Psychological measurement;La medición de lo psicológico

Psicothema

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-21

  Muñiz, José ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009960881     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (153)

1. Allen, M. J. y Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
2. American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education y National Education Association (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Washington, DC: Autor.
3. Anastasi, A. (1986). Evolving concepts of test validation. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 1-15.
4. Baird, J. C. (1997). Sensation and judgment: complementary theory of psychophysics. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
5. Baird, J. C. y Noma, E. (1978). Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. Nueva York: Wiley.
6. Binet, A. y Simon, T. H. (1905). Methodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux. L'Année Psychologique, 11, 191-244.
7. Birnbaum, A. (1957). Efficient design and use of tests of ability for various decision-making problems (Series Report n° 58-16, Project n° 7755-23). Randolph Air Force Base, TX: USAF School of Aviation Medicine.
8. Blanco, M. (1996). Psicofísica. Madrid: Universitas.
9. Block, N. (Ed.) (1980, 1981). Readings in philosophy of psychology (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Bock, R. D. y Wood, R. (1971). Test theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 22, 193-224.
11. Brennan, R. L. (1983). Elements of generalizability theory. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
12. a ed.). Barcelona: Ariel.
13. Campbell, D. T. y Fiske, A. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
14. Campbell, N. R. (1920). Physics. The Elements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Campbell, N. R. (1921). What is science? (Reimpreso). Nueva York: Dover Publications.
16. Campbell, N. R. (1928). An account of the principles of measurement and calculation. Londres: Longmans Green.
17. Campbell, N. R. (1938). Symposium: Measurement and its importance for philosophy. Aristotelian Society, vol. 17 (Suplemento). Londres: Harrison.
18. Campbell, N. R. et al. (1940). Final Report. Advance Science, núm. 2, 331-349.
19. Cattell, J. Mck. (1890). Mental tests and measurements. Mind, 15, 373-380.
20. Coombs, C. H. (1952). A theory of psychological scaling. Engineering Research Bulletin, 34. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
21. Coombs, C. H. (1964). A theory of data. Nueva York: Wiley.
22. Crick, J. E. y Brennan, R. L. (1982). GENOVA. A generalized Analysis of Variance System (FORTRAN IV Computer Program and Manual). Doschester, MA: Computer Facilities, University of Massachusetts at Boston.
23. Crocker, L. y Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
24. Cronbach, L. J. (1947). Test reliability: its meaning and determination. Psychometrika, 12, 1-16.
25. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
26. Cronbach, L. J., Glesser, G. C., Nanda, H. y Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of Behavioral Measurement: Theory of Generalizability for scores and profiles. Nueva York: Wiley.
27. Cronbach, L. J. y Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
28. Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., Glesser, G. C. (1963). Theory of Generalizability: a liberalization of reliability theory. The British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16, 2, 137-163.
29. Egan, J. (1975). Signal detection theory and ROC analysis. Nueva York: Academic Press.
30. Falmage, J. C. (1985). Elements of psychophysical theory. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
31. Fechner, G. T. (1860/1966). Elements of psychophysics. Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
32. Feldt, L. S. y Qualls, A. L. (1996). Estimation of measurement error variance at specific score levels. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33(2), 141-156.
33. Ferrando, P. J. (1996). Evaluación de la unidimensionalidad de los ítems mediante análisis factorial. Psicothema, 8(2), 397-410.
34. Feyerabend, P. (1981). Tratado contra el método. Madrid: Tecnos.
35. Flanagan, J. L. (1937). A note on calculating the standard error of measurement and reliability coefficients with the test score machine. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 529.
36. Franca-Tarragó, O. (1996). Etica para psicólogos. Introducción a la psicoética. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer.
37. Fraser, C. O. (1980). Measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 23-34.
38. Fuentes, J. B. (1994). Introducción del concepto de "conflicto de normas irresuelto personalmente" como figura antropológica (específica) del campo psicológico. Psicothema, 6(3), 421-446.
39. Gaito, J. (1980). Measurement scales and statistics: resurgence of an old misconception. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 564-567.
40. García-Cueto, E. (1993). Introducción a la psicometría. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
41. Gescheider, G. A. (1985). Psychophysics: method, theory, and application. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
42. Glesser, G. C., Cronbach, L. J. y Rajaratnam, N. (1965). Generality of scores influenced by multiple sources of variance. Psychometrika, 30, 395-418.
43. Green, D. M. y Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Nueva York: Wiley.
44. Guilford, J. P. (1936, 1954). Psychometric Methods. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of Mental Tests. Nueva York: Wiley (Reimpreso en 1987).
46. Guttman,L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 255-282.
47. Hambleton, R. K. (1990). Item response theory: introduction and bibliography. Psicothema, 2, 97-107.
48. Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Item response theory: A broad psychometric framework for measurement advances. Psicothema, 6(3), 535-556.
49. Hambleton, R. K. y Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer.
50. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. y Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51. Hanson, N. R. (1969). Perception and discovery. San Francisco: Freeman.
52. Hilbert, D. (1902). Mathematical problems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 8, 437-479.
53. Hölder, O. (1901). Die axiome de quantität die lehre von mass. Berichte lieber die Verhandlugen der Königlich Sachsischen Gessellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathemalisch-Psysische Class, 53, 1-64.
54. Intelligence (1997). Numero especial dedicado a "Intelligence and Social Policy". Intelligence, 24(1).
55. Keith-Spiegel, P. y Koocher, G. P. (1985). Ethics in psychology. Professional standards and cases. Nueva York: Random House.
56. Kendler, H. H. (1981). Psychology: A science in conflict. Nueva York: Oxford.
57. Kimmel, A. J. (1996). Ethical issues in behavioral research. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
58. Krantz, D. H. Luce, R. D., Suppes, P. y Twersky, A. (1971). Foundations of measurement. Vol 1. Additive and polynomial representations. Nueva York: Academic Press.
59. Kuder, G. F. y Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2, 151-160.
60. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61. Lakatos, I. y Musgrave, A. (Eds.) (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Londres: Cambridge University Press.
62. Lawley, D. N. (1943). On problems connected with item selection and test construction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edimburg, 61, 273-287.
63. Linn, R. L. (1997). Evaluating the validity of assessments: the consequences of use. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 14-16.
64. López-Pina, J. A. (1995). Teoría de respuesta al ítem: fundamentos. Barcelona: PPU.
65. Lord, F. M. (1952). A theory of test scores. Psychometric Monographs, n° 7.
66. Lord, F. M. (1953a). An application of confidence intervals of maximum likelihood to the estimation of an examinee's ability. Psychometrika, 18, 57-75.
67. Lord, F. M. (1953b). On the statistical treatment of football numbers. The American Psychologist, 8, 750-751.
68. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
69. Lord, F. M. (1984). Standard errors of measurement at different ability levels. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(3), 239-243.
70. Lord, F. M. y Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental tests scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
71. Luce, R. D. y Narens, L. (1986). The mathematics underlying measurement on the continuum. Science, 236, 1527-1532.
72. Magnuson, D. (1967). Test Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Traducción española: Mexico: Trillas, 1972).
73. Mayor, J. (1989). El método científico en psicología. En J. Arnau y H. Carpintero (Comps.). Tratado de psicología general, Vol. I: Historia, teoría y método. Madrid: Alhambra.
74. Mehrens, W. A. (1997). The consequences of consequential validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 16-18.
75. Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 1012-1027.
76. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. En R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement. Nueva York: Macmillan.
77. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
78. Michell, J. (1986). Measurement scales and statistics: a clash of paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 398-407.
79. Michell, J. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
80. Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355-383.
81. Muñiz, J. (1991). Introducción a los métodos psicofísicos. Barcelona: PPU.
82. a ed.).
83. Muñiz, J. (1996a). Fiabilidad. En J. Muñiz (Coor.), Psicometría. Madrid: Universitas.
84. Muñiz, J. (Coor.). (1996b). Psicometría. Madrid: Universitas.
85. Muñiz, J. (1997). Introducción a la teoría de respuesta a los ítems. Madrid: Pirámide.
86. Muñiz, J. (en prensa). Aspectos éticos y deontológicos de la evaluación psicológica. En Evaluación Psicológica, Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
87. Muñiz, J. y Hambleton, R. K. (1992). Medio siglo de teoría de respuesta a los ítems. Anuario de Psicología, 52, 41-66.
88. Narens, L. (1985). Abstract measurement: the theory of numerical assignment. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 166-180.
89. Narens, L. y Luce, R.D. (1986). Measurement: the theory of numerical assignment. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 166-180.
90. Neisser, U. et al. (1996). Intelligence: knowns and unknows. American Psychologist, 51(2), 77-101.
91. Novick, M. R. (1966). The axioms and principal results of classical test theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 1-18.
92. Olea, J. y Ponsoda, V. (1996). Tests adaptatives informatizados. En J. Muñiz (Coor.), Psicometría. Madrid: Universitas.
93. Paz, M. D. (1994). Teoria de la Generalizabilidad. En J. Muñiz, Teoría clásica de los tests. Madrid: Pirámide.
94. Paz, M. D. (1996). Validez. En J. Muñiz (Coor.), Psicometría. Madrid: Universitas.
95. Paz, M. D. y Muñiz, J. (1989). Potenciales evocados y tiempos de reacción. Psicothema, 1, 97-117.
96. Pfanzagl, J. (1968). Theory of measurement. Nueva York: Wiley.
97. Pinillos, J. L. (1980). Problemas actuales de la psicología científica. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 6, 11-12.
98. Popham, W. J. (1997). Consequential validity: right concern-wrong concept. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 9-13.
99. Popper, K. R. (I959). The logic of scientific discovery. Londres: Hutchinson.
100. Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. Nueva York: Harper.
101. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge. Oxford: Clarenton Press.
102. Qualls, A. L. (1992). A comparison of score level estimates of the standard error of measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29(3), 213-225.
103. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: The Danish Institute for Educational Research.
104. Renom, J. (1993). Tests adaptativos computerizados. Barcelona: PPU.
105. Richardson, M. W. (1936). The relationship between difficulty and the differential validity of a test. Psychometrika, 1, 33-49.
106. Roberts, F. S. (1979). Measurement theory. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
107. Rulon, P. J. (1939). A simplified procedure for determining the reliability of a test by split-halves. Harvard Educational Review 9, 99-103.
108. a Ed.). Nueva York: Norton.
109. Santisteban, C. (1990). Psicometría. Teoría y práctica en la construccción de tests. Madrid: Norma.
110. Savage, L. W. y Ehrlich, R. (Eds.). (1990). Philosophical and foundational issues in measurement theory. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
111. Schmeiser, C. B. (1992). Ethical codes in the professions. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 5-11.
112. Schmidt, F. L. y Hunter, J. E. (1996). Measurement error in psychological research: lessons from 26 research scenarios. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 199-223.
113. Schuler, H. (1982). Ethical problems in psychological research. London: Academic Press.
114. Schwager, K. W. (1991). The representational theory of measurement: an assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 618-626.
115. Shavelson, R. y Webb, N. (1991). Generalizability theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
116. Shavelson, R. Webb, N. y Rowley, G. L. (1989). Generalizability Theory. American Psychologist, 44 (6), 922-932.
117. Shepard, L. A. (1997). The centrality of test use and consequences for test validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 5-8.
118. Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72-101.
119. Spearman, C. (1907). Demonstration of formulae for true measurement of correlation. American Journal of Psychology, 18, 161-169.
120. Spearman, C. (1913). Correlations of sums and differences. British Journal of Psychology, 5, 417-126.
121. Spielberger, C. D. y Vagg, P. R. (Eds.) (1995). Test anxiety. Theory, assessment and treatment. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.
122. Staats, A. W. (1983). Psychology's crisis of desunity. Philosophy and method for a unified science. Nueva York: Praeger.
123. Staats, A. W. y Mos, L. P. (Eds.) (1987). Annals of theoretical psychology. Vol. 5. Nueva York: Plenum Press.
124. Stanley, B. H., Sieber, J. E. y Melton, G. B. (Eds.). (1996). Research ethics. A psychological approach. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
125. Stanley, J. C. (1971). Reliability. En R. L. Thorndike (ed.), Educational Measurement. Washington. DC: American Council on Education.
126. Sternberg, R. J. y Kaufman, J. C. (1996). Innovation and intelligence testing: the curious case of the dog that didn't bark. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 175-182.
127. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677-680.
128. Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics. En S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology. Nueva York: Wiley.
129. Stevens, S. S. (1961). To honor Fechner and repeal his law. Science, 133, 80-86.
130. Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics: introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. Nueva York: Wiley.
131. Stine, W. W. (1989). Meaningful inference: the role of measurement in statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 1, 147-155.
132. Summers, G. F. (Ed.) (1970). Attitude measurement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
133. Suppe, F. (Ed.). The structure of scientific theories. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
134. Suppes, P. y Zinnes, J. L. (1963). Basic measurement theory. En R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush y E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. I, págs. 1-76. Nueva York: Wiley.
135. Sutcliffe, J. P. (1965). A probability model for error of classification, I: General considerations. Psychometrika, 30, 73-96.
136. Swets, J. A. (1996). Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: collected papers. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
137. Thorndike, R. L. (1951). Reliability. En E. L. Lindquist (Ed.), Educational Measurement (págs. 560-620). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
138. Thorndike, R. L. (1982). Applied Psychometrics. Boston: Hougton Mifflin.
139. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
140. Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529-554.
141. Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. Nueva York: Wiley.
142. Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
143. Townsend, J. T. y Ashby, F. G. (1984). Measurement scales and statistics: the misconception misconceived. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 394-401.
144. Traub, R. E. (1994). Reliability for the social sciences: Theory and applications. Londres: Sage.
145. Triandis, H. C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. Nueva York: Wiley.
146. Tucker, L. R. (1946). Maximum validity of a test with equivalent items. Psychometrika, 11, 1-13.
147. Van der Linden, W. J. y Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.
148. Wainer, H. (Ed.). (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: a primer. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
149. Wainer, H. (1993). Measurement problems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(1), 1-21.
150. Wainer, H. y Braun, H. I. (Eds.). (1988). Test validity. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
151. Yela, M. (1984). Introducción a la teoría de los tests. Madrid: Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense.
152. Yela, M. (1987). Toward a unified psychological science. En A. W. Staats y L. P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology. Vol. 5. Nueva York: Plenum Press.
153. Yela, M. (1994). El problema del método científico en psicología. Anuario de Psicología, 60, 3-12.