Determining the importance of US convention destination attributes

Journal of Vacation Marketing

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 211-220

  Chacko, Harsha E ^a   Fenich, George G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS   (United States)

Author keywords

conventions; destination attributes; meeting planners; meetings and trade shows

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010334390     PISSN: 13567667     EISSN: 14791870     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/135676670000600302     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Meetings Market Report. Secaucus, NJ.: Cahners Travel Group; 1998:.
2. Meetings, Conventions, and Expositions: An Introductions to the Industry. New York: Von Nostrand Reinhold; 1995:.
3. Influencing associations' site selection process.Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly. 1995;36 (2): 61-68.
4. Convention site selection research: A review, conceptual model, and propositional framework.Journal of Convention and Exhibition Management. 1998;1 (1): 48-69.
5. An empirical study of association decision processes in convention site selection.Journal of Travel Research. 1977;15 (4): 13-20.
6. Convention destination images: Analysis of association meeting planners' perceptions.Tourism Management. 1996;17 (3): 175-182.
7. Promoting tourism in U.S. cities.Tourism Management. 1995;16 (3): 175-187.
8. Local heroes.Report on Business Magazine. 1995; (February): 72-78.
9. Conventionl and USA: The geography of a latter day phenomenon.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1994;84 (March 1): 68-86.
10. Conference, Convention and Exhibition Facilities. London: Architectural Press; 1991:.
11. Quality service issues: a mulitvariate analysis of association meeting planner perceptions of Caribbean destinations.Hospitality Research Journal. 1994;19 (1): 29-48.
12. Perceptions of convention destinations: large half versus small half association meeting planners.Journal of Convention and Exhibition Management. 1998;1 (1): 35-48.
13. Checklist: Site selection.Meetings and Conventions. 1993;28 (5): 135-136.
14. Choosing a convention center.Meetings and Conventions. 1986; (November): 58-69.
15. Canadian survey shows how Associations select a convention site.Association Management. 1977; (February): 45-47.
16. The meetings market report.Meetings and Conventions. 1988; (April): 83-85.
17. How to choose a meeting city.Association Management. 1995; (February 14): 91-98.
18. Site score.Successful Meetings. 1990; (July): 246.
19. Report on a comprehensive five-year gambling impact research plan in New Orleans.Journal of Travel Research. 1996;34 (3): 97-100.
20. New Orleans Qualitative Study Report. Princeton, NJ: Gallup; 1997:.
21. The 25 most active convention cities in North America.Meeting News. 1995; (April): 14-22.
22. Conventions as mega-events.Tourism Management. 1995;16 (5): 375-379.
23. The pros and cons of second tier cities.Convene. 1994;IX (1): 32-37.