Parcel-based approaches to the classification of fine spatial resolution imagery: Example methodologies using HRSC-A data

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives

Volumn 33, Issue , 2000, Pages 1423-1430

  Smith, Geoffrey M ^a   Hoffmann, Andrea ^b  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Classification; Fine spatial resolution; HRSC A; Per parcel; Scene components

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; FORESTRY; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE RESOLUTION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PIXELS; REMOTE SENSING; STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING;

HIGH RESOLUTION STEREO CAMERA; HRSC-A; PER-PARCEL; SCENE COMPONENTS; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SPATIAL RESOLUTION IMAGERY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION IMAGES; SPECTRAL SEPARABILITY;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 0009753839     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Aplin, P., Atkinson, P.M. and Curran, P.J., 1997, Fine spatial resolution satellite sensors for the next decade. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 3873-3881.
2. Aplin, P., Atkinson, P.M. and Curran, P.J., 1999. Fine spatial resolution simulated satellite sensor imagery for land cover mapping in the United Kingdom. Remote Sensing of Environment, 68, 206-216.
3. Barr, S. and Barnsley, M.J., 1999, Improving the quality of very high spatial resolution remotely-sensed land cover maps for the inference of urban land use maps. Proceeding of the 25th Annual Conference of the Remote Sensing Society: RSS '99 - From Data to Information, University of Wales, Cardiff, UK, 8-11 Sep 1999, 111-118.
4. Bruniquel-Pinel, V. and Gastellu-Etchegorry, J.P., 1998. Sensitivity of texture of high resolution images of forest and acquisition parameters. Remote Sensing of Environment, 65, 61-85.
5. Fritz, L.E., 1996. The era of commercial Earth observation satellites. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62, 39-45.
6. Gastella-Etchegorry, J.P, 1990. An assessment of the SPOT XS and Landsat MSS data for digital classification of near-urban land cover. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 11, 225-235.
7. Gong P., Miller, J.R. and Spanner, M., 1994. Forest canopy closure from classification and spectral unmixing of scene components - multisensor evaluation of an open canopy. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32, 1067-1080.
8. Konecny, G., 1999. The Impact of High Resolution Satellite Data on the Operationalisation of Remote Sensing for Mapping from Space. In: Proc. 2nd International Symposium on Operationalisation of Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition, CD.
9. th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Ann Arbor, MI, 1075-1090.
10. Neukum, G., 1999. The Airborne HRSC-A: Performance Results and Aplication Potential. In: Photogrammetric Week, 99, eds. D. Fritsch and D. Spiller. Wichmann, Heidelberg, Germany.
11. Renouard, L. and Lehmann, F., 1999. High Resolution Digital Surface Models and Orthoimages for Telecom Network Planning. In: Photogrammetric Week, 99, eds. D. Fritsch and D. Spiller. Wichmann, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 241-247.
12. Smith, G.M. and Fuller, R.M. 2000. Per-parcel classification of land cover in Jersey. International Journal of Remote Sensing, In press.
13. Toll, D.L., 1984. An evaluation of simulated Thematic Mapper data and Landsat MSS data for discriminating suburban and regional land use and land cover. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 50, 1713-1724.
14. Wewel, F. and Scholten, F., 1999. High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC): Multispectral Data Acquisition and Photogrammetric Data Processing. In: Proc. 4th International Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition, Vol. I, pp 263-271.
15. Woodcock, C.E. and Strahler, A.H., 1987. The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 21, 311-332.