Transforming conceptual models to object-oriented database designs: Practicalities, properties, and peculiarities

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1157 LNCS, Issue , 1996, Pages 309-324

  Mok, Wai Yin ^a   Embley, David W ^a  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN;

CONCEPTUAL MODEL; DESIGN PROCEDURE; DESIGNING COMPLEX; FORMAL PROPERTIES; OBJECT ORIENTED DATABASE DESIGNS;

OBJECT-ORIENTED DATABASES;

EID: 0009974038     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0019931     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. 2, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mate.o, California, 1992.
2. C. Batini, S. Ceri, and S.B. Navathe, Conceptual Database Design, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Redwood City, California, 1992.
3. J. Biskup, "Database schema design theory: Achievements and challenges, " Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, CISMOD'95. The proceedings appeared as Lecture Notes in Computer Science #1006, pp. 14-44, Bombay, India, November 1995.
4. E J. Codd, "Recent investigations in relational tin!abase systems, " Proceedings of the 1974 IFIP Conference, pp. 1017-1021, 1974.
5. D.W. Embley and T.W. Ling, "Synergistic database design with an extended entity-relationship model, " Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Entity-Relational Approach, pp. 118-135, Toronto, Canada, October 18-20, 1989.
6. D.W. Embley, B.D. Kurtz, and S.N. Woodfield, Object-oriented Systems Analysis: A Model-driven Approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1992.
7. R. Fagin, A.O. Mendelzon, and J.D. Ullman, "A simplified universal relation assumption and its properties" ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 343-360, September 1982.
8. R. Fagin, "Degrees of acyclicity for hypergraphs and relational database schemes, " Journal of the ACM, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 514-550, July 1983.
9. T.A. Halpin, Conceptual Schema & Relational Database Design, 2nd Edition, Prentice-Hall, Sydney, Australia, 1995.
10. W. Kent, "Consequences of assuming a universal relation, " ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 539-556, December 1981.
11. W. Kim, "Editorial Directions, " ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 237-238, September 1995.
12. D. Maier, The Theory of Relational Databases, Computer Science Press, Roelcville, Maryland, 1983.
13. V.M. Markowitz and A. Shoshani, "Representing extended entity-relationship structures in relational databases: A modular approach, " ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 423-464, September 1992.
14. W.Y. Mok, Y.K. Ng, and D.W. Embley, "A normal form for precisely characterizing redundancy in nested relations, " ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 77-106, March 1996. .
15. M.A. Roth, H.F. Korth, and A. Silberschatz, "Extended algebra and calculus for nested relational databases, " ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 389-417, December 1988.
16. T.I. Teorey, Database Modeling & Design: The Fundamental Principles, 2nd Edition, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, California, 1994.
17. J.D. Ullman, "The U.R. strikes back, " Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pp. 10-22, Los Angeles, California, March 1982.