Reinventing the treasury: Economic rationalism or an econocrat's fallacy of control?

Public Administration

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 395-415

  Parry, Richard ^a   Hood, Christopher ^b   James, Oliver ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b Dept of Pub Admin and Pub Policy ^*

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010090450     PISSN: 00333298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00067     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ayers, I. and J. Braithwaite. 1992. Responsive regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bahmueller, C.F. 1981. The national charity company. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Blau, P.M. 1955. The dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Brams, S.J. 1975. Game theory and politics. New York: Free Press.
5. Bridges, E. 1963. The Treasury as the most political of departments', pp. 1-20 in C.J. Friedrich and S.E. Harris (eds.), Public policy: a yearbook of the Graduate School of Public Administration, Harvard University. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard Graduate School of Public Administration.
6. _. 1966. The Treasury (New Whitehall Series No. 12), London: Allen and Unwin/RIPA.
7. Burns, T. 1994a. 'Change and the treasury', Durham University Lecture, 27 April.
8. _. 1994b. 'Some reflections on the Treasury' in S. Holly (ed.), Money, inflation and employment: essays in honour of James Ball. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
9. _. 1995. Eleanor Rathbone Memorial Lecture, 28 March. London: HM Treasury.
10. Cabinet Office. 1991. Making the most of Next Steps. London: HMSO.
11. _. 1994. Next Steps: moving on. London: Office of Public Service and Science.
12. _. 1994. The civil service: continuity and change. Cm 2627. London: HMSO.
13. Dickens, C. 1910. David Copperfield. London: The Educational Book Co.
14. Dunleavy, P. 1991. Democracy, bureaucracy and public choice. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
15. Dunsire, A. 1978. The execution process: vol. 2. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
16. _. 1990. 'Holistic governance'. Public Policy and Administration 5, 1, 4-19.
17. Fischer, D.H. 1971. Historians' fallacies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
18. HM Treasury. 1994. Financial statement and budget report 1994-95, HC 31 1993-4. London: HMSO.
19. _. 1994. Fundamental review of running costs: HM Treasury. London: HM Treasury.
20. Hammer, M. and J. Champy. 1993. Re-engineering the corporation, London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
21. Heclo, H. and A. Wildavsky. 1974. The private government of public money. London: Macmillan.
22. Hennessy, P. 1989. Whitehall. London: Fontana.
23. Hood, C.C. 1996. 'Control over bureaucracy: cultural theory and institutional variety', Journal of Public Policy 15, 3, 207-30.
24. Mountfield, R. 1996. The new senior civil service: managing the paradox'. Speech to ESRC Whitehall Programme Conference, University of Birmingham, 16 Sept.
25. Pollitt, C. 1984. Manipulating the machine. London: Allen and Unwin.
26. Scholz, J.T. 1991. 'Cooperative regulatory enforcement and the politics of administrative effectiveness', American Political Science Review 85, 1, 115-36.
27. Self, P.J.O. 1993. Government by the market? London: Macmillan.
28. _. 1995. Econocrats and the policy process. London: Macmillan.
29. Shapiro, D. 1978. The policy implications of Treasury organization', paper presented to the FAC Conference, University of York, Sept.
30. Sieber, S. 1981. Fatal remedies. New York: Plenum.
31. Thain, C. and M. Wright. 1995. The Treasury and Whitehall. Oxford: Clarendon.
32. Treasury and Civil Service Sub-Committee. 1995. HM Treasury's Fundamental Expenditure Review: Minutes of Evidence Tuesday 16 May 1995 (Sir Terry Burns and Mr. Paul Gray). HC 4351 1994-5. London: HMSO.