Electronic outlining as a tool for making writing visible

Computers and Composition

Volumn 14, Issue 3 SPEC ISS, 1997, Pages 409-427

  Price, Jonathan ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom; Collaboration; Composition; Construction; Conversation; Electronic outline; Outlining; Social; Software; Technical; Writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010395408     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s8755-4615(97)90009-8     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Adelson N., Jordan T. The need for negotiation in cooperative work. Barrett E. Sociomedia: Multimedia, hypermedia, and the social construction of knowledge. 1992;469-492 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Allen N., Atkinson D., Morgan M., Moore T., Snow C. What experienced collaborators say about collaborative writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 1:(2):1987;70-90.
3. Apple M.W. Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. 1986;Routledge and Kegan Paul, New York.
4. Apple Computer. Apple human interface guidelines: The Apple desktop interface. 1987;Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
5. Baker William H. How to produce and communicate structured text. Technical Communication. 41:1994;456-466.
6. Bakhtin Mikhail M. The dialogic imagination. 1981;University of Texas Press, Austin.
7. Bakhtin Mikhail M. Speech genres and other late essays. V.W. McGee, Trans. Emerson C., Holquist M. 1986;University of Texas Press, Austin.
8. Bakhtin Mikhail M., Volosinov V.N. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. 1929/1986;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. (L. Matejka & I. Titunik, Trans.).
9. Balestri D.P. Softcopy and hard: Word processing and writing process. Academic Computing. 14:(17):1988;41-45.
10. Barrett Edward, Paradfis James. Teaching writing in an on-line classroom. Harvard Education Review. 58:1988;154-171.
11. Bazerman Charles. Constructing experience. 1994;Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.
12. Beach Richard. Self-evaluation strategies of extensive reviewers and non-revisers. College Composition and Communication. 34:1976;297-312.
13. Bell Daniel. The social framework of the information society. Dertouzos M., Moses J. The computer age: A twenty-year view. 1975;163-211 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Bernhardt Stephen A. Seeing the text. College Composition and Communication. 37:1986;66-78.
15. Betreiter C., Scardamalia M. The psychology of written composition. 1987;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
16. Bleich David. Collaboration and the pedagogy of disclosure. College English. 57:(1):1995;43-61.
17. Bolter Jay David. Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. 1990;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
18. Bridwell Lillian S. Revising strategies in twelfth grade students' transactional writing. Research in the Teaching of English. 14:1980;197-222.
19. Bruffee Kenneth A. Collaborative learning and 'the conversation of mankind.'. College English. 46:1984;635-652.
20. Bruffee Kenneth A. A short course in writing. 1985;Little, Brown, Boston.
21. Bruffee Kenneth A. Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge. College English. 48:1986;773-790.
22. Burnett Rebecca E. Conflict in collaborative decision-making. Blyler Nancy R., Thralls Charlotte. Professional communication: The social perspective. 1993;144-162 Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
23. Coe Richard M. Outline later. Journal of Advanced Composition. 1:1980;86-88.
24. Coe Richard M. An apology for form: Or, who took form out of the process? College English. 49:1987;13-28.
25. Coles William E. Jr. The dialogues of teaching: Learning to listen. Composition Studies. 12:1991;34-46.
26. Cooper Marilyn M., Selfe Cynthia L. Computer conferences and learning: Authority,resistance, and internally persuasive discourse. College English. 52:1990;847-869.
27. Costanzo William. Reading, writing, and thinking in an age of electronic literacy. Selfe Cynthia L., Hilligoss Susan. Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. 1994;11-21 MLA, New York.
28. Couture Barbara, Rymer Jone. Interactive writing on the job: Definitions and implications of collaboration. Kogen M. Writing in the business professions. 1989;73-93 National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL.
29. Crawford Wayne. Common-sense outline processing. Library Hi-Tech. 16:1989;63-77.
30. Daiute Collette. Writing and computers. 1985;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
31. Davis Richard M. How important is technical writing? A survey of the opinions of successful engineers. Technical Writing Teacher. 4:(1):1977;83-88.
32. Duin Ann Hill. Computer-supported collaborative writing: The workplace and the writing classroom. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 5:(2):1991;123-150.
33. Duin Ann Hill, Burnett Rebbeca. Collaboration in technical communication: A research continuum. Technical Communication Quarterly. 2:(1):1993;5-21.
34. Duin Ann Hill, Hansen Craig. Reading and writing on computer networks as social construction and social interaction. Selfe Cynthia L., Hilligoss Susan. Literacy and Computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. 1994;89-112 MLA, New York.
35. Ede Lisa, Lunsford Andrea. Why write... together: A research update. Rhetoric Review. 5:(1):1986;71-81.
36. Ede Lisa, Lunsford Andrea. Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. 1990;Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.
37. Eldred Janet M. Computers, composition pedagogy, and the social view. Hawisher Gail E., Selfe Cynthia L. Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction. 1989;201-218 Teachers' College Press, New York.
38. Emig Janet. The composing processes of twelfth graders. Research Report No. 13. 1971;National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL.
39. Enos Richard L. Ciceronian dispositio as an architecture for creativity in composition: A note for the affirmative. Rhetoric Review. 4:1985;108-110.
40. Faigley Lester, Miller Thomas. What we learn from writing on the job. College English. 44:1982;557-569.
41. Faigley Lester, Witte Stephen. Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication. 32:1981;400-414.
42. Farkas David. Four research issues. 42:1995;587-589. Technical Communication.
43. Fitschen K. Effective advice to beginning writers: Revise the hard copy. Teaching English in the Two-Year College. 13:(2):1986;104-108.
44. Flower Linda, Hayes J. Robert. Problem-solving strategies and the writing process. College English. 39:1977;449-461.
45. Flower Linda, Hayes J. Robert. The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. Gregg L., Steinberg E. Cognitive processes in writing. 1980;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
46. Flower Linda, Hayes J. Robert. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication. 32:1981a;365-387.
47. Flower Linda, Hayes J. Robert. Plans that guide the composing process. Frederiksen C.H., Dominic J. Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication. Vol. 2:1981b;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
48. Flower Linda, Hayes J. Robert. Images, plans, and prose: The representation of meaning in writing. 1:1984;120-160. Written Communication.
49. Flower Linda, Hayes J. Robert, Carey L., Schriver Karen, Stratman J. Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication. 37:1986;16-55.
50. Flower Linda, Stein V., Ackerman John, Kantz M., McCormick K., Peck W. Reading-to-write: Exploring a cognitive and social process. 1990;Oxford University Press, New York.
51. Forman Janis. Novices work on group reports: Problems in group writing and in computer supported group writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 5:(1):1991;48-75.
52. Haas Christine. How the writing medium shapes the writing process: Effects of word processing on planning. Research in the Teaching of English. 23:1989;181-207.
53. Halliday Michael A.K. Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. 1975;Edward Arnold, London.
54. Halliday Michael A.K. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. 1978;University Park Press, Baltimore.
55. Harris Muriel. Composing behaviors of one- and multi-draft writers. College English. 51:1989;174-191.
56. Hartwell P. Teaching arrangement: A pedagogy. College English. 40:1979;548-554.
57. Hawisher Gail E. Research and recommendations for computers and composition. Hawisher Gail E., Selfe Cynthia L. Critical perspectives on computers and composition: Teaching and research in the virtual age. 1989;44-69 Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth.
58. Hawisher Gail E. Connecting the visual and the verbal. Wresch Willaim. Lessons for the computer age. 1991;129-132 National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana.
59. Hawisher Gail E. Blinding insights: Classification schemes and software for literacy instruction. Selfe Cynthia L., Hilligoss Susan. Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. 1994;37-55 MLA, New York.
60. Hawisher Gail E., Selfe Cynthia L. Critical perspectives on computers and composition: Teaching and research in the virtual age. 1992;Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth, NH.
61. Hayes J. Robert, Flower Linda. Identifying the organization of writing processs. Gregg L., Steinberg E. Cognitive processes in writing. 1980;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
62. Hays Robert. Model outlines can make routine writing easier. 23:1982;4-8. Technical Communication.
63. Hillocks Geore. Research on written composition. 1986;National Conference on Research on English and ERIC, Urbana, IL.
64. Hult Christine, Harris Jenette. A writer's introduction to word processing. 1987;Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
65. Humphrey D. Computers and collaboration: Writing as a social skill. Assembly on Computers in English Newsletter. 3:1987.
66. Hutchins E., Hollan J., Norman D. Direct manipulation interfaces. Norman D., Draper S.W. User-centered design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. 1986;87-124 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
67. Irish P.M., Trigg R.H. Supporting collaboration in hypermedia: Issues and experiences. Barrett Edward. The society of text: Hypertext, hypermedia, and the social construction of knowledge. 1989;93-106 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
68. Johnson-Eilola Johndan. Reading and writing in hypertext: Vertigo and euphoria. Selfe Cynthia L., Hilligoss Susan. Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. 1994;195-219 MLA, New York.
69. Joyce Michael. Siren shapes: Exploratory and constructive hypertexts. Academic Computing. 1988, November;10-15.
70. Kaplan Nancy. Ideology, technology, and the future of writing instruction. Hawisher Gail E., Selfe Cynthia L. Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies: Questions for the 1990s. 1991;11-42 National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL.
71. Kaplan Nancy, Moulthrop Stuart. Seeing through the interface: Computers and the future of composition. Landow George, Delany Paul. The digital word: Text-based computing in the humanities. 1993;253-270 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
72. Kaufer David S., Fleming D., Werner M., Sinsheimer-Weeks A. Collaborative argument across the visual-verbal interface. Technical Communication Quarterly. 2:(1):1993;37-49.
73. Kellogg R.T. Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 14:(2):1988;355-365.
74. Kiesler S., Siegel J., McGuire T. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Greif I. Computer-supported cooperative work. 1988;657-682 Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA.
75. Knoblauch C.H., Brannon Lil. Rhetorical traditions and the teaching of writing. 1984;Boynton, Upper Montclair, NJ.
76. Kostelnick Charles. Process paradigms in design and composition: Affinities and directions. College Composition and Communication. 40:1989a;267-281.
77. Kostelnick Charles. Visual rhetoric: A reader-oriented approach to graphics and designs. The Technical Writing Teacher. 16:1989b;77-88.
78. Kostelnick Charles. Typographical design, modernist aesthetics, and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 4:1990;5-24.
79. Kostelnick Charles. From pen to print: The new visual landscape of professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 8:1994;91-117.
80. Kostelnick Charles. Supra-Textual design: The visual rhetoric of whole documents. Technical Communication Quarterly. 5:1996;9-34.
81. Kremers M. Sharing authority on a synchronous network: The case for riding the beast. Kremers M., Peyton J.K. Papers from the fifth Computers and Writing Conference. Computers and Composition. vol. 7:1990;33-44. Special issue.
82. Kuhlthau C.C. Longitudinal case studies of the information search process of users in libraries. Library & Information Science Research. 10:1988;257-304.
83. Landow George P. Hypertext: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. 1992;Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
84. Landow George P., Paul Delany. The digital word: Text-based computing in the humanities. 1993;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
85. Lanham Richard. Foreword. Handa C. Computers and community: Teaching composition in the twenty-first century. 1990;xiii-xv Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth, NH.
86. Loehr L. Composing in groups: The concept of authority in cross-functional project teamwork. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 38:1995;83-94.
87. Mabrito Mark. Real-time computer network collaboration: Case studies of business writing students. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 6:(3):1992;316-336.
88. Mager R.F. Making instruction work, or skillbloomers. 1988;Lake, Belmont, CA.
89. McKee B.K. Do writers use an outline when they write? Technical Communication. 19:1972;10-13.
90. McKee B.K. Types of outlines used by technical writers. Journal of English Teaching Techniques. 7:1974/75;30-36.
91. Mischel T. A case study of a twelfth grade writer. Research in the Teaching of English. 8:1974;303-314.
92. Moberg G. Writing on computers in English composition. 1986;Writing Consultant, New York.
93. Moran Charles. The computer-writing room: Authority and control. Computers and Composition. 7:1990;61-69.
94. Nelson J. Constructing a research paper: A study of students' goals and approaches. Tech Report No. 59. 1992;University of California, Center for the Study of Writing, Berkeley, CA.
95. Newell A., Simon H.A. Human problem-solving. 1972;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
96. Olsen L.A. Computer-based writing and communication: Some implications for technical communication activities. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. 19:1989;97-118.
97. Perl Sondra. The composing processes of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English. 13:1979;317-336.
98. Pianko S.H. A description of the composing processes of college freshman writers. Research in the Teaching of English. 13:1979;5-22.
99. Plumb C. What can technical writers learn from good conversation? Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. 20:(2):1990;201-209.
100. Plung D.L. The advantages of sentence outlining. 29:1982;8-11. Technical Communication.
101. Podis L.A. Teaching arrangement: Defining a more practical approach. College Composition and Communication. 31:1980;197-204.
102. Podis J.M., Podis L.A. Identifying and teaching rhetorical plans for arrangement. College Composition and Communication. 41:1990;430-442.
103. Price Jonathan. How do writers really collaborate? 1PCC 92 Conference Record. 1992;460-463.
104. Price Jonathan, Korman H. How to communicate technical information. 1993;Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
105. Price Jonathan, Urban Linda. The definitive word - processing book. 1984;Penguin, New York.
106. Rodrigues Dawn, Rodrigues Raymond. Teaching writing with a word processor. 1986;National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL.
107. Rogers R.L. Preparing course materials with an outline processor. Teaching of Psychology. 13:1986;154-155.
108. Rude Carolyn D. Format in instructional manuals: Applications of existing research. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 2:1988;63-77.
109. Ruskiewicz J. Word and image: The next revolution. Computers and Composition. 5:1988;9-16.
110. Rymer J. Collaboration and conversation in learning communities: The discipline and the classroom. Blyler Nancy R., Thralls Charlotte. Professional communication: The social perspective. 1993;179-195 Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
111. Schank Robert, Abelson R. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. 1977;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
112. Schneider M.L. Collaborative learning: A concept in search of a definition. Issues in Writing. 3:(1):1990;26-39.
113. Schwartz Helen. Interactive writing: Composing with a word processor. 1985;Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
114. Selber Stuart A. Metaphorical perspectives on hypertext. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 38:1995;59-67.
115. Selfe Cynthia L., Hilligoss Susan. Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. 1994;MLA, New York.
116. Shneiderman Ben. Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages. IEEE Computer. 16:1983;57-69.
117. Shneiderman Ben. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. 1992;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
118. Smith Catherine F. Hypertextual thinking. Selfe Cynthia L., Hilligoss Susan. Literacy and Computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. 1994;264-281 MLA, New York.
119. Sommers Nancy, McQuade D. Student writers at work: The Bedford prizes. 1984;St. Martin's Press, New York.
120. Stallard C. An analysis of the behavior of good student writers. Research in the Teaching of English. 8:1974;206-218.
121. Stein V. Exploring the cognition of reading-to-write. Flower Linda, Stein V., Ackerman J., Kantz M.J., McCormick K., Peck W.C. Reading-to-write: Exploring a cognitive and social process. 1990;119-143 Oxford, New York.
122. Stotsky Sandra. On planning and writing plans - Or beware of borrowed theories! College Composition and Communication. 41:1990;37-57.
123. Taylor B.M., Beach Richard W. The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students' comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly. 19:(2):1984;134-136.
124. Tuman Myron C. Wordperfect: Literacy in the computer age. 1992;University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
125. Vygotsky Lev. Thought and Language. Hanfmann E. 1962;MIT Press, Cambridge. G. Vakar, Trans.
126. Wagner B.J. An easy outlining approach for producing solidly structured, audience-directed reports. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 8:1994;475-482.
127. Walvoord B.E., Anderson V.J., Breihan J.R., McCarthy L.P., Robison S.M., Sherman A.K. Functions of outlining among college students in four disciplines. Research in the Teaching of English. 29:1995;390-421.
128. Warriner J.E., Mersand J., Griffith F. English grammar and composition. 1958;Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
129. Witte Stephen F. Pre-text and composing. College Composition and Communication. 38:1987;397-425.
130. Witte Stephen F. Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. 9:(2):1992;237-308. Written Communication.
131. Young Robert L. A dialogue user interface architecture. Sullivan J.W., Tyler S.W. Intelligent User Interfaces. 1991;157-176 ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
132. Zuboff Shoshana. In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. 1988;Basic, New York.