A proposed framework for computational fluid dynamics code calibration/validation

AIAA 25th Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, 1994

Volumn , Issue , 1994, Pages

  Oberkampf, William L ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS; CALIBRATION; FORECASTING; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; NUCLEAR REACTORS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; TERMINOLOGY;

CODE VALIDATION; CODE VERIFICATION; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS CODES; NUCLEAR REACTOR ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL PREDICTIONS; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; PHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS; SOLUTION ACCURACY;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 0009892230     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.1994-2540     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. American Nuclear Society, 1987, “Guidelines for the Verification and Validation of Scientific and Engineering Computer Programs for the Nuclear Industry,” ANSI/ANS-10.4-1987.
2. D. A. Anderson, J. C. Tannehill, and R. H. Pletcher, 1984, Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Taylor & Francis.
3. B. F. Armaly, F. Durst, J. C. F. Pereira, and B. Shoenung, 1983,”Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Backward-Facing Step Flow,” J. of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 127, pp. 473-496.
4. F. G. Blottner, 1990, “Accurate Navier-Stokes Results for the Hypersonic Flow Over a Spherical Nosetip,” J. of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 113-I22.
5. B. W. Boehm, 1981, Software Engineering Economics, Prentice-Hall, p. 37.
6. R. G. Bradley, 1986, “Current Capabilities and Future Directions in Computational Fluid Dynamics,” National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
7. R. G. Bradley, 1988, “CFD Validation Philosophy,” AGARD Symposium on Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Conf. Paper No. 1, Lisbon, Portugal.
8. R. R. Cosner, 1994, “Issues in Aerospace Application of CFD Analysis,” AIAA Paper No. 94-0464, AIAA 32th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.
9. J. H. Ferziger, 1993, “Estimation and Reduction of Numerical Error,” FED-Vol. 158, Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics, ASME Fluids Engineering Conf., Washington, DC., pp. 1-7.
10. C. J. Freitas, 1993, editor, “The CFD Triathlon: Three Laminar Flow Simulations by Commercial CFD Codes,” ASME Fluids Engineering Conf., Washington, DC.
11. R. A. Graves, 1992, “Software Validation: The Bridge from R&D to Industrial Application,” AIAA Paper No. 92-0587, AIAA 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.
12. M. J. Green, S. L. Lawrence, A. D. Dilley, R. W. Hawkins, M. A. Walker and W. L. Oberkampf, 1993, “Application of CFD to a Generic Hypersonic Flight Research Study,” AIAA Paper No. 93-0312, AIAA 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.
13. J.W. Gresho, P. M., D. K. Gartling, J. R. Torczynski, K. A. Cliffe, K. H. Winters, T. J. Garratt, A. Spence, and J. W. Goodrich, 1993, “Is the Steady Viscous Incompressible Two-Dimensional Flow Over a Backward-Facing Step at Re = 800 Stable?” Intl. J, Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 17, pp. 501-541.
14. W. D. Hayes and R. F. Probstein, 1966, Hypersonic Flow Theory; Vol. 1, Inviscid Flows, Academic Press.
15. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1984, F. Jay, editor, “IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms,” ANSI/IEEE Std. 100-1984.
16. International Organization for Standardization, 1993, “Quality management and quality assurance standards--Part 3: Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001 to the development, supply and maintenance of software,” ISO 9000-3:1991(E).
17. K. Karamcheti, 1966, Principles of Ideal-Fluid Aerodynamics, Wiley.
18. A. Martellucci, 1990, “The Challenging Process of Validating CFD Codes,” AIAA Paper No. 90-1402, AIAA 16th Aerodynamic Ground Testing Conf., Seattle, WA.
19. J. G. Marvin, 1988, “Accuracy Requirements and Benchmark Experiments for CFD Validation,” AGARD Symposium on Validation of Computa­tional Fluid Dynamics, Conf. Paper No. 2, Lisbon, Portugal.
20. J. G. Marvin and T. L. Hoist, 1990, “CFD Validation for Aerodynamic Flows: Challenge for the 90’s,” AIAA Paper No. 90-2995, AIAA 16th Aerodynamic Ground Testing Conf., Portland OR.
21. U. B. Mehta, 1990, “Computational Requirements for Hypersonic Flight Performance Estimates,” J, of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 103-112.
22. U. B. Mehta, 1991, “Some Aspects of Uncertainty in ComputationaI Fluid Dynamics Results,” J. of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 113, pp. 538-543.
23. U. B. Mehta, 1993, “Aerospace Plane Design Challenge: Credible Computations,” J. of Aircraft, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 519-525.
24. R. D. Neumann, 1990, “CFD Validation--The Interaction of Experimental Capabilities and Numerical Computations,” AIAA Paper No. 90-3030, AIAA 16th Aerodynamic Ground Testing Conf., Portland, OR.
25. W. L. Oberkampf and D. P. Aeschliman, 1992, “Joint Computational/Experimental Aerodynamics Research on a Hypersonic Vehicle: Part 1, Experimental Results,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 2000-2009.
26. R. L. Panton, 1984, Incompressible Flow, Wiley.
27. P. J. Roache, 1993, “A Method for Uniform Reporting of Grid Refinement Studies,” FED-Vol. 158, Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational FIuid Dynamics, ASME Fluids Engineering Conf., Washington, DC., pp. 109-120.
28. K. Shimazaki, Y. Himeno, and N. Baba, 1993, “An Attempt at Evaluating Numerical Errors in a 2-D Navier-Stokes Solver,” FED-Vol. 158, Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics, ASME Fluid Engineering Conf., Washington, DC., pp. 19-28.
29. M. A. Walker and W. L. Oberkampf, 1992, “Joint Computational/Experimental Aerodynamics Research on a Hypersonic Vehicle: Part 2, Computational Results,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 2010-2016.
30. C. Y. Wang, 1991, “Exact Solutions of the Steady-State Navier-Stokes Equations,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 23, pp. 159-177.