Animal rights talk: Moral debate over the internet

Qualitative Sociology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 399-418

  Herzog Jr , Harold A ^a   Dinoff, Beth ^a   Page, Jessica R ^a  

^a WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal research; Animal rights movement; e mail

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009876365     PISSN: 01620436     EISSN: 15737837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024783401031     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Suarez, S. D. (1987). Antivivisection: Questions of logic, consistency, and conceptualization. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 7, 81-93.
2. Galvin, S., & Herzog, H.A., Jr. (1992). Ethical ideology, animal activism and attitudes toward the treatment of animals. Ethics & Behavior, 2, 141-149.
3. Gluck, J. P., & Kubacki, S. R. (1991). Animals in biomedical research: The undermining effect of the rhetoric of the besieged. Ethics and Behavior, 1, 157-173.
4. Goode, J., & Johnson, M. (1991). Putting out the flames: The etiquette and law of e-mail. Online, 15, 61-65.
5. Guillermo, K. S. (1993). Monkey business: The disturbing case that launched the animal rights movement. Bethesda: National Press.
6. Herzog, H. A. (1993a). Human morality and animal research. The American Scholar, 62, 337-349.
7. Herzog, H. A. (1993b). "The movement is my life": The psychology of animal rights activism. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 103-119.
8. Jamison, W., & Lunch, W. (1992). The rights of animals, science policy and political activism. Science Technology and Human Values, 17, 438-458.
9. Jasper, J. M., & Nelkin, D. (1992). The animal rights crusade: The growth of a moral protest. New York: The Free Press.
10. Orians, F. B. (1993). In the name of science: Issues in responsible animal experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Paul, E. (1995). Us and them: Scientists' and animal rights campaigner's views of the animal experimentation debate. Society and Animals, 3, 1-21.
12. Perry, T. S. (1992). Forces for social change. IEEE Spectrum, 29, 30-32.
13. Perry, T. S., & Adam, J. A. (1992). E-mail: Pervasive and persuasive. IEEE Spectrum, 29, 22-23.
14. Plous, S. (1991). An attitude survey of animal rights activists. Psychological Science, 2, 194-196.
15. Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley, University of California Press.
16. Rheingold, H. (1991). Electronic democracy: The great equalizer. Whole Earth Review, 71, 4-8.
17. Richards, R., & Krannich, R. (1991). The ideology of the animal rights movement and activists' attitudes toward wildlife. Transactions of the 56th N.A. Wildlife Conference, 363-371.
18. Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation. New York: Avon.
19. Sutherland, A., & Nash, J. E. (1994). Animal rights as a new environmental cosmology. Qualitative Sociology, 17, 171-186.
20. Sperling, S. (1988). Animal Liberators: Research and Morality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21. U.S. Department of Justice. (1993). Report to Congress on the extent and effects of domestic and international terrorism on animal enterprises. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.