Strategic spillovers and incentives for research and development

Management Science

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 907-925

  Harhoff, Dietmar ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

Author keywords

Innovation; Knowledge Spillovers; Research and Development

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009891969     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.42.6.907     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch, "Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size," Rev. Economics and Statistics, 69 (1987), 567-574.
2. _ and _, "Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis," American Economic Review, 78 (1988), 678-690.
3. Allen, R. G. B., Mathematical Analysis for Economists, Macmillan, London, 1938.
4. Arrow, K. J., "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," in R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1962, 609-626.
5. Becker, G. S. and K. M. Murphy, "The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge," Quarterly J. Economics, 107 (1992), 1137-1160.
6. Bernstein, J. I., "Costs of Production, Intra and Interindustry R&D Spillovers: Canadian Evidence," Canadian J. Economics, 21 (1988), 324-347.
7. _ and M. I. Nadiri, "Interindustry R&D Spillovers, Rates of Return, and Production in High-Tech Industries," AEA Papers and Proceedings, 78 (1988), 429-434.
8. Binswanger, H. P. and V. W. Ruttan, Induced Innovation - Technology, Institutions, and Development, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1978.
9. Bronfenbrenner, M., "Notes on the Elasticity of Derived Demand," Oxford Economic Papers, 13 (1961), 254-261.
10. Caves, R. E., H. Crookell, and J. P. Killing, "The Imperfect Market for Technology Licenses," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 45 (1983), 223-248.
11. Cohen, W. M. and R. C. Levin, "Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure," in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (Eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989, 1060-1107.
12. _ and D. A. Levinthal, "Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D," Economic J., 99 (1989), 569-596.
13. Corey, E. R., "The Development of Markets for New Materials," Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 1956.
14. Dasgupta, P. and J. Stiglitz, "Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity," Economic J., 90 (1980), 266-293.
15. Dixit, A., "Quality and Quantity Competition," Rev. Economics and Statistics, 46 (1979), 587-599.
16. Geroski, Paul A., "Vertical Relations Between Firms and Industrial Policy," Economic J., 102 (1992), 138-147.
17. Graham, M. B. W. and B. H. Pruitt, R&D for Industry - A Century of Technical Innovation at Alcoa, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
18. Griliches, Z., "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth," Bell J. Economics, 10 (1979), 92-116.
19. Harhoff, D., Strategic Spillover Production, Vertical Organization, and Incentives for Research and Development. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1991a.
20. _, "Innovation, Oligopoly, and Derived Demand," mimeo, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim, Germany, 1991b.
21. Koenker, R. W. and M. K. Perry, "Product Differentiation, Monopolistic Competition, and Public Policy," Bell J. Economics, 12 (1981), 217-231.
22. Kogut, B. and U. Zander, "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology," Organization Sci., 3 (1992), 383-397.
23. Lee, T. K. and L. L. Wilde, "Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation," Quarterly J. Economics, 94 (1980), 429-436.
24. Leenders, M. R. and D. L. Blenkhorn, Reverse Marketing - The New Buyer-Supplier Relationship, Free Press, New York, 1988.
25. Levin, R. C., W. M. Cohen, and D. C. Mowery, "R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses," AEA Papers and Proceedings, 75 (1985), 20-24.
26. _ and P. C. Reiss, "Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R&D with Spillovers," Rand J. Economics, 19 (1988), 538-556.
27. _ and _, "Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure," in Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984, 175-208.
28. Loury, G. C., "Market Structure and Innovation," Quarterly J. Economics, 43 (1979), 395-410.
29. Mathewson, G. F. and R. A. Winter, "An Economic Theory of Vertical Restraints," Rand J. of Economics, 15 (1984), 27-38.
30. Mishina, K., Essays on Technological Evolution, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1989.
31. Nelson, R. R., "Production Sets, Technological Knowledge, and R&D: Fragile and Overworked Constructs for Analysis of Productivity Growth?," AEA Papers and Proceedings, 70 (1980), 62-67.
32. _, "The Role of Knowledge in R&D Efficiency," Quarterly J. Economics, 97 (1982), 453-470.
33. Pavitt, K., "Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory," Res. Policy, 13 (1984), 343-373.
34. Peck, M. J., "Inventions in the Postwar American Aluminum Industry," in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1962, 279-298.
35. Polanyi, M., Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1958.
36. Rosenberg, N., Inside the Black Box - Technology and Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
37. Sato, R. and T. Koizumi, "Substitutability, Complementarity, and the Theory of Derived Demand," Review of Economic Studies, 39 (1970), 107-118.
38. Scherer, F. M., "Demand-Pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited," J. Industrial Economics, 30, 3 (1982), 225-237.
39. _, "Using Linked Patent and R&D Data to Measure Interindustry Technology Flows," in: Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1984, 417-464.
40. _ and D. Ross, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 1990.
41. Spence, A. M., "Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance," Econometrica, 52 (1984), 101-121.
42. Steiner, R. L., "The Nature of Vertical Restraints," Antitrust Bulletin, 30 (1985), 143-197.
43. Tandon, P., "Rivalry and Excessive Allocation of Resources to Research," Bell J. Economics, 14 (1983), 152-165.
44. _, "Innovation, Market Structure, and Welfare," American Economic Review, 74 (1984), 394-403.
45. Teece, D. J., "Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How," Economic J., 87 (1977), 242-261.
46. Tirole, J., The Theory of Industrial Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
47. VanderWerf, P.A., "Explaining Downstream Innovation by Commodity Suppliers with Expected Innovation Benefit," Res. Policy, 21 (1992), 315-333.
48. Varian, H. R., Microeconomic Analysis, Norton, New York, 1984.
49. von Hippel, E., "Appropriability of Innovation Benefit as a Predictor of the Source of Innovation," Res. Policy, 11 (1982), 95-115.
50. _, The Sources of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, 1988.
51. _, " 'Sticky Information' and the Locus of Problem-Solving: Implications for Innovation," Management Sci., 40 (1994), 429-439.
52. Waterson, M., "Oligopoly and Derived Demand," Economics Letters, 5 (1980), 115-118.
53. Winter, S. G., "Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes," J. Economic Behavior and Organization, 5 (1984), 287-320.