Set-Valued Utilities for Strict Partial Orders

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 433-440

  Herrero, Carmen ^b   Subiza, Begoña ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Embeddings; Numerical representation; Set valued utility; Strict partial orders

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009959034     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1998.1235     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Border, K. C. (1985). Fixed point theorems with applications to economics and game theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
2. Bosi, G., & Isler, R. (1995). Representing preferences with nontransitive indifference by a single-valued function. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 27, 621-631.
3. Bridges, D. S. (1983). A numerical representation of intransitive preferences on a countable set. Journal of Economic Theory, 30, 213-217.
4. Bridges, D. S. (1986). Numerical representation of interval orders on a topological space. Journal of Economic Theory, 38, 160-166.
5. Chateauneuf, A. (1987). Continuous representation of a preference relation on a connected topological space. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16, 139-146.
6. Doignon, J. P., Ducamp, A., & Falmagne, J.-C. (1984). On realizable biorders and the biorder dimension of a relation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28, 73-109.
7. Elster, J. (1982). Sour grapes utilitarianism and the genesis of wants. In Sen & Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
8. Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Suborders on commodity spaces. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 321-328.
9. Fishburn, P. C. (1973). Interval representations for interval orders and semiorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 144-149.
10. Kelley, J. L. (1955). General topology. New York: van Nostrand.
11. Kreps, D. (1979). A representation theorem for "preference for flexibility." Econometrica, 47, 565-577.
12. Kreps, D. (1988). Notes on the theory of choice. Colorado: Westview Press.
13. Luce, R. D. (1956). Semi-orders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 24, 178-191.
14. Majumdar, M., & Sen, A. K. (1976). A note on representing partial orderings. Review of Economic Studies, 43, 543-545.
15. Pattanaik, P. K. & Xu, Y. (1990). On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice. Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 56, 383-390.
16. Peleg, B. (1970). Utility functions for partially ordered topological spaces. Econometrica, 38, 93-96.
17. Peris, J., & Subiza, B. (1995). A weak utility function for acyclic preferences. Economics Letters, 48, 21-24.
18. Peris, J., & Subiza, B. (1997). Numerical representations for lower quasi-continuous preferences. Mathematical Social Sciences, 33, 149-156.
19. Rader, T. (1963). The existence of a utility function to represent preferences. Review of Economic Studies, 30, 229-232.
20. Richter, M. (1971). Rational choice. In Chipman et al. (Eds.), Preferences, utility and demand, pp. 29-57. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
21. Sen, A. K. (1988). Freedom of choice: Concept and content. European Economic Review, 32, 269-294.
22. Subiza, B. (1994). Numerical representation for acyclic preferences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 467-476.