Conjuring boundaries: Inferring past identities from religious artifacts

International Journal of Historical Archeology

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 281-313

  Fennell, Christopher C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conjuration; Diagnostic artifacts; Ethnicity; Folk religion

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009897344     PISSN: 10927697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Adams, E. (1994). Religion and freedom: Artifacts indicate that African culture persisted even in slavery. African-American Archaeology 11: 1-2.
2. Bacon, A. M., and Herron L. (1896). Conjuring and conjure-doctors in the Southern United States. Journal of American Folklore 9: 143-147.
3. Barth, F. (1998a) [1969]. Introduction. In Barth. F. (ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Illinois, pp. 9-38 (originally published 1969; reissued 1998).
4. Barth, F. (1998b) [1969]. Pathan identity and its maintenance. In Barth, F. (ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference, Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Illinois, pp. 117-134.
5. Baugher, S., and Venables, R. W. (1987). Ceramics as indicators of status and class in eighteenth-century New York. In Spencer-Wood, S. (ed.), Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology, Plenum, New York, pp. 31-53.
6. Summers, M. (ed. and transi.) (1970). Malleus Maleficarum, Benjamin Blom, New York.
7. Tambiah, S. J. (1990). Magic, Science, Religion and the Scope of Rationality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Thomas, B. W. (1994). Inclusion and exclusion in the Moravian settlement in North Carolina, 1770-1790. Historical Archaeology 28(3): 15-29.