Socioeconomic Reach and Heterogeneity in the Extended Family: Contours and Consequences

Social Science Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 382-404

  Goldstein, Joshua R ^a   Warren, John Robert ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010586149     PISSN: 0049089X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ssre.2000.0676     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bonvalet C. Proches et parents. Population. 48:1993;83-110.
2. Campbell K. E., Marsden P. V., Hurlbert J. S. Social resources and socioeconomic status. Social Networks. 8:1986;97-117.
3. Davis J. A., Smith T. W. The NORC General Social Survey. 1992;Sage, Newbury Park.
4. Eckland B. K. Theories of mate selection. Eugenics Quarterly. 15:1968;71-84.
5. Fischer C. S. To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. 1982;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. Goldstein J. The Demography of Family and Kinship in an Age of Divorce and Remarriage. 1996;University of California, Berkeley.
7. Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology. 78:1973;1360-1380.
8. Granovetter M. S. Getting A Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. 1974;Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
9. Hauser R. M., Warren J. R. Socioeconomic indexes of occupational status: A review update, and critique. Raftery A. Sociological Methodology 1997. 1997;177-298 Blackwell, Cambridge.
10. Jasso G. Methods for the theoretical and empirical analysis of comparison processes. Raftery A. Sociological Methodology 1990. 1990;369-419 Blackwell, Cambridge.
11. Kalmijn M. Trends in black/white intermarriage. Social Forces. 72:1993;119-145.
12. Lin N., Ensel W. M., Vaughn J. C. Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review. 46:1981;393-405.
13. Long J. S. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences. 1997;Sage, Newbury Park.
14. Marsden P. V. Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review. 52:1987;122-131.
15. Massey D. S., Denton N. A. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. 1993;Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
16. Milgram S. The small-world problem. Psychology Today. 1:1967;62-67.
17. Nakao K., Treas J. Updating occupational prestige and socioeconomic scores: How the new measures measure up. Marsden P. Sociological Methodology 1994. 1994;1-72 American Sociological Association, Washington.
18. Schneider D., Cottrell C. B. The American Kin Universe: A Genealogical Study. 1975;University of ChicagoDepartment of Anthropology.
19. Simmel G. The Web of Group Affiliations. [1908] 1955;Free Press, New York.
20. Stack C. All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community. 1974;Harper and Row, New York.
21. Stouffer, S, and coauthors, 1949, The American Soldier, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
22. The 1994 Study of American Families: Codebook and Appendices. 1997;University of Wisconsin-Madison.
23. Travers J., Milgram S. An experimental study of the small-world problem. Sociometry. 32:1969;425-443.
24. Warren J. R., Sheridan J. T., Hauser R. M. Choosing a measure of occupational standing: How useful are composite measures in analyses of gender inequality in occupational attainment? Sociological Methods and Research. 27:1998;3-76.
25. Weber, M. [1922] 1968, Economy and Society, Bedminister, New York.