Social identity, political evaluation and collective mobilisation in a supranational context;Identidad social, valoración política y movilización colectiva en un contexto supranacional

Revista de Psicologia Social

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 269-279

  Sabucedo, José Manuel ^a   Klandermans, Bert ^b   Rodríguez, Mauro ^a   Fernández, Concepción ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Group identification; Identidad social; Identificaci n grupal; Political assessment; Political protest; Protesta pol tica; Social identity; Valoraci n pol tica

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010038709     PISSN: 02134748     EISSN: 15793680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/021347400760259703     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Andrews, M. (1991) Lifetimes of commitment, aging, politics, psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
3. De Weerd, M. y Klandermans, B. (1999). Group identification and political protest: farmer’s protest in The Netherlands. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1073-1095.
4. Ellemers, N. (1993) The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. En W. Stroebe y M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27-57). Chichester: Wiley.
5. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talkingpolitics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
6. Kelly, C. y Breinlinger, S. (1996). The social psychology of collective action. Londres: Taylor and Francis.
7. Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Klandermans, B., de Weerd, M., Sabucedo, J. M. y Costa, M. (1999). Injustice and adversarial frames in a supranational political context: farmer’s protest in The Netherlands and Spain. En H. Kriesi, D. della Porta y D. Rucht (Eds.), Social movements in aglobalizing world (pp. 134-147). Londres: Macmillan.
9. Kriesi, H. (1991). The political opportunity structure of new social movements: Its impact on their mobilization. Discussionpaper FS III 91-103, Wissenschaftszentrum, Berlin.
10. Muller, E. N. (1982). An explanatory model for different types of particifation. European Journal of Political Research, 10, 1-16
11. Reicher, S. D. (1996). The battle of Westminster: Developing the social identity model of crowd behavior in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 115-134
12. Sabucedo, J. M. (1990). Discurso social y acción política. III Congreso nacional de psicología social. Libro de simposios. Santiago de Compostela
13. Sabucedo, J. M., Klandermans, B., Rodríguez, M. y de Weerd, M. (1999). Pertenencia a organizaciones y legitimación de la acción colectiva. En J. Apalategui (Ed.), La anticipación de la sociedad. Psicología social de los movimientos sociales (pp. 141-164). Valencia: Promolibro.
14. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of inter groups relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
15. TAJFEL, H. (1986). Grupos humanos y categorías sociales. Barcelona: Herder.
16. Tajfel, H. y Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. En S. Worchel y W. G. A. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Monterrey: Brooks Cole.
17. Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization torevolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
18. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, A. y McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
19. Wolsfeld, G. (1986). Political action repertories. The role of efficacy. Comparativepolitical studies, 19 (1), 104-129.