Transboundary cooperation on germany's borders: Strategic regionalism through multilevel governance

Journal of Borderlands Studies

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 143-167

  Scott, James Wesley ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010278948     PISSN: 08865655     EISSN: 21591229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2000.9695545     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bache, Ian. 1999. “The Extended Gatekeeper: Central Government and the Implementation of EU Regional Policy in the UK.”. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(1): 28–45.
2. Barjak, Franz. 1997. “Wirtschaftliche Lage und Regionalpolitik in den ‘Grenzräumen’ der neuen Bundesländer.”. Forschungsreihe des IWH, 5: 29–134.
3. Baun, Michael. J., 1996. An Imperfect Union. The Maastricht Treaty and the New Politics of European Integration, Boulder and Oxford: Westview Press.
4. Blatter, Joachim. 1999. “Entgrenzung der Staatenwelt? Politische Institutionenbildung in grenzüberschreitenden Regionen in Europa und Nordamerika.”. St. Gallen, Switzerland: Department of Political Science, University of St. Gallen. Ph.D. diss.
5. Church, Andrew, and Reid, Peter. 1996. “Urban Power, International Networks and Competition: The Example of Cross‐Border Co‐operation.”. Urban Studies, 33(8): 1279–1318.
6. Duchacek, Ivo. 1986. “International Competence of Subnational Governments: Borderlands and Beyond.”. In Across Boundaries. Transborder Interaction in Comparative Perspective, Edited by: Martínez, Oscar J., 11–28. El Paso: Texas Western Press.
7. Gabbe, J., 1992. “Institutionelle Aspekte der grezüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit.”. In Grenzübergreifende Raumplanung: Erfahrungen und Perspektiven der Zusammenarbeit mit den Nachbarstaaten Deutschlands, Edited by: Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung. 174–86. Hannover: Verlag der ARL.
8. Ganster, Paul, Sweedler, Alan, Scott, James, and Eberwein, Wolf‐Dieter, eds. 1997. Borders and Border Regions in Europe and North America, San Diego: Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias and San Diego State University Press.
9. Eskelinen, Heikki, Liikanen, Ilkka, and Oksa, Jukka, eds. 1999. Curtains of Iron and Gold. Reconstructing Borders and Scales of Interaction, Aldershot: Ashgate.
10. Euregio. 1992. Geschäftsbericht 1991, Gronau: Euregio.
11. European Commission. 1992. Interreg II Directive, Document 94/C180/13, Brussels: EU Commission.
12. European Commission. “Europa 2000: Spatial Perspectives of European Integration.”. Paper prepared for the informal working session of Ministers responsible for regional policy and planning. November12–13, Liege, Belgium.
13. European Commission. 1994. Europe 2000+: Co‐operation for European Territorial Development, Luxembourg: European Commission.
14. European Commission. 1996. First Report on Economic and Social Cohesion, Luxembourg: European Commission.
15. European Commission. 1999. European Spatial Development Perspective, Luxembourg: European Commission.
16. European Parliament (Committee on Regional Policy). 1997. Report on Transboundary and Inter‐Regional Co‐operation, Strasbourg: EU Parliament.
17. Hassink, Robert, Dankbaar, Baart, and Corvers, Francine. 1995. “Technology Networking in Border Regions: A Case Study of the Euregion Maas‐Rhine.”. European Planning Studies, 3: 63–83.
18. Hurrell, Andrew. 1995. “Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective.”. In Regionalism in World Politics. Regional Organization and International Order, Edited by: Fawcett, L., and Hurrell, A., 37–73. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Klein, Reinhard. 1995. “Grenzüberschreitende regionalpolitische Zusammenarbeit im Rahmen von INTERREG und PHARE.”. EUREG: European Journal of Regional Development, 2: 48–52.
20. Krätke, Stephen. 1996. “Where East Meets West: The German‐Polish Border Region in Transformation.”. European Planning Studies, 4(5): 647–69.
21. Majone, Giandomenico. 1996. Regulating Europe, London: Routledge.
22. Marks, Gary. 1997. “An Actor‐Centred Approach to Multi‐Level Governance.”. In The Regional Dimension of the European Union: Towards a Third Level in Europe?, Edited by: Jeffrey, C., 20–40. London: Frank Cass.
23. Mønnesland, Jan. “Cross Border Programmes versus Regional Development Programmes. The Population Density Influence.”. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference. September21–24, Bilbao, Spain.
24. Mønnesland, Jan, Westlund, H., Moen, B., and Anderson, T.N., 1998. Grensregionalt samarbeid. Underveisevaluering av tre svensk‐norske Ey‐program under Interreg IIA, Project Report 1998/26 Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research (NIBR).
25. Novotny, Gabor. “The Institution of Euroregions: Prerequisite for Success? (The Role of Euroregions in Developing Cross‐Border Co‐operation for an Eastern‐European Perspective).”. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference. September21–24, Bilbao, Spain.
26. Oude Veldhuis, C.H.G., 1995. Euregio's: Grenseloos of Begrensd? Een onderzoek naar de effectiviteit van de Euregio's langs de Nederlands‐Duitse Grens, Enschede, Holland: School of Law, University of Twente. Unpublished dissertation.
27. Roch, Isolde, Scott, James, and Ziegler, Astrid. 1997. “Transborder Regional Development through Cooperation: Perspectives for Strategic and Project‐Oriented Approaches.”. EUREG: European Journal of Regional Development, 6: 50–54.
28. Roch, Isolde, Ziegler, Astrid, and Scott, James. 1998. “Umweltgerechte Entwicklung von Grenzregionen durch kooperatives Handeln.”. In Schriften des IÖR, 24Dresden: Institut für Ökologische Raumentwicklung (IÖR).
29. Scott, James. 1993. “The Institutionalization of Transboundary Cooperation in Europe: Recent Developments on the Dutch‐German Border.”. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 12(1&2): 39–66.
30. Scott, James. 1998a. “VASAB 2010: Developing Geo‐Governance Structures for a New Baltic Regionalism.”. In Competition and Cooperation of the Baltic Regions of Denmark, Germany and Poland, Edited by: Toczyski, Witold. 75–90. Sopot: Regional Centre for Strategic Studies.
31. Scott, James. 1998b. “Planning Co‐operation and Transboundary Regionalism—Implementing European Border Region Policies in the German‐Polish Context.”. Environment and Planning: Government and Policy, 16(5): 605–24.
32. Scott, James. 1999. “Evolving Regimes for Local Transboundary Co‐operation. The German‐Polish Experience.”. In Curtains of Iron and Gold. Reconstructing Borders and Scales of Interaction, Edited by: Eskelinen, Heikki, Liikanen, Ilkka, and Oksa, Jukka. 179–93. Aldershot: Ashgate.
33. Scott, James, and Collins, Kimberly. 1997. “Inducing Cross‐Border Regionalism in Asymmetric Situations: The Case of the German‐Polish Border.”. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 12(1&2): 97–121.
34. Scherer, Roland, and Müller, Herbert. 1994. “Erfolgsbedingungen grenzüberschreitender Zusammenarbeit im Umweltschutz. Das Beispiel Bodenseeregion.”. In EURES, 34Freiburg: The EURES Institut.
35. Tavistock Institute. 1999. “The Thematic Evaluation of the Partnership Principle.”. In Report for the European Commission, London: Evaluation Development and Review Unit, Tavistock Institute.
36. Thielemann, Eiko. 1998. “Policy Networks and European Governance: The Europeanisation of Regional Policy‐Making in Germany.”. In Regional and Industrial Research Paper Series 27, Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.
37. Thielemann, Eiko. “European‐Induced Devolution in a Federal State? Overcoming National and Regional Gatekeepers in Germany.”. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Conference. September21–24, Bilbao, Spain.
38. Van Geenhuizen, Marina, Knapp, Bart van der, and Nijkamp, Peter. 1996. “Trans‐Border European Networks: Shifts in Corporate Strategy?”. European Planning Studies, 4(6): 671–82.
39. Van Houtum, Henk. 1998. “The Development of Cross‐Border Economic Relations.”, Center for Economic Research Dissertation Series, No. 40 Amsterdam: Thela. Thesis
40. Van Ruiten, Paul. 1996. “Vergleich grenzüberschreitender Zusammenarbeit an der deutsch‐niederländischen Grenze anhand einer netzwerktheoretischer Analyse.”. Institut für Regionalentwicklung und Strukturplanung, Erkner by Berlin. Unpublished project report.
41. Williams, Richard H., 1996. European Union, Spatial Policy and Planning, London: Paul Chapman.