Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on-campus and distance learning practice: An exploratory investigation

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 87-111

  Tenenbaum, Gershon ^a   Naidu, Som ^b   Jegede, Olugbemiro ^c   Austin, Jon ^d  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Constructivism; Higher education; Instructional design

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010665857     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00017-7     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brown J.S., Collins A., Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher. 18:1989;32-42.
2. Candy P.C. Self direction for long life learning. 1991;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
3. Driver R. Theory into practice II: a constructivist approach to curriculum development. Fensham P.J. Development and dilemmas in science education. 1988;165-188 The Falmer Press, London.
4. Freire P. Pedagogy of the oppressed. 1970;Continuum, New York.
5. von Glaserfeld E. Learning as constructive activity. von Glaserfeld E. The construction of knowledge: contributions to conceptual semantics. 1987;212-214 Intersystems Publication, California.
6. Jonassen D.H. Objectivism versus constructivism: do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development. 39:1991;5-14.
7. Lai-Chong, L., & Wong, K. (1995). Implications and problems of constructivism for instructional design. Education Journal (Hong Kong), 23, 73-104 (cited in Educational Administration Abstracts, 32(3), 301, July 97).
8. Lai-Chong, L., & Wong, K. (1995). Implications and problems of constructivism for instructional design. Education Journal (Hong Kong), 23, 73-104 (cited in Educational Administration Abstracts, 32(3), 301, July 97).
9. Lunenberg F.C. Constructivism and technology: instructional designs for successful education reform. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 25:1998;75-82.
10. O'Donnell A.M. Constructivism by design and in practice: a review. Issues in Education. 3:1997;285-294.
11. Spigner-Littles D.A., Chalon E. Constructivism: a paradigm for older learners. Educational Gerontology. 25:1999;203-210.
12. Steffe L., Gale J. Alternative epistemologies in education. 1995;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
13. Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction. 4:1994;295-312.
14. Taylor, P. C. S. (1990). The influence of teacher beliefs on constructivist teaching practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, USA.
15. Tennyson R.D. An educational learning theory for instructional design. Educational Technology. 32:1992;36-41.
16. Tobin, K. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on research in science education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research on Science Teaching, Lake Geneva, WI, USA.
17. Wagner E.D., McCombs B.L. Learner centre psychological principles in practice: designs for distance education. Educational Technology. 35:1995;32-35.
18. Wheatley G.H. The role of negotiation in mathematics learning. Tobin K. The practice of constructivism in science education. 1993;121-133 AAAS Press, Washington, DC.