The Affordances of Perceptual Inquiry: Pictures are Learned from the World, and What that Fact Might Mean about Perception Quite Generally

Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory

Volumn 36, Issue C, 1997, Pages 15-44

  Hochberg, Julian ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010097789     PISSN: 00797421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60280-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (95)

1. Attneave F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review. 61 (1954) 183-193
2. Baxandall M. Shadows and enlightenment. (1995), Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
3. Biederman I. Human image understanding: Recent reserch and a theory. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing. 32 (1985) 29-73
4. T. Binford (1971). Visual perception by computer. Proceedings, IIEE conference on systems science and cybernetics. Miami, Fl
5. Boselie F., and Leeuwenberg E. A test of the minimum principle requires a perceptual coding system. Perception. 15 (1986) 331-354
6. Brunswik E. Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). (1956), University of California Press, Berkeley
7. Brunswik E., and Kamiya J. Ecological cue-validity of "proximity" and other Gestalt factors. American Journal of Psychology. 66 (1953) 20-32
8. Chase W.G., and Simon H.A. Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology. 4 (1973) 55-81
9. Cutting J.E. Perception with an eye for motion. (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
10. Cutting J.E. Rigidity in cinema seen from the front row, side aisle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 13 (1987) 323-329
11. Cutting J.E., and Vishton P.M. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The interaction of relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W., and Rogers S.J. (Eds). Handbook of perception and cognition. Vol.5. Perception of space and motion. (1995), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 69-117
12. DeLoache J.S., and Burns N.M. Cognition. 52 (1994) 83-110
13. Deregowski J.B. Difficulties in pictorial depth perception in Africa. British Journal of Psychology. 59 (1968) 195-204
14. Field D.J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 4 (1987) 2379-2394
15. Gibson J.J. The visual world. (1950), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
16. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception. (1979), Houghton-Mifflin, Boston
17. Gillam B. Even a possible figure can look impossible. Perception. 8 (1979) 229-232
18. Ginsburg A. Specifying relevant spatial information for image evaluation and display design: An explanation of how we see objects. Perception & Psychophysics. 21 (1980) 219-228
19. Haber R.N., Haber L.R., Levin C.A., and Hollyfield R. Properties of spatial representations: Data from sighted and blind subjects. Perception & Psychophysics. 54 (1993) 1-13
20. Hagen M.A. Picture perception: Toward a theoretical model. Psychological Bulletin. 81 (1974) 471-497
21. Hagen M.A., and Jones R.K. Differential patterns of preference for modified linear perspective in children and in adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 26 (1978) 205-215
22. Hatfield G.C., and Epstein W. The status of the minimum principle in the theoretical analysis of visual perception. Psychological Bulletin. 97 (1985) 155-186
23. Hebb D. The organization of behavior. (1949), Wiley, New York
24. Hess R.F., and Field D. Is the increased spatial uncertainty in the normal periphery due to spatial undersampling or uncalibrated disarray. Vision Research. 33 (1993) 2663-2670
25. Hochberg J. The psychophysics of pictorial perception. Audio-Visual Communications Review. 10 (1962) 22-54
26. Hochberg J. Perception. (1964), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
27. Hochberg J. In the mind's eye. In: Haber R.N. (Ed). Contemporary theory and research in visual perception. (1968), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
28. Hochberg J. Attention, organization and consciousness. In: Mostofsky D.I. (Ed). Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis. (1970), Appelton-Century-Crofts, New York
29. Hochberg J. Perception I. Color and shape. II. Space and movement. In: King J.W., and Riggs L.A. (Eds). Woodworth & Schlosberg's experimental psychology. (1972), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
30. Hochberg J. Organization and the Gestalt tradition. In: Carterette E.C., and Friedman M. (Eds). Handbook of perception. Vol. I. (1974), Academic Press, New York
31. Hochberg J. Pictorial function and perceptual structures. In: Hagen M.A. (Ed). The perception of pictures. 2 (1980), Academic Press, New York 47-93
32. Hochberg J. The perception of pictorial representations. Social Research. 51 (1984) 841-862
33. Hochberg J. Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays. In: Boff K., Thomas J., and Kaufman L. (Eds). Handbook of perception and human performance. 1 (1986), Wiley, New York 1-64
34. Hochberg J. Construction of pictorial meaning. In: Sebeok T.A., and Umiker-Sebeok J. (Eds). Advances in visual semiotics: The semiotic web 1992-93. (1994), Mouton de Gruyter, Berln 110-162
35. Hochberg J. Construction of pictorial meaning. In: Sebeok T.A., and Umiker-Sebeok J. (Eds). Advances in visual semiotics: The semiotic web 1992-93. (1995), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 110-162
36. Hochberg J. The perception of pictures and pictorial art. In: Friedman M., and Carterette E. (Eds). Handbook of perception & cognition: Cognitive ecology. (1996), Academic Press, New York 151-203
37. Hochberg J., and Brooks V. Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: A study of one child's performance. American Journal of Psychology. 75 (1962) 624-628
38. Hochberg J., and Brooks V. The perception of motion pictures. In: Friedman M., and Carterette E. (Eds). Cognitive ecology. (1996), Wiley, New York 205-292
39. Hochberg J., and Gelman L. The effect of landmark features on mental rotation times. Memory and Cognition. 5 (1977) 23-26
40. Hochberg J., and McAlister E. A quantitative approach to figural goodness. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 46 (1953) 361-364
41. Hochberg J., and Peterson M.A. Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception: Perceptually coupled responses to moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 116 (1987) 370-380
42. Hoffman J.E., and Subramaniam B. Saccadic eye movements and visual selective attention. Perception and Psychophysics. 57 (1995) 787-795
43. Hudson W. Pictorial depth perception in sub-cultural groups in Africa. Journal of Social Psychology. 52 (1962) 183-208
44. Hudson W. The study of the problem of pictorial perception among unculturated groups. International Journal of Psychology. 2 (1967) 89-107
45. Hughes H.C., Nozowa G., and Kitterle F. Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistics of natural images. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 8 (1996) 197-230
46. Hummel J., and Biederman I. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review. 99 (1992) 480-517
47. Humphreys G.W., and Riddoch M.J. To see but not to see: A case study of visual agnosia. (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
48. Irwin D.E., Zacks J.L., and Brown J.H. Visual memory and the perception of a stable visual environment. Perception & Psychophysics. 47 (1990) 35-46
49. Ittelson W.H. Visual perception of markings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 3 (1996) 171-187
50. Jahoda G., and McGurk H. Pictorial depth perception in Scottish and Ghanaian children: A critique of some findings with the Hudson test. International Journal of Psychology. 9 (1974) 255-267
51. Jones R.K., and Hagen M.A. A perspective on cross-cultural picture perception. In: Hagen M.A. (Ed). The perception of pictures, II. (1980), Academic Press, New York 193-226
52. Kanade T. Recovery of the three-dimensional shape of an object from a single view. Artificial Intelligence. 17 (1981) 409-460
53. Kellman P.J. Kinematic foundations of infant visual perception. In: Granrud C. (Ed). Visual perception and cognition in infants. (1993), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 121-173
54. Kennedy J.M. A psychology of picture perception. (1974), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
55. Kennedy J.M. Ancient and modern picture-perception abilities in Africa. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 35 (1977) 293-300
56. Kilbride P.L., and Robbins M.C. Linear perspective, pictorial depth perception and education among the Baganda. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 27 (1968) 601-602
57. Klopfer D.S. Parsing of complex, unfamiliar objects, and their pictorial representations. (1983), Columbia University Ph.D. Dissertation
58. Koffka K. Principles of Gestalt psychology. (1935), Harcourt Brace, New York
59. Kopfermann H. Psychologische Untersuchungen über die Wirkung Zweidimensionaler Darstellunger köperlicher Gebilde. Psychologische Forschung. 13 (1930) 293-364
60. Krampen M. Children's drawings: Iconic coding of the environment. (1993), Plenum, New York
61. Kubovy M. The psychology of linear perspective in Renaissance art. (1986), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
62. Leeuwenberg E. A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory paterns. American Journal of Psychology. 84 (1971) 307-349
63. Leibowitz H., Johnson C., and Isabelle E. Peripheral motion detection and refractive error. Science. 177 (1972) 1207-1208
64. Lowe D. Three-dimensional object recognition from single two-dimensional images. Artificial Intelligence. 31 (1987) 355-395
65. Metzger W. Gesetze des Sehens. (1953), Kramer, Frankfurt-am-Main
66. Michaels C.F., and Carello C. Direct perception. (1981), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
67. Miller G.A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review. 63 (1956) 81-97
68. Mundy-Castle A.C. Pictorial depth perception in Ghanian children. International Journal of Psychology. 1 (1966) 288-300
69. Palmer S.E. Symmetry, transformation, and the structure of perceptual systems. In: Beck J. (Ed). Organization and representation in perception. (1982), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
70. Peterson M.A. Object recognition processes can and do operate before figure-ground organization. Current Directions in Psychology. 3 (1994) 105-111
71. M.A. Peterson (Submitted) The relationship between depth segregation and object recognition: Old assumptions, new findings, and a new aproach to object recognition
72. Peterson M.A., and Gibson B.S. Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground organization in three-dimensional display. Cognitive Psychology. 25 (1993) 383-429
73. Peterson M.A., and Gibson B.S. Must shape recognition follow figure-ground organization? An assumption in peril. Psychological Science. 5 (1994) 253-259
74. Peterson M.A., Harvey E.M.H., and Weidenbacher H.L. Shape recognition inputs to figure-ground organization: Which route counts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17 (1991) 1075-1089
75. Peterson M.A., and Hochberg J. The opposed-set measurement procedure: The role of local cues and intention in form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 9 (1983) 183-193
76. Peterson M.A., and Hochberg J. Necessary considerations for a theory of form perception: A theoretical and empirical reply to Boselie and Leeuwenberg. Perception. 18 (1989) 105-119
77. Pirenne M. Optics, painting and photography. (1970), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
78. Pomerantz J.R., and Kubovy M. Simplicity and liklihood principles. In: Boff K., Kaufman L., and Thomas J. (Eds). Handbook of perception and human performance. 2 (1986), Wiley, New York 1-46 Ch.36
79. Previc F.H. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 13 (1990) 519-575
80. Rubin N., Nakayama K., and Shapley R. Enhanced perception of illusory contours in the lower versus upper visual hemifields. Science. 271 (1996) 651-653
81. Ryan T.A., and Schwartz C. Speed of perception as a function of mode of representation. American Journal of Psychology. 69 (1956) 60-69
82. Schneider G.E. Two visual systems. Science. 163 (1969) 895-902
83. P.G. Schyns (Submitted). Diagnostic recognition: Task constraints, object information, and their interactions
84. Schyns P.G., and Rodet L. Categorization creates functional features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition. 23 (1997) 1-16
85. Spelke E.S. Preferential looking methods as tools for the study of cognition in infancy. In: Yonas A. (Ed). Perceptual development in infancy: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology. 20 (1985), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
86. Sperling G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs. 74 11 (1960) Whole No. 498
87. Terrace H.S., Jaswal V., Brannon E., and Shaofu C. What is a chunk? Ask a monkey. Abstracts of the Psychonomics Society. 1 (1996) 35
88. Tolman E.C. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review. 55 (1948) 189-208
89. Trevarthen C. Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung. 31 (1968) 299-337
90. Warren W.H. Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 10 (1984) 683-703
91. Warren W.H., and Wang S. Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 13 (1987) 371-383
92. Wicklegren W. Context sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. Psychological Review. 76 (1969) 1-15
93. Witkin A.P., and Tenenbaum J.M. On the role of structure in vision. In: Beck J., Hope B., and Rosenfeld A. (Eds). Human and machine vision. (1983), Academic Press, New York
94. Woodworth R.S. Experimental psychology. (1938), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
95. Yonas A., and Hagen M.A. Effects of static and kinetic depth information on the perception of size in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 15 (1973) 254-265