The Use of Evidence in Presidential Debates: A Study of Evidence Levels and Types from 1960 to 1988

Argumentation and Advocacy

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 129-142

  Levasseur, David ^a   Dean, Kevin W ^b  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010754320     PISSN: 10511431     EISSN: 25768476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.1996.11977986     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aristotle. The “Art” of Rhetoric. Trans. John Henry Freese. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1926.
2. Bitzer, Lloyd, and Theodore, Rueter. Carter vs. Ford: The Counterfeit Debates of 1976. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1980.
3. Bryski, Bruce G., “An Analysis of Evidence in the First Ford/Carter Debate.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 6 (1978): 19–30.
4. “Bush and Dukakis, Face to Face on Key Issues.” Congressional Quarterly Almanac: 100th Congress: 2nd Session.… 1988 Washington: Congressional Quarterly, 1989. 91-A–101-A.
5. “Bush and Dukakis: Few Sparks in Final Clash.” Congressional Quarterly Almanac: 100th Congress: 2nd Session.… 1988 Washington: Congressional Quarterly, 1989. 102-A–112-A.
6. Carlin, Diana Prentice. “A Defense of the ‘Debate’ in Presidential Debates.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 25 (1989): 208–13.
7. Chaffee, Steven H., “Presidential Debates—Are They Helpful to Voters.” Communication Monographs 45 (1978): 330–46.
8. Chaffee, Steven H., and Jack, Dennis. “Presidential Debates: An Empirical Assessment.” The Past and Future of Presidential Debates. Ed. Austin, Ranney. Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 1979. 75–101.
9. Cheney, Richard B., “The 1976 Presidential Debates: A Republican Perspective.” The Past and Future of Presidential Debates. Ed. Austin, Ranney. Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 1979. 107–30.
10. Cohen, Richard. “A Man in Hiding.” Washington Post 16 Oct. 1988: C7.
11. Depoe, Stephen P., and Cady, Short-Thompson. “Let the People Speak: The Emergence of Public Space in the Richmond Presidential Debate.” The 1992 Presidential Debates in Focus. Eds. Diana B., Carlin and Mitchell S., McKinney. Westport: Praeger, 1994. 85–98.
12. Diamond, Edwin, and Kathleen, Friery. “Media Coverage of Presidential Debates.” Presidential Debates: 1988 and Beyond. Ed. Joel L., Swerdlow. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Inc., 1987. 43–51.
13. Eizenstat, Stuart, and Michael, Raoul-Duval. “Candidate Briefings.” The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976. Ed. Sidney, Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1979. 105–9.
14. Ellsworth, John W., “Rationality and Campaigning: A Content Analysis of the 1960 Presidential Campaign Debates.” Western Political Quarterly 18 (1965): 794–802.
15. “The First Debate, September 26, 1960.” The Great Debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960: A Reissue. Ed. Sidney, Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1962. 348–68.
16. “The First Ford-Carter Debate: Walnut Street Theater, Philadelphia: September 23, 1976, 9:30 p.m.” The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976. Ed. Sidney, Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1979. 453–75.
17. Fisher, Jack Lawler. “An Experimental Study of the Relationship Between Ego-Involvement and Different Types of Evidence in Persuasion.” Diss. Louisiana State U, 1972.
18. Harte, Thomas B., “The Effects of Evidence in Persuasive Communication.” Central States Speech Journal 27 (1976): 42–46.
19. Harte, Thomas B., “The Effects of Initial Attitude and Evidence in Persuasive Communications.” Thesis. U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1972.
20. Hellweg, Susan A., Michael, Pfau, and Steven R., Brydon. Televised Presidential Debates: Advocacy in Contemporary America. New York: Praeger, 1992.
21. Highlander, John P., and Lloyd, Watkins. “A Closer Look at the Great Debates.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 26 (1962): 39–48.
22. Holsti, Ole R., Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
23. Howe, Keith R., “The Relative Persuasiveness of Evidential Matter.” Diss. Arizona State U, 1979.
24. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and David S., Birdsell. Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York: Oxford UP, 1988.
25. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos, Tversky. “On the Psychology of Prediction.” Psychological Review 80 (1973): 237–51.
26. Karayn, James. “The Case for Permanent Presidential Debates.” The Past and Future of Presidential Debates. Ed. Austin, Ranney. Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 1979. 155–68.
27. Katz, Elihu, and Jacob J., Feldman. “The Debates in the Light of Research: A Survey of Surveys.” The Great Debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960: A Reissue. Ed. Sidney, Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1962. 173–223.
28. Kellerman, Kathy. “The Concept of Evidence: A Critical Review.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 16 (1980): 159–72.
29. Kirkpatrick, Samuel A., William, Lyons, and Michael R., Fitzgerald. “Candidates, Parties and Issues in the American Electorate: Two Decades of Change.” American Politics Quarterly 3 (1975): 247–83.
30. Kraus, Sidney. “Presidential Debates in 1964.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 50 (1964): 19–23.
31. Kraus, Sidney, and Dennis K., Davis. “Political Debates.” Communication Yearbook 6. Ed. Michael, Burgoon. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1982. 273–96.
32. Kraus, Sidney, and Raymond G., Smith. “Issues and Images.” The Great Debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960: A Reissue. Ed. Sidney, Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1977. 289–312.
33. Lemert, James B., William R., Elliott, James M., Bernstein, William L., Rosenberg, and Karl J., Nestvold. News Verdicts, the Debates, and Presidential Campaigns. New York: Praeger, 1991.
34. Lichtenstein, Allen. “Differences in Impact Between Local and National Televised Political Candidates' Debates.” The Western Journal of Speech Communication 46 (1982): 291–98.
35. Lubell, Samuel. “Personalities vs. Issues.” The Great Debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960: A Reissue. Ed. Sidney, Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1977. 151–62.
36. Martel, Myles. “Debate Preparation in the Reagan Camp: An Insider's View.” Speaker and Gavel 18.2 (1981): 34–46.
37. Martel, Myles. Political Campaign Debates: Images, Strategies, and Tactics. New York: Longman, 1983.
38. McCroskey, James C., “The Effects of Evidence in Persuasive Communication.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 31 (1967): 189–99.
39. McCroskey, James C., “A Summary of Experimental Research on the Effects of Evidence in Persuasive Communication.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 55 (1969): 169–76.
40. McGrory, Mary. “The Duke Didn't Do It.” Washington Post 16 Oct. 1988: C1+.
41. Meadow, Robert G., “A Speech by any Other Name.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 4 (1987): 207–10.
42. Meadow, Robert G., and Marilyn, Jackson-Beeck. “A Comparative Perspective on Presidential Debates: Issue Evolution in 1960 and 1976. The Presidential Debates: Media, Electoral, and Policy Perspectives. Ed. George F., Bishop, Robert G., Meadow and Marilyn Jackson-Beeck. New York: Praeger, 1978. 33–58.
43. Miller, Arthur H., and Michael, MacKuen. “Informing the Electorate: A National Study.” The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976. Ed. Sidney, Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1979. 269–97.
44. Nadler, Marjorie Ann. “Evidence Usage in Persuasion.” Diss. U of Kansas, 1982.
45. Nimmo, Dan, and Robert L., Savage. Candidates and Their Images. Pacific Palisades: Goodyear Publishing, 1976.
46. Nisbett, Richard E., and Eugene, Borgida. “Attribution and the Psychology of Prediction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (1975): 932–43.
47. Petty, Richard E., and John T., Cacioppo. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
48. Polsby, Nelson W., “Debatable Thoughts on Presidential Debates.” The Past and Future of Presidential Debates. Ed. Austin, Ranney. Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 1979. 175–86.
49. “Reagan-Mondale Debate on Domestic Issues.” Congressional Quarterly 42 (1984): 2656–66.
50. Reinard, John C., “The Empirical Study of the Persuasive Effects of Evidence: The Status After Fifty Years of Research.” Human Communication Research 15 (1988): 3–59.
51. Riley, Patricia, and Thomas A., Hollihan. “The 1980 Presidential Debates: A Content Analysis of the Issues and Arguments.” Speaker and Gavel 18.2 (1981): 47–59.
52. Ritter, Kurt, and David, Henry. “The 1980 Reagan-Carter Presidential Debate.” Rhetorical Studies of National Political Debates. Ed. Robert V., Friedenberg. New York: Praeger, 1990. 69–94.
53. Rowland, Robert. “The Substance of the 1980 Carter-Reagan Debate.” Southern Speech Communication Journal 51 (1986): 142–65.
54. Ryland, Edwin Holman. “Information Input and Performance in Small Decision Making Groups.” Diss. Louisiana State U, 1972.
55. Samovar, Larry A., “Ambiguity and Unequivocation in the Kennedy-Nixon Television Debates: A Rhetorical Analysis.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 29 (1965): 211–18.
56. Sears, David O., and Steven H., Chaffee. “Uses and Effects of the 1976 Debates: An Overview of Empirical Studies” The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976. Ed. Sidney, Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1979. 223–59.
57. Shales, Tom. “A Bush Edge in the Final Conflict.” Washington Post 14 Oct. 1988: B1+.
58. Stevens, William K., “Presidential Debate Scored Low Rating in a Cleveland Bar.” New York Times 25 Sep. 1976, late ed.: A9.
59. Stiff, James B., “Cognitive Processing of Persuasive Message Cues: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Supporting Information on Attitudes.” Communication Monographs 53 (1986): 75–89.
60. Swanson, Linda L., and David L., Swanson. “The Agenda-Setting Function of the First Ford-Carter Debate.” Communication Monographs 45 (1978): 347–53.
61. Taylor, Shelley E., and Suzanne C., Thompson. “Stalking the Elusive ‘Vividness’ Effect.” Psychological Review 89 (1982): 155–81.
62. Thompson, Wayne. The Process of Persuasion: Principles and Readings. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
63. Vancil, David L., and Sue D., Pendell. “Winning Presidential Debates: An Analysis of Criteria Influencing Audience Response.” The Western Journal of Speech Communication 48 (1984): 62–74.
64. Wayne, Stephen J., The Road to the White House: The Politics of Presidential Elections. 3rd. ed. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1988.
65. Weiss, Robert O., “The Presidential Debates in their Political Context: The Issue-Image Interface in the 1980 Campaign.” Speaker and Gavel 18.2 (1981): 22–27.
66. “When Their Power Failed.” Time 4 Oct. 1976: 14–18.