Comparison of JPEG and fractal-based image compression on target acquisition by human observers

Optical Engineering

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 284-288

  Ewing, Gary J ^b   Woodruff, Christopher J ^a  

^a DEFENCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANISATION   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Image compression; Image quality; Target acquisition; Visual search

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009965498     PISSN: 00913286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1117/1.600932     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. G. K. Wallace, "The JPEG still picture compression standard," IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron. 38(1), 18-34 (1992).
2. A. Leger, T. Omachi, and G. K. Wallace, "JPEG still picture compression algorithm," Opt. Eng. 30(7), 947-954 (1991).
3. Y. Fisher, "Fractal image compression," Fractals 2(3), 347-61 (1994).
4. A. E. Jaquin, "Fractal image coding: a review," Proc. IEEE 81(10), 1451-1465 (1993).
5. G. Lu, ""Fractal image compression, signal processing," Image Comm. 5, 327-343 (1993).
6. W. W. Hines and D. C. Montgomery, "Analysis of variance," in Probability and Statistics in Engineering and Management Science, pp. 328-352, Wiley, New York (1980).
7. C. J. Woodruff and G. N. Newsam, "Displaying undersampled imagery," Opt. Eng. 32(2), 579-585 (1994).
8. G. N. Newsam, "Smooth zooming of images," in Proc. 1st New Zealand Conf. Image & Vision Computing, pp 221-228 (1993).
9. W. W. Hines and D. C. Montgomery, "Design of experiments," in Probability and Statistics in Engineering and Management Science, pp. 481-485, Wiley, New York (1980).