Teacher efficacy: A model for teacher development and inclusion

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 293-310

  Moeller, Aleidine J ^a   Ishii Jordan, Sharon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Inclusion; Paradigm shift; Teaching efficacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010141901     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02110132     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abramson, M. (1980). Implications of mainstreaming: A challenge for special education. In L. Mann (Ed.), The fourth review of special education. New York: Grune/Stratton.
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 3.4 191-215.
3. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
4. Bloom, R. (1981, April). The effects of disturbed adolescents on their teachers. Iowa Perspective.
5. Braaten, S., Kauffman, J., Braaten, B., Polsgrove, L., & Nelson, C. (1988). The regular education initiative: Patent medicine for behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 55, 21-28.
6. Campbell, N. J., Dobson, J. E., & Bost, J. M. (1985). Educator perceptions of behavior problems of mainstreamed students. Exceptional Children, 51, 298-303.
7. Carri, L. (1985). Inservice teachers' assessed needs in behavioral disorders, mental retardation, and learning disabilities: Are they similar? Exceptional Children, 51, 411-416.
8. Chalmers, L. (1992). Modifying curriculum for the special needs student in the regular classroom. Minnesota: Practical Press.
9. Coatis, R. D. (1989). The regular education initiative and opinions of regular classroom teachers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 532-536.
10. Edge, J. (1988). Training, education, development: Worlds apart? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Association for Teaching and Research in Overseas Education, Moray House College, Edinburgh.
11. Education of the Handicapped Act (1975). Public Law 94-142.
12. Executive Committee of the Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders, The. (1989). Position Statement on the regular education initiative. Behavioral Disorders, 14(3), 201-207.
13. Foster, G., Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, T. (1980). Classroom teacher and teacher in training susceptibility to stereotype bias. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 59, 27-30.
14. Freeman, S., & Algozzine, B. (1980). Social acceptability as a function of labels and as signed attributes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 589-595.
15. Gersten, R., Walker, H., & Darch, C. (1988). Relationship between teachers' effectiveness and their tolerance for handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 54, 433-438.
16. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582.
17. Goodlad, J. (1994). Educational renewal. Better teachers, better schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Gresham, F. M. (1982). Misguided mainstreaming: The case for social skills training with handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 48, 422-433.
19. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. (1988). Teachers' social validity ratings and social skills; comparisons between mildly handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 6, 225-234.
20. Hallahan, D. P., Keller, C. E., McKinney, J. D., Lloyd, J. W., & Bryan, T. (1988). Examining the research base of the regular education initiative: Efficacy studies and the ALEM. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 29-35.
21. Hardman, M. L., Drew, C. J., Egan, M. W., & Wolf, B. (1993). Human Exceptionality: Society, School, and Family (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Herr, D., Algozzine, B., & Eaves, P. (1976). Modifications of biases held by teacher trainees toward the disturbingness of behavior. Journal of Educational Research, 169, 261-264.
23. Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers' sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 355-372.
24. Johnson, A. (1987). Attitudes toward mainstreaming: Implications for inservice training and teaching the handicapped. Education, 107, 229-233.
25. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1984). Cooperation in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kauffman, J. M. (1993). How we might achieve the radical reform of special education. Exceptional Children, 60(1), 61-16.
27. Kauffman, J. M., Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I. (1988). Arguable assumptions underlying the regular education initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 6-12.
28. Kaufman, M. J., Gottlieb, J., Agard, J. A., & Kukic, M. D. (1975). Mainstreaming: Toward an explication of the construct. In E. L. Meyen, G. A. Vergason, & R. J. Whelan (Eds.), Alternatives for teaching exceptional children (pp. 35-54). Denver: Love.
29. Kearney, C. A., & Durand, V. M. (1992). How prepared are our teachers for mainstreamed classroom settings? A survey of postsecondary schools of education in New York state. Exceptional Children, 59, 6-11.
30. Lacour, E. D., & Wilkerson, T. W. (1991). Efficacy in education: A synopsis of the literature. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 341 663).
31. Landrum, T. J. (1992). Teachers as victims: An interactional analysis of the teacher's role in educating atypical learners. Behavioral Disorders, 17(2), 135-143.
32. Leyser, Y., & Abrams, P. D. (1986). Perceived training needs of regular and special education students teachers in the area of mainstreaming. The Exceptional Child, 32, 175-183.
33. Moeller, A. J. (1994). Portfolio assessment. A showcase for growth and learning in the foreign language classroom. In G. Crouse (Ed.), Meeting new challenges in the foreign language classroom. Central States Conference Report. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
34. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (1991). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching professions: Initial policies and perspectives of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (3rd ed.). Detroit, MI: Author.
35. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
36. Nisbet, J. (Ed.). (1992). Natural supports in school, at work, and in the community for people with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Brookes.
37. Nunan, D. (1988). The learner centered curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every student should know. New York: Newbury House.
39. Posner, G. J. (1995). Analyzing the curriculum (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Putnam, J. W. (Ed.). (1993). Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion: Celebrating diversity in the classroom. Baltimore: Brookes.
41. Putnam, J. W., Spiegel, A. N., & Bruininks, R. H. (1995). Future directions in education and inclusion of students with disabilities: A Delphi investigation. Exceptional Children, 61, 553-576.
42. Resnick, L. B. (1983). Mathematics and science learning. A new conception. Science, 29, 477.
43. Rogers, J. (1994, February). The inclusion revolution. Streamlined Seminar (pp. 1-4).
44. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
45. Schrier, L. L., & Hammadou, J. (1994). Assessment in foreign language teacher education. In C. Hancock (Ed.), Teaching, testing, and assessment making the connection (pp. 211-234). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.
46. Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1988). Implementing the regular education initiative in secondary schools: A different ball game. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(1), 36-42.
47. Schwab, J. J. (1970). The practical: A language for curriculum. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
48. Smith, C. (1995). Has the "inclusion revolution" proven to be an effective model to use in the teaching of all special needs learners within our nation's school system. Unpublished manuscript.
49. Smith, M., & Anjal, M. (1992). A comprehensive management system in regular classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 15(3), 353-369.
50. Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102-111.
51. Stephens, S. (1990). Latin and the learning disabled student. The Classical Outlook, Summer, 1990, p. 111-113.
52. Ulich, R. (1955). The human career: A philosophy of self-transcendence. New York: Harper & Brothers.
53. Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers. A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Wang, M. C., Reynolds, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1986). Rethinking special education. Educational Leadership, 44, 26-31.
55. Watzlawick, P. (Ed.). (1984). The inverted reality. New York: W. W. Norton.
56. Will, M. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411-416.
57. Wittrock, M. C. (1985). Cognitive process in the learning and teaching of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
58. Woodruff, M. D. (1986). What is the question? Paper presented at the International conference on Second/Foreign Language Acquisition by Children. Dallas, TX. November 1986. ED 281 381.