End user training: An experimental comparison of lecture versus computer-based training

Journal of End User Computing

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 14-27

  Bohlen, George A ^a   Ferratt, Thomas W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010416386     PISSN: 10632239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Ament, L. (1990). Learning and Training: A Matter of Style. Industrial and Commercial Training, 22(3),13-16.
2. Billings, D.M., & Cobb, K.L. (1992). Effects of Learning Style Preferences, Attitude and GPA on Learner Achievement Using Computer Assisted Interactive Videodisc Instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 79(1), 12-16.
3. Bodi, S. (1990). Teaching Effectiveness and Bibliographic Instruction: The Relevance of Learning Styles. College & Research Libraries, 51(2), 113-119.
4. Bostrom, R.P., Olfman, L., & Sein, M.K. (1990). The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training. MIS Quarterly, 14(1), 100-119.
5. Bostrom, R.P., Oilman, L., & Sein, M.K. (1993). Learning Styles and End User Training: A First Step. MIS Quarterly, 77(1), 118-120.
6. Bowman, B.J., Grupe, F.H., & Simkin, M.G. (1995). Teaching End-User Applications with Computer-Based Training: Theory and an Empirical Investigation. Journal of End User Computing, 7(2), 12-18.