Antidumping policy in the European community: Political discretion or technical determination

Economics and Politics

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 111-131

  Eymann, Angelika ^a   Schuknecht, Ludger ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010057416     PISSN: 09541985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.1996.tb00124.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baldwin, R. E., 1985, The Political Economy of US Import Policy (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.).
2. _ and Moore, M. O., 1991, Political aspects of the administration of the trade remedy laws, in: R. Boltuck and R. E. Litan, eds., Down in the Dumps (The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.).
3. Bhagwati, J. N., 1988, Protectionism (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.).
4. _, 1991, The World Trading System at Risk (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York).
5. Bierwagen, R. M., 1995, Die neue Antidumpinggrundverordnung nach Abschluß der Uruguay-Runde. Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 8, 231-239.
6. Boltuck, R. and R. E. Litan, eds., 1991, Down in the Dumps (The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.).
7. Destler, I. M., 1992, American Trade Politics, 2nd edition (Institute for International Economics, Washington D.C.).
8. Deutsche Bundesbank, 1990, Statistische Beihefte zu den Monatsberichten der Deutschen Bundesbank: Die Währungen der Welt, Ser. 5.2.
9. European Communities, Official Journal of the European Communities, Ser. L., various issues, 1980-1990 (Brussels).
10. EUROSTAT, 1989, Basic Statistics, 26th edition (Brussels).
11. Finger, J. M., 1989, Protectionist rules and internationalist discretion in the making of national trade policy, in: H. J. Vosgerau, ed., New Institutional Arrangements for the World Economy (Springer, Berlin), 310-323.
12. Finger, J. M. (ed.), 1993, Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press).
13. _, H. K. Hall, and D. R. Nelson, 1982, The political economy of administered protection. American Economic Review 72, 452-466.
14. _ and T. Murray, 1990, Policing unfair imports: the U.S. example. Journal of World Trade 24, 39-54.
15. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 1991, European Communities. Report by the Secretariat. Trade Policy Mechanism (Geneva).
16. Herander, M. G. and J. B. Schwartz, 1984, An empirical test of the threat of U.S. trade policy: the case of antidumping duties. Southern Economic Journal 51, 59-79.
17. Hillman, A. L., 1989, The Political Economy of Protection (Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur).
18. _, 1990, Protection as the regulation of international industry. Public Choice 67, 101-110.
19. Kaplan, S., 1991, Injury and causation in USITC antidumping determination: five recent approaches, in: P. K. M. Tharakan, ed., Policy Implications of Antidumping Measures (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 143-173.
20. Leidy, M. P. and B. M. Hoekman, 1991, Spurious injury as indirect rent seeking: free trade under the prospect of protection. Economics and Politics 3, 111-137.
21. Messerlin, P. A., 1989, The EC antidumping regulations: a first economic appraisal, 1980-1985. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 125, 563-587.
22. _, 1990, Antidumping regulations or procartel law? The EC chemical cases. The World Economy 13, 465-492.
23. _, 1991, The Uruguay negotiations on antidumping enforcement: some basic issues, in: P. K. M. Tharakan, ed., Policy Implications on Antidumping Measures (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 45-76.
24. Moore, M. O., 1992, Rules or politics?: An empirical analysis of ITC anti-dumping decisions. Economic Inquiry 30, 449-466.
25. OECD, OECD Statistics of Foreign Trade. Monthly Bulletins. Various issues, 1980-1989.
26. Schuknecht, L., 1992, Trade Protection in the European Community (Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur).
27. Staiger, R. W. and F. A. Wolak, 1989, Strategic use of antidumping law to enforce tacit international collusion. NBER Discussion Paper 3016 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass).
28. Stegemann, K., 1990., EC anti-dumping policy: are price undertakings a legal substitute for illegal price fixing? Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 126, 268-298.
29. _, 1991, Settlement of antidumping cases by price undertakings: is the EC more liberal than Canada?, in: P. K. M. Tharakan, ed., Policy Implications of Antidumping Measures (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 219-268.
30. Tharakan, P. K. M., 1991, The political economy of antidumping undertakings in the European Communities. European Economic Review 35, 1341-1359.
31. United Nations. Industrial Statistics Yearbook, Vol. 2. Various issues (New York).
32. Van Bael, I., 1990, EEC anti-dumping law and procedure revisited. Journal of World Trade Law 24, 5-23.
33. Vaubel, R., 1991, The antidumping policy of the European Community: a critique and two proposals, in: T. Oppermann and J. Molsberger, eds., A New GATT for the Nineties and Europe '92 (Nomos, Baden-Baden).
34. Vermulst, E. A., 1987, Antidumping law and practice in the United States and the European Communities: a comparative analysis (North-Holland, Amsterdam).