Internet use and gender at emory & henry college: A survey of student users

College and Undergraduate Libraries

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 1-9

  Mitchell, Felicia ^a  

^a EMORY AND HENRY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet; Internet and gender; Internet and small college libraries; Internet usage survey

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009891371     PISSN: 10691316     EISSN: 15452530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J106v05n02_01     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bender, Robert M., 1995. “Creating Communities on the Internet:Electronic Discussion Lists in the Classroom”. Computers in Libraries, 15(5) May:38–43.
2. He, Peter Wei, and Jacobson, Trudi E., 1996. “What Are They Doing With The Internet? A Study Of User Information Seeking Behaviors”. Internet Services Quarterly, 1(1):31–51.
3. Herring, Susan. 1994. “Gender Differences In Computer-Mediated Communication:Bringing Familiar Baggage To The New Frontier”. Paper Presented at the American Library Association National Convention. June271994, Miami. Available:http://www.eff.org/pub/Net_culture/Gender_issues/cmc_and_gender.article
4. Pitkow, Jim, and Kehoe, Colleen. “GVU's WWW User Survey”, Georgia Institute of Technology. Available:http://www.cc.gatech/edu/gvu/users_surveys
5. Reinen, Ingeborg, and Plomp, Tjeerd. 1993. “Some Gender Issues In Educational Computer Use:Results Of An International Comparative Study”. Computers and Education, 20(4):353–365.
6. Sacks, Colin H., Bellisimo, Yolanda, and Bergendoller, John. 1993. “Attitudes Toward Computers and Computer Use:The Issue of Gender”. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26 Winter:256–267. 94
7. Shade, Leslie Regan. 1993. “Gender Issues In Computer Networking”. Paper Presented at the International Free-Net Conference, Carleton University. August17–191993, Ottawa, Canada. Available:http://alfred.carleton.ca/filepub/freenet/93conference/papers/leslie_regan_shade.txt
8. Turkle, Sherry, and Papert, Seymour. 1990. “Epistemological Pluralism:Styles and Voices Within the Computer Culture”. Signs, 16(1):128–157.