., Hemmings, S., & Medway, P. (1976). Understanding children talking. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
35. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Medway, P. (1980). Finding a language: Autonomy and learning in school. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.
38. Newell, G. N. (1984). Learning from writing in the content areas. Research in the Teaching of English, 18,265-287.
39. Newell, G. N., & Winograd, P. (19S9). The effects of writing from expository texts. Written Communication, 6,196-217.
40. Nystrand, M. (1991, April). On the negotiation of understanding between students and teachers: Toivards a social-interactive model ofscliool learning. Paper presented at the Convention of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
41. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991a). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25,261-290.
42. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991b). Student engagement: When récitation becomes conversation. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
43. Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academy Press.
44. Rommetveit, R (1974). On message structure. New York: John Wiley.
45. Simons, E. R, & McDonald, A. (1991). Can extensive use of writing to learn clumge the academic self-image of inner city minority students? Paper presented at the Annual Convention of National Council of Teachers of English, Seattle.
46. Smidt, J. (1988). Six readers at school (Doctoral dissertation, University of Trondheim, Norway). Oslo, Norway: University Press.
47. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in tlieory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
48. Sweigart, W. (1991). Classroom talk, knowledge development, and writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25,469-496.
49. Todorov, T. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin: The dialogicalprindple (W. Godzich, Trans.). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
50. Torbe, M., & Medway, P. (1981). A climate for learning. London: Ward Lock Educational.
51. Volosinov, V., & Bakhtin, M. M. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka & I. R Titunik, trans.). New York: Seminar.
52. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thought and language (A. Kouzulin, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Wertsch, J. (1992). A dialogue on message structure: Rommetveit and Bakhtin. In A. H. Wold (Ed.), The dialogical alternative. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
54. Wertsch, J., & Toma, C. (1995). Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sodocultural approach. In L. Steffe (Ed.), Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Witte, S. P. (1992). Context, text, intertext. Towards a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9.
56. Wold, A. H. (Ed.). (1992). The dialogical alternative. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.