Attitudes and opinions regarding the use of the internet for continuing education among social workers

Journal of Technology in Human Services

Volumn 18, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 145-169

  Barnett Queen, Timothy ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet and continuing education; Social work license renewal; Technology and continuing education

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009904804     PISSN: 15228835     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J017v18n03_10     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barnett-Queen, T. R. & Zhu, E. (1999). Distance Education: Analysis of learning styles and preferences in two sections of undergraduate Human Growth and Development Course: Face-to-Face and Web-Based Distance Learning. Retrieved from Conference Proceedings database (Third Annual Technology Conference for Social Work Education and Practice, CD-ROM, August, 1999).
2. Burton, D., & Seabury, B. The "virtual" social work course: Promises and pitfalls. New Technology in the Human Services, 12 (3/4), 55-64.
3. Butterfield, W. H. (1998). Human services and the information economy. Computers in Human Services, 75(2/3), 121-142.
4. Giffords, E. D. (1998). Social work on the internet: An introduction. Social Work 43(3), 243-251.
5. Hi 11 man, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30-42.
6. Jennings, J., Siegel, E., & Conklin, J. J. (1995). Social work education and distance learning: Applications for continuing education. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education 6(3), 3-7.
7. Krueger, J E. & Stretch, J. J. (2000). How hypermodern technology in social work education bites back. Journal of Social Work Education, 36(1). Retrieved August 24,2000 from EBSCOhost [38 paragraphs] on the World Wide Web: http://www.ebsco.com.
8. Marson, S. M. (1997). A selective history of Internet technology and social work. Computers in Human Services, 14(2), 35-49.
9. MayaQuest Expedition (1999). http://www.classroom.comJ.
10. Peters, B. B. & Romero, F. W. (1998). Capability of practicing social workers to use the Internet for client services, information and referral, and professional development. Proceedings of the Information Technologies for Social Work Education and Practice, USA (pp. 259-265).
11. Petracchi. H. E. & Morgenbesser, M. ( 1995). The use of video and one-way broadcast technology to deliver continuing social work education: A comparative assessment of student learning. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education 6(3), 18-22.
12. Relan, A. & Gillani, B. B. (1997). Web-based information and the traditional classroom: Similarities and differences. In E. Khan (Ed.), Web-Based Instruction (pp. 41 -47). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, Inc.
13. Siegel, E & Jennings, J. (1998). Distance learning in social work education: Results and implications of a national survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 34(1) 71-81.
14. Thyer, B. A., Polk, G., & Gaudin, J. G. ( 1997). Distance learning in social work education: A preliminary evaluation. Journal of Social Work Education, 33. 363-367.
15. Thyer, B. A. & Artelt, T. (1998). Evaluating distance learning in social work education: A replication study. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 291-295.
16. Wan, D., & Johnson, P. ( 1994). Experiences with CLARE: A computer-supported collaborative learning environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41, 851-879.