Auditory Processing of Polymorphemic Pseudowords

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 255-271

  Wurm, Lee H ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Lexical decision; Morphology language; Semantic transparency; Speech perception; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009642006     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2678     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aiken L. S., West S. G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. 1991;Sage, Newbury Park.
2. Anderson S. R. Morphology as a parsing problem. Linguistics. 26:1988;521-544.
3. Anshen F., Aronoff M. Morphological productivity and phonological transparency. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 26:1981;63-72.
4. Aronoff M. Word formation in generative grammar. 1976;MIT Press, Cambridge.
5. Baayen R. H. Productivity in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;447-469.
6. Baayen, R. H, Piepenbrock, R, &, van Rijn, H. 1993. The CELEX lexical database. [CD-ROM].
7. Bergman M. W., Hudson P. T. W., Eling P. A. T. M. How simple complex words can be: Morphological processing and word representations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 40A:1988;41-72.
8. Bloomfield L. Language. 1933;Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
9. Burnage G. CELEX: A guide for users. 1990;CELEX, Nijmegen.
10. Butterworth B. Lexical representation. Butterworth B. Language production: Development, writing, and other language processes. 1983;257-294 Academic Press, New York.
11. Bybee J. L. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. 1985;Benjamins, Philadelphia.
12. Bybee J. L. Morphology as lexical organization. Hammond M., Noonan M. Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics. 1988;119-141 Academic Press, New York.
13. Bybee J. L. Diachronic and typological properties of morphology and their implications for representation. Feldman L. B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995a;225-246 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
14. Bybee J. L. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes. 10:1995b;425-455.
15. Caramazza A., Laudanna A., Romani C. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition. 28:1988;297-332.
16. Chomsky N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. 1965;MIT Press, Cambridge.
17. Cohen J., Cohen P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1983;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
18. Coolen R., van Jaarsveld H., Schreuder R. The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition. 19:1991;341-352.
19. Cutler A., Hawkins J. A., Gilligan G. The suffixing preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics. 23:1985;723-758.
20. Cutler A., Norris D. G. Monitoring sentence comprehension. Cooper W. E., Walker E. C. T. Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. 1979;113-134 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
21. Cutler A., Norris D. The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 14:1988;113-121.
22. Dennet D. C. The intentional stance. 1987;MIT Press, Cambridge.
23. Emmorey K. D. Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes. 4:1989;73-92.
24. Forster K. I. Computational modeling and elementary process analysis in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 20:1994;1292-1310.
25. Francis W. N., Kučera H. Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. 1982;Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
26. Frauenfelder U. H., Schreuder R. Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity. Booij G. E., Van Marle J. Yearbook of morphology 1991. 1992;165-183 Kluwer, Dordrecht.
27. Goldinger S. D., Luce P. A., Pisoni D. B. Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language. 28:1989;501-518.
28. Grosjean F., Gee J. Prosodic structure and spoken word recognition. Cognition. 25:1987;135-155.
29. Henderson L. Toward a psychology of morphemes. Ellis A. W. Progress in the psychology of language. 1985;15-72 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
30. Henderson L., Wallis J., Knight K. Morphemic structure and lexical access. Bouma H., Bouwhuis D. G. Attention and performance: Control of language processes. 1984;211-226 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
31. Jackendoff R. Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language. 51:1975;639-671.
32. Jarvella R. J., Meijers G. Recognizing morphemes in spoken words: some evidence for a stem-organised mental lexicon. Flores d'Arcais G. B., Jarvella R. J. The process of language understanding. 1983;81-112 Wiley, London.
33. Kempley S., Morton J. The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology. 73:1982;441-454.
34. Laudanna, A, &, Burani, C. 1995, Distributional properties of derivational affixes: Implications for processing. In, L. B. Feldman, (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing, (pp, 345, - 364), Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
35. Laudanna A., Burani C., Cermele A. Prefixes as processing units. Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;295-316.
36. Laudanna A., Cermele A., Caramazza A. Morpho-lexical representations in naming. Language and Cognitive Processes. 12:1997;49-66.
37. Libben G. Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequence for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language. 61:1998;30-44.
38. Luce P. A., Pisoni D. B., Goldinger S. D. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. Altmann G. T. M. Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. 1990;122-147 MIT Press, Cambridge.
39. Lyons J. Semantics. 1977;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
40. MacKay D. G. Derivational rules and the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 17:1978;61-71.
41. Marslen-Wilson W. D. Function and process in spoken word recognition. Bouma H., Bouwhuis D. G. Attention and performance: Control of language processes. 1984;125-150 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
42. Marslen-Wilson W. D. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition. 25:1987;71-102.
43. Marslen-Wilson W. D., Tyler L. K., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review. 101:1994;3-33.
44. Marslen-Wilson W., Welsh A. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology. 10:1978;29-63.
45. McClelland J. L., Elman J. L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology. 18:1986;1-86.
46. McQueen J. M., Cutler A., Briscoe T., Norris D. Models of continuous speech recognition and the contents of the vocabulary. Language and Cognitive Processes. 10:1995;309-331.
47. McQueen J. M., Norris D., Cutler A. Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words within other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 20:1994;621-638.
48. Morton J. The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review. 76:1969;165-178.
49. Morton J. Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. Kolers P. A., Wrolstad M. E., Bouma H. Processing of visible language. 1979;259-268 Plenum, New York.
50. Norris D. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition. 52:1994;189-234.
51. Norris D., McQueen J. M., Cutler A. Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21:1995;1209-1228.
52. Radeau M., Morais J., Mousty P., Saerens M., Bertelson P. A listener's investigation of printed word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18:1992;861-871.
53. Rubin G. S., Becker C. A., Freeman R. H. Morphological structure and its effects on visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 18:1979;399-412.
54. Rueckl J. G., Mikolinski M., Raveh M., Miner C. S., Mars F. Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks. Journal of Memory and Language. 36:1997;382-405.
55. Sandra D. The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;227-269.
56. Scalise S. Generative morphology. 1984;Foris, Cinnaminson.
57. Schreuder R., Baayen R. H. Prefix stripping re-revisited. Journal of Memory and Language. 33:1994;357-375.
58. Schreuder R., Baayen R. H. Modeling morphological processing. Feldman L. B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;131-154 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
59. Schreuder R., Flores d'Arcais G. B. Psycholinguistic issues in the lexical representation of meaning. Marslen-Wilson W. D. Lexical representation and process. 1989;409-436 MIT Press, Cambridge.
60. Seidenberg M. S. Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy. Coltheart M. Attention and performance: The psychology of reading. 1987;245-263 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
61. Seidenberg M. S. Reading complex words. Carlson G. N., Tanenhaus M. K. Linguistic structure in language processing. 1989;53-105 Reidel, Amsterdam.
62. Selkirk E. O. The syntax of words. 1982;MIT Press, Cambridge.
63. Siegel D. Topics in English morphology. 1979;Garland, New York.
64. Smith P. T. How to conduct experiments with morphologically complex words. Linguistics. 26:1988;699-714.
65. Smith P. T., Sterling C. M. Factors affecting the perceived morphemic structure of written words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 21:1982;704-721.
66. Stanners R. F., Neiser J. J., Painton S. Memory representation for prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 18:1979;733-743.
67. Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. Using multivariate statistics. 1989;Harper Collins, New York.
68. Taft M. Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 20:1981;289-297.
69. Taft M. The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphographic approach. Besner D., Waller T. G., Mackinnon G. E. Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. 1985;83-123 Academic Press, New York.
70. Taft M. Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;271-294.
71. Taft M., Forster K. I. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 14:1975;638-647.
72. Taft M., Hambly G., Kinoshita S. Visual and auditory recognition of prefixed words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 38A:1986;351-366.
73. Tyler L. K., Marslen-Wilson W. D., Rentoul J., Hanney P. Continuous and discontinuous access in spoken word-recognition: The role of derivational prefixes. Journal of Memory and Language. 27:1988;368-381.
74. Vroomen J., de Gelder B. Activation of embedded words in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23:1997;710-720.
75. Wurm L. H. Auditory processing of prefixed English words. 1996;State Univ. of New York at Stony Brook.
76. Wurm L. H. Auditory processing of prefixed English words is both continuous and decompositional. Journal of Memory and Language. 37:1997;438-461.