The Readability of Australia's Taxation Laws and Supplementary Materials: An Empirical Investigation

Fiscal Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 321-349

  Smith, David ^a   Richardson, Grant ^b  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010263959     PISSN: 01435671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.1999.tb00016.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Commonwealth of Australia (1985), Reform of the Australian Tax System: Draft White Paper, White Paper, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
2. _ (1998), 'The review of business taxation: a strong foundation', Discussion Paper, Establishing Objectives, Principles and Processes, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
3. Cooper, G. S. (1993), 'Themes and issues in taxation simplification', Australian Tax Forum, vol. 10, pp. 417-60.
4. Courtis, J. K. (1998), 'Annual report readability variability: tests of the obfuscation hypothesis', Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, vol. 11, pp. 459-71.
5. Dale, E. and Chall, J. S. (1948), 'A formula for predicting readability', Education Research Bulletin, vol. 27, pp. 11-20 and pp. 37-54.
6. Eagleson, R. (1985), 'Plain English in the Statutes', Law Institute Journal, vol. 59, pp. 673-5.
7. England, G. W., Thomas, M. and Paterson, D. G. (1953), 'Reliability of the original and the simplified Flesch reading ease formulas', Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 37, pp. 111-13.
8. Evans, D. (1995), 'The emperor's new clothes', Taxation in Australia, vol. 30, pp. 192-4.
9. Flesch, R. F. (1948), 'A new readability yardstick', Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 32, pp. 221-33.
10. Gilliland, J. (1972), Readability, London: University of London Press.
11. Harrison, C. T. (1980), Readability in the Classroom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Hayes, P. M., Jenkins, J. J. and Walker, B. J. (1950), 'Reliability of the Flesch readability formulas', Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 34, pp. 22-6.
13. James, S., Sawyer, A. and Wallschutzky, I. (1997), 'Tax simplifications: a tale of three countries', Bulletin of the International Fiscal Association, vol. 51, pp. 493-503.
14. _, _ and _ (1998), 'The complexities of taxation simplification: progress in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom', in C. Evans and A. Greenbaum (eds), Taxation Administration: Facing the Challenges of the Future, Sydney: Prospect Media.
15. _ and Wallschutzky, I. (1997), 'Tax law improvement in Australia and the UK: the need for a strategy for simplification', Fiscal Studies, vol. 18, pp. 445-60.
16. Joint Committee of Public Accounts (1993), An Assessment of Tax: A Report on an Inquiry into the Australian Taxation Office, Report no. 326, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
17. _ (1997), An Advisory Report on the Tax Law Improvement Bill 1996, Report no. 348, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
18. Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R., Rogers, R. L. and Chissom, B. S. (1975), Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel, Millington TN: Branch Report 8-75, Chief of Naval Training.
19. Klare, G. (1988), 'The formative years', in B. L. Zakaluk and S. J. Samuels (eds), Readability: Its Past, Present and Future, Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
20. _ (1994), 'Readability', in P. D. Pearson (ed.), Handbook of Reading Research. New York: Longman.
21. Koch, B. S. and Karlinsky, S. S. (1984), 'The effect of federal income tax law reading complexity on students' task performance', Issues in Accounting Education, vol. 2, pp. 98-110.
22. Langenakker, P. (1995), 'The Tax Law Improvement Project', Proceedings of the Australasian Taxation Teachers' Conference, Fremantle, 20 January 1995, pp. 1-9.
23. Lehmann, G. (1995), 'The reform that does not reform and the simplification that does not simplify the taxation law improvement fiasco', Butterworths Weekly Tax Bulletin, no. 33, pp. 530-3.
24. Nolan, B. (1994), 'Putting a new complexion on complexity', Taxation in Australia, vol. 28, p. 486.
25. _ and Reid, T. (1994), 'Rewriting the Tax Act', Federal Law Review, vol. 22, pp. 448-60.
26. Pope, J. (1993), 'Simplification: tax agents' attitudes', Taxation in Australia Red Edition, vol. 1, pp. 292-6.
27. Reckers, P. M. J. and Stagliano, A. J. (1980), 'State income taxation forms: a test of readability', Akron Business and Economic Review.
28. Richardson, G. and Devos, K. (1998), 'A critical review of the Tax Law Improvement Project', Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin, vol. 4, pp. 369-78.
29. Richardson, M. and Sawyer, A. (1998), 'Complexity in the expression of New Zealand's taxation laws: an empirical analysis', Australian Tax Forum, vol. 14, pp. 147-82.
30. Smith, A. (1776), The Wealth of Nations. E. Cannan (ed.), New York: Putnam, 1904.
31. Tan, L. M. and Tower, G. (1992), The readability of taxation laws: an empirical study in New Zealand', Australian Tax Forum, vol. 9, pp. 355-72.
32. Wallschutzky, I. (1995), Cloze Analysis of Taxation Legislation, Canberra: Australian Tax Office.
33. Wickerson, J. (1994), 'Measuring taxpayer compliance: issues and challenges facing taxation administrations', Australian Tax Forum, vol. 11, pp. 1-44.
34. Woellner, R., Coleman, C., Gaylard, S., McKerchar, M., Walpole, M. and Zetler, J. (1998), 'Once more into the breach . . . A study of comparative compliance costs under the 1936 and 1997 Acts: a progress report', in C. Evans and A. Greenbaum (eds), Taxation Administration: Facing the Challenges of the Future, Sydney: Prospect Media.
35. Zakaluk, B. L. and Samuels, S. J. (1988), 'Toward a new approach to predicting text comprehensibility', in B. L. Zakaluk and S. J. Samuels (eds), Readability: Its Past, Present, and Future, Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.