Possibilities for feminism in ESL education and research

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 566-573

  Mackie, Ardiss ^a  

^a Okanagan University College   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010247168     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3587681     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alderson, C., & Scott, M. (1992). Insiders, outsiders and participatory evaluation. In C. Alderson & A. Beretta (Eds.), Evaluating second language education (pp. 25-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Anderson, K., Armitage, S., Jack, D., & Wittner, J. (1990). Beginning where we are: Feminist methodology in oral history. In J. M. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences (pp. 94-112). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. Aoki, T. (1986). Interests, knowledge, and evaluation: Alternative approaches to curriculum evaluation. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 6(4), 27-44.
4. Christ, C. P. (1987). Toward a paradigm shift in the academy and in religious studies. In C. Farnham (Ed.), The impact of feminist research in the academy (pp. 53-76). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
5. Clarke, M. (1994). The dysfunctions of the theory/practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 9-26.
6. Cook, J. A., & Fonow, M. M. (1990). Knowledge and women's interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. In J. M. Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences (pp. 72-112). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
7. Cooke, J., & Mackie, A. (1993). ESL for business curriculum. Unpublished manuscript, Okanagan University-College, Kelowna, Canada.
8. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.
9. Kirkup, G. (1986). The feminist evaluator. In E. R. House (Ed.), New directions in educational evaluation (pp. 68-84). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
10. Lather, P. (1988). Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies. Women's Studies International Forum, 11, 569-581.
11. Lewis, M. (1993). Without a word: Teaching beyond women's silence. London: Routledge.
12. Mackie, A. (1994). Shifting ground: Finding a feminist research voice through an evaluation of an ESL curriculum. Unpublished master's thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
13. Morgan, D. (1981). Men, masculinity and the process of sociological enquiry. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 83-113). London: Routledge.
14. Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 589-618.
15. Schniedewind, N. (1983). Feminist values: Guidelines for a teaching methodology in women's studies. In C. Bunch & S. Pollack (Eds.), Learning our way: Essays in feminist education (pp. 248-260). Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
16. Taubman, P. (1982). Gender and curriculum: Discourse and the politics of sexuality. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 4(1), 12-87.
17. Weiler, K. (1988). Women teaching for change. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.