Influence diagnostic in survey sampling: Conditional bias

Biometrika

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 923-928

  Moreno Rebollo, J L ^a   Munoz Reyes, A ^a   Munoz Pichardo, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010628987     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/86.4.923     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. COOK, R. D. (1987). Influence assessment. J. Appl. Statist. 14, 117-31.
2. GWET, J. P. & RIVEST, L. P. (1992). Outlier resistant alternatives to the ratio estimator. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 87, 1174-82.
3. HAMPEL, F. R., RONCHETTI, E. M., ROUSSEEUW, P. J. & STAHEL, W. A. (1986). Robust Statistics. New York: Wiley.
4. HORVITZ, D. G. & THOMPSON, D. J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 47, 663-85.
5. HULLIGER, B. (1995). Outlier robust Horvitz-Thompson estimators. Survey Methodol. 21, 79-87.
6. KISH, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley.
7. MUÑOZ-PICHARDO, J., MUÑOZ-GARCIA, J., MORENO-REBOLLO, J. L. & PINO-MEJIAS, R. (1995). A new approach to influence analysis in linear mdoels. Sankhyā A 57, 393-409.
8. SAMPFORD, M. R. (1967). On sampling without replacement with unequal probabilities of selection. Biometrika 54, 499-513.
9. SMITH, T. M. F. (1987). Influential observations in survey sampling. J. Appl. Statist. 14, 143-52.