Tenure and community in academe

Educational Researcher

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 17-23

  Tierney, William G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010144330     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X026008017     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. American Association of University Professors (AAUP) (1985). Academic freedom and tenure: Statement of principles, 1940. In Finklestein, MJ (Ed.), ASHE reader on faculty issues in colleges and universities (pp. 143-45). Lexington, MA: Ginn Press.
2. Bowen, HR, and JH Schuster (1986). American professors: A national resource imperiled. Fair Lawn, NJ: Oxford University Press.
3. Breneman, D (1997). Alternative to tenure for the next generation of academics. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. (New Pathways Working Paper No. 14).
4. Byrne, JP (1997). Academic freedom without tenure?. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. (New Pathways Working Paper No. 5).
5. Chait, R (1995). The future of academic tenure. AGB Priorities, 1(3), 1-3.
6. Chait, R, and C Trower (1997). Where tenure does not reign: Colleges with contract systems. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. (New Pathways Working Paper No. 3).
7. Elliot, O (1937). Stanford University: The first twenty-five years. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8. Finkin, MW (1996). The case for tenure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9. Gappa, J (1996). Off the tenure track: Six models for full-time, nontenurable appointments. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. (New Pathways Working Paper No. 10).
10. Katz, M (1987). Reconstructing American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Layzell, D (1996). Faculty workload and productivity: Recurrent issues with the new imperatives. Review of Higher Education, 19(3), 267-281.
12. McPherson, MS, and G Winston (1993). The economics of academic tenure: A relational perspective. In MS McPherson, M Shapiro and G Winston (Eds.), Paying the piper: Productivity, incentives, and financing in U.S. higher education (pp. 109-311). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
13. O'Toole, J (1978). Tenure: A conscientious objection. Change, 10(6), 24-31.
14. Ross, E (1936). Seventy years of it. New York: Appleton-Century Co.
15. Slaughter, S (1994). Academic freedom at the end of the century: Professional labor, gender, and professionalization. In PG Altbach, RO Berdahl and PJ Gumport (Eds.), Higher education in American society (pp. 73-100). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
16. Sweezy, v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234, 77 S. Ct. 1203 (1957).
17. Tierney, WG (1993a). Academic freedom and the parameters of knowledge. Harvard Educational Review, 63(2), 143-160.
18. Tierney, WG (1993b). Building communities of difference. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
19. Tierney, WG (1997a). Academic community and post-tenure review. Academe, 83(1), 23-25.
20. Tierney, WG (1998). The responsive university: Restructuring for high performance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Tierney, WG, and E Bensimon (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. New York: State University of New York Press.