Use of the jackknife statistic to evaluate result replicability

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 125, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 218-228

  Ang, Rebecca P ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010203648     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221309809595546     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brillinger, D. R. (1966). The application of the jackknifc to the analysis of sample surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 8, 74-80.
2. Carver, R. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review. 48, 378-399.
3. Carver, R. (1993). The case against statistical significance testing, revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(4), 287-292.
4. Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45(12), 1304-1312.
5. Cooil, B., Winer, R. S., Lrados, D. L. (1987). Cross-validation for prediction. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 271-279.
6. Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1971). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Wiley.
7. Crask, M. R., & Perreault, W. D., Jr. (1977). Validation of discriminant analysis in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 60-68.
8. Daniel, L. G. (1989, January). Use of the jackknife statistic to establish the external validity of discriminant analysis results. Paper presented at the annuaJ meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association. Houston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 305 382).
9. Daniel, L. G., & Okeafor, K. R. (1987, November). Teaching experience and confidence in teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Mobile, AL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 292 763).
10. Diaconis, P., & Efron, B. (1983). Computer-intensive methods in statistics. Scientific American, 248(5), 116-130.
11. Edwards, A. L. (1985). Multiple regression and the analysis of variance and covariance (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.
12. Huck, S. W., & Cormier, W. H. (1996). Reading statistics and research (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
13. Knapp, T. R. (1978). Canonical correlation analysis: A general parametric significance testing system. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 410-416.
14. Lunneborg, C. E. (1987). Bootstrap applications for the behavioral sciences (Vol. I). Seattle: University of Washington.
15. Okeafor, K. R., Licata, J. W., & Ecker, G. (1987). Toward an operational definition of the logic of confidence. Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 47-54.
16. Park, C., & Dudycha, A. (1974). A cross validation approach to sample size determination for regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69. 214-218.
17. Quenouille, M. H. (1956). Notes on bias in estimation. Biometrika, 43, 353-360.
18. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in the psychological science. American Psychologist, 44. 1276-1284.
19. Shaver, J. (1993). What statistical significance testing is. and what it is not. Journal of Experimental Education. 61(A), 293-316.
20. Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd cd.). Mah-wah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Taylor, D. L. (1991, January). Evaluating the sample specificity of discriminant analysis results using the jackknife statistic. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 328 574).
22. Thompson, B. (1988). Program FACSTRAP: A program that computes bootstrap esiimates of factor structure. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 48, 681-686.
23. Thompson, B. (1989). Statistical significance, result importance, and result generalizabil-ity: Three noteworthy but somewhat different issues. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 2-6.
24. Thompson, B. (1992). DISCSTRA: A computer program that computes bootstrap resampling estimates of descriptive discriminant analysis function and structure coefficients and group centroids. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 905-911.
25. Thompson, B. (1993). The use of statistical significance tests in research: Bootstrap and other alternatives. Journal oj Experimental Education, 61(4), 361-377.
26. Thompson, B. (1994, February). Why multivariate methods are usually vital in research: Some basic concepts. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Southwestern Society for Research in Human Development. Austin. TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 367 687).
27. Thompson, B., & Borrello, G. M. (1985). The importance of structure coefficients in regression research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 203-209.
28. Tucker, M. L., & Daniel, L. G. (1992. January). Investigating result stability of canonical function equations with the jackknife technique. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association. Houston. TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 305 382).
29. Tukey, J. W. (1958). Bias and confidence in not-quite large samples. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 614.