Abuse of Dominance under the 1986 Canadian Competition Act

Review of Industrial Organization

Volumn 13, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 85-129

  Church, Jeffrey ^a   Ware, Roger ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009714511     PISSN: 0889938X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007735104134     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson, R. D. and S. D. Kholsa (1987) 'Reflections on McDonald on Abuse of Dominant Position', Canadian Competition Policy Record, 8, 51-60.
2. Anderson, R. D., S. D. Kholsa, and J. Monteiro (1996) 'Market Definition in Abuse of Dominant Position Cases under the Canadian Competition Act', Mimeo Competition Bureau, Industry Canada.
3. Areeda, P. (1990) 'Essential Facilities: An Epithet in Need of Limiting Principles', Antitrust Law Journal, 58, 841-853.
4. Areeda, P. E. and D. L. Turner (1975) 'Predatory Pricing and Related Practices Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act', Hanard Law Review, 88, 697-733.
5. Baker, J. B. 1996. 'Vertical Restraints with Horizontal Consequences: Competitive Effects of 'Most-Favored-Customer Clauses', Antitrust Law Journal, 64, 517-534.
6. Baziliauskas, A. and B. Rivard (1996) 'Impeding Toe-Hold Entry Through Exclusive Contracts', Mimeo, Competition Bureau, Industry Canada.
7. Carlton, D. W. and A. S. Frankel (1995a) 'The Antitrust Economics of Credit Card Networks', Antitrust Law Journal, 63, 643-668.
8. Carlton, D. W. and A. S. Frankel (1995b) 'The Antitrust Economics of Credit Card Networks: Reply to Evans and Schmalensee Comment', Antitrust Law Journal, 63, 903-916.
9. Cochlan, M. (1995) 'Branded Ingredient Strategies', Unpublished MA Thesis, University of Calgary.
10. Collins, P. J. (1991) 'The Law and Economics of "Abuse of Dominant Position": An Analysis of NutraSweet', University of Toronto Faculty Law Review, 49, 276-293.
11. Cooper, T. E. (1986) 'Most-Favored-Customer Pricing and Tacit Collusion', Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 377-388.
12. Crocker, K. J. and T. P. Lyon (1994) 'What Do "Facilitating Practices" Facilitate? An Empirical Investigation of Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses in Natural Gas Contracts', Journal of Law and Economics, XXXVII, 297-322.
13. Evans, D. S. and R. Schmalensee (1995) 'Economic Aspects of Payment Card Systems and Antitrust Policy Toward Joint Ventures', Antitrust Law Journal, 63, 861-902.
14. Graham, B. M. (1993) 'Abuse of Dominance-Recent Case Law: NutraSweet and Laidlaw', McGill Law Journal, 38, 800-829.
15. Green, C. (1990) Canadian Industrial Organization, Third Edition. Toronto: McGraw-Hill-Ryerson.
16. Hay, G. A. (1994) 'Practices That Facilitate Cooperation: The Ethyl Case (1984)', in J. E. Kwoka, Jr. and L. J. White, eds, The Antitrust Revolution: The Role of Economics, Second Edition. New York: Harper Collins, pp. 189-213.
17. Klein, B., R. A. Crawford, and A. A. Alchian (1978) 'Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process', Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 297-326.
18. Martin, R. L. and B. Martin (1987) 'Abuse of Dominance or Abuse of Reason', Canadian Competition Policy Record, 8, 61-67.
19. Mathewson, G. F. and R. Winter (1987) 'The Competitive Effects of Vertical Agreements: Comment', American Economic Review, 77, 1057-62.
20. Mathewson, G. F. and R. Winter (1996) 'Tying as a Response to Demand Uncertainty', Mimeo, University of Toronto.
21. Maule, C. and T. Ross (1989) 'Canada's New Competition Policy', The George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, 23, 59-109.
22. McDonald, B. C. (1987) 'Abuse of Dominant Position', Canadian Competition Policy Record, 8, 59-67.
23. Musgrove, J. (1995) 'Use and Abuse of Dominance: A Brief Review after NutraSweet, Laidlaw, and Nielsen', Canadian Competition Record, Autumn, 52-63.
24. Ordover, J. A. and G. Saloner (1989) 'Predation, Monopolization, and Antitrust', in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds, Handbook of Industrial Organization. New York: North Holland, pp. 537-596.
25. Ordover, J. A. and R. D. Willig (1981) 'An Economic Definition of Predation: Pricing and Product Innovation', Yale Law Journal, 91, 8-53.
26. Perry, M. (1989) 'Vertical Integration: Determinants and Effects', in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds, Handbook of Industrial Organization. New York: North Holland, pp. 183-255.
27. Quinn, J. J. and G. F. Leslie (1996) Essential Facilities and the Duty to Facilitate Competition, Mimeo Blake, Cassels & Graydon Toronto.
28. Reschenthaler, G. B. and W. T. Stanbury (1977) 'Benign Monopoly: Canadian Merger Policy and the K.C. Irving Case', Canadian Business Law Journal, 2, 135-168.
29. Roberts, R. J. (1991) 'Abuse of Dominant Position: From Bork to Bain and Back Again (But this Time with Extraterritoriality)', in R. S. Khemani and W. T. Stanbury, eds, Canadian Competition Law and Policy at the Centenary. Halifax: Institute for Research on Public Policy, pp. 337-348.
30. Roberts, R. J. (1992) Roberts on Competition/Antitrust: Canada and the United States, Second Edition. Toronto: Butterworths.
31. Rosenbluth, G. (1979) 'Monopoly and Monopolization', in J. R. Prichard, W. T. Stanbury and T. A. Wilson, eds, Canadian Competition Policy. Toronto: Butterworths, pp. 329-344.
32. Salinger, M. (1988) 'Vertical Mergers and Market Foreclosure', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 445-456.
33. Salop, S. (1986) 'Practices that (Credibly) Facilitate Oligopoly Coordination', in J. Stiglitz and F. G. Mathewson, eds, New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
34. Schwartz, M. (1989) 'Investments in Oligopoly: Welfare Effects and Tests for Predation', Oxford Economic Papers, 41, 698-719.
35. Stanbury, W. T. (1978) 'Monopoly, Monopolization and Joint Monopolization: Policy Development and Bill C-13', in J. W. Rowley and W. T. Stanbury, eds, Competition Policy in Canada: Stage II, Bill C-13. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, pp. 133-176.
36. Stanbury, W. T. (1985) 'Half a Loaf: Bill C-29, Proposed Amendments to the Combines Investigation Act', Canadian Business Law Journal, 10, 1-34.
37. Stanbury, W. T. (1986-87) 'The New Competition Act and Competition Tribunal Act: "Not With a Bang, But a Whimper"', Canadian Business Law Journal, 12, 2-42.
38. Stanbury, W. T. and G. B. Reschenthaler (1977) 'Oligopoly and Conscious Parallelism: Theory, Policy and the Canadian Cases', Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 15, 617-700.
39. Stocking, G. and W. Mueller (1955) 'The Cellophane Case and the New Competition', American Economic Review, 45, 29-63.
40. Thompson, D. N. (1986) 'The "Abuse of Dominant Position" Provisions', in W. Block, ed, Reaction: The New Combines Investigation Act. Vancouver: Fraser Institute, pp. 157-169.
41. Thompson, D. N. (1991a) 'Monopolization and Abuse of Dominant Position: The Unanswered Questions', in R. S. Khemani and W. T. Stanbury, eds, Canadian Competition Law and Policy at the Centenary. Halifax: Institute for Research on Public Policy, pp. 315-336.
42. Thompson, D. N. (1991b) 'NutraSweet: The Evolution of Law on Abuse of Dominant Position', Canadian Business Law Journal, 18, 17-42.
43. Tirole, J. (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
44. Turner, D. (1956) 'Antitrust Policy and the Cellophane Case', Harvard Law Review, 70, 281-318.
45. Williams, P. L. (1994) 'The Exercise of Market Power: Its Treatment under the Australian and New Zealand Statutes', Review of Industrial Organization, 9, 607-626.
46. Williamson, O. E. (1989) 'Transaction Cost Economics', in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig, eds, Handbook of Industrial Organization. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 135-182.