|
|
Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 10-28
|
|
Sex selection and disability avoidance: is their opposed treatment conceptually consistent?
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ABORTION;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
ARTICLE;
CLASSIFICATION;
DISABILITY;
DISABLED PERSON;
ETHICS;
FEMALE;
GENDER IDENTITY;
GENETIC ENGINEERING;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HEALTH;
HUMAN;
MALE;
PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
SEX DETERMINATION;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;
ABORTION, EUGENIC;
DISABILITY EVALUATION;
DISABLED PERSONS;
ETHICAL ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
GENDER IDENTITY;
HEALTH;
HUMANS;
MALE;
PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS;
PREJUDICE;
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;
SEX DETERMINATION (ANALYSIS);
SEX PRESELECTION;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
|
|
EID: 0010715256
PISSN: 13212753
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/BF03351264 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (1)
|
|
References (0)
|
