Phase diagram on the anisotropic quantum and classical Heisenberg models

Solid State Communications

Volumn 115, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 265-268

  De Sousa, J R ^a   Araujo I G ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF AMAZONAS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RORAIMA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIFERROMAGNETISM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTAL LATTICES; FERROMAGNETISM; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PHASE DIAGRAMS; QUANTUM THEORY;

CLASSICAL HEISENBERG MODEL;

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS;

EID: 0010548819     PISSN: 00381098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0038-1098(00)00137-X     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Shirane G., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59:1987;613.
2. Endoh Y., et al. Phys. Rev. B. 37:1988;7443.
3. Aeppli G., et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62:1989;2052.
4. Anderson P.W. Science. 235:1987;196.
5. de Sousa J.R. Physica A. 256:1998;383.
6. de Sousa J.R., Araújo I.G. J. Mag. Mag. Mat. 202:1999;231.
7. J.R. de Sousa, unpublished results.
8. de Sousa J.R., Plascak J.A. Phys. Lett. A. 237:1997;66.
9. de Sousa J.R., Araújo I.G., Plascak J.A. Physica A. 2000;. (in press).
10. Rushbrooke G.S., Wood P.J. Mol. Phys. 11:1967;409.
11. Ying H.P., et al. Phys. Lett. A. 183:1995;441.
12. Li H., Cheng T.L. Phys. Rev. B. 52:1995;15 979.
13. Mano H. J. Mag. Mag. Mat. 90-91:1990;281.
14. Araújo I.G., Neto J.C., de Sousa J.R. Physica A. 260:1998;150.
15. Indekeu J.O., Maritan A., Stella A.L. J. Phys. A. 15:1982;L291.
16. Patrap A., Ajay, Tripathi R.S. Phys. Status Solidi B. 197:1996;787.
17. Singh R.P., Tao Z.C., Singh M. Phys. Rev. B. 46:1992;1244.
18. Singh R.P., Tao Z.C., Singh M. Phys. Status Solidi B. 179:1993;539.
19. Liu B.G. J. Phys. Cond. Mater. 4:1992;8339.
20. Liu B.G. Phys. Rev. B. 41:1990;9563.
21. Liu B.G. J. Phys. Cond. Mater. 2:1990;6007.
22. Soukoulis C.M., Datta S., Lee Y.H. Phys. Rev. B. 44:1991;446.
23. Xue W., et al. Phys. Rev. B. 38:1988;6868. (In this work the simulations was treated in the classical Heisenberg model, therefore (see Ref. (5)) the static properties are invariant by change of sign of J by -J in the hamiltonian, i.e. the F and AF system presents same thermodynamical and criticality.).
24. Plascak J.A. J. Phys. A. 17:1984;L597. (In this paper the influence of the interlayer parameter λ was not analyzed, but to treat of this problem substitute d by 2+λ).
25. de Souza A.M.C. Phys. Rev. B. 48:1993;3744.
26. -1 with n=3 (classical Heisenberg limit) and d=2+λ to obtain the critical line (dotted curve) in Fig. 1 of this present paper.).