A blackboard database model of the design planning process in concurrent engineering

Cybernetics and Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 755-774

  Reidsema, C ^a   Szczerbicki, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010582956     PISSN: 01969722     EISSN: 10876553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/019697201317080952     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bundy, A. (Ed.). 1997. Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A Comprehensive Catalogue. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
2. Buschmann, F., R. Meunier, H. Rohnert, P. Sommerlad, and M. Stal. 1996. Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Craig, I. D. 1992. Blackboard Systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
4. Duffy, A. H. B., M. M. Andreasen, K. J. MacCallum, and L. N. Reijers. 1993. Design coordination for concurrent engineering. Journal of Engineering Design 4:251-265.
5. Englemore, R., and T. Morgan. 1988. Blackboard Systems. New York: Addison-Wesley.
6. Molina, A., A. H. Al-Ashaab, T. I. A. Ellis, R. I. M. Young, and R. Bell. 1995. A review of computer-aided simultaneous engineering systems. Research in Engineering Design 7:38-63.
7. Nii, H. P. 1986. Blackboard systems: The blackboard model of problem solving and the evolution of blackboard architectures. The AI Magazine, Summer:38-106.
8. Prasad, B. 1995. Is planning a strategic requirement for CE success? Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 3:164-166.
9. Prasad, B. 1996. Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals: Integrated Product Development, Vol II. New York: Prentice-Hall.
10. Reidsema, C., and E. Szczerbicki. 1997. Towards a system for design planning in a concurrent engineering environment. International Journal of Systems Analysis, Modelling, and Simulation 29:301-320.
11. Reidsema, C., and E. Szczerbicki. 1998. Blackboard approach in design planning for concurrent engineering environment. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 29:729-750.
12. Reidsema, C., and E. Szczerbicki. 1999a. Support for planning in concurrent engineering. In Second International Conference on Managing Enterprises: Stakeholders, Engineering, Logistics & Achievement, November 18-20, Newcastle, Australia, pp. 73-78.
13. Reidsema, C., and E. Szczerbicki. 1999b. Modelling design planning in concurrent engineering. In Proc 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Processing and Manufacturing of Materials, July 10-15, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 1055-1060.
14. Simon, H. A. 1977. Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving. In Models of Discovery, 265-338. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
15. Subramanian, E., G. Podnar, and A. Westerberg. 1990. A Shared Computational Environment for Concurrent Engineering. The Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
16. Szczerbicki, E., and C. Reidsema. 1999. Modelling support in concurrent engineering environment. In Proc. Second World Manufacturing Congress, September 27-30, University of Durham, U.K., 289-294