A fast algorithm for parallel model combination for noisy speech recognition

Computer Speech and Language

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 81-100

  Hwang, Tai Hwei ^a   Wang, Hsiao Chuan ^b  

^a INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009588268     PISSN: 08852308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/csla.2000.0137     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Boll, S. F. (1979). Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 27, 113-120.
2. Carlson, B. A. & Clements, M. A. (1994). A projection-based likelihood measure for speech recognition in noise. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 2, 97-102.
3. Davis, S. B. & Mermelstein, P. (1980). Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 28, 357-366.
4. Gales, M. J. F. (1998). Predictive model-based compensation schemes for robust speech recognition. Speech Communication, 25, 49-74.
5. Gales, M. J. F. & Woodland, P. C. (1996). Mean and variance adaptation within the MLLR framework. Computer Speech and Language, 10, 249-264.
6. Gales, M. J. F. & Young, S. J. (1993). Cepstral parameter compensation for HMM recognition in noise. Speech Communication, 12, 231-239.
7. Gales, M. J. F. & Young, S. J. (1995). A fast and flexible implementation of parallel model combination. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 95, Detroit, MI, pp. 133-136.
8. Gong, Y (1995). Speech recognition in noisy environments: A survey. Speech Communication, 16, 261-291.
9. Hwang, T. H., Lee, L. M. & Wang, H. C. (1997a). Feature adaptation using deviation vector for robust speech recognition in noisy environment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 97, Munich, Germany, pp. 1227-1230.
10. Hwang, T. H. & Wang, H. C. (1997b). Adaptation scheme for hidden Markov models in noisy speech recognition. Electronic Letters, 33, 257-258.
11. Juang, B. H. (1991). Speech recognition in adverse environments. Computer Speech and Language, 5, 275-294.
12. Komori, Y, Kosaka, T., Yamamoto, H. & Yamada, M. (1997). Fast parallel model combination noise adaptation processing. Proceedings of Eurospeech 97, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 1523-1526.
13. Lee, C. H., Lin, C. H. & Juang, B. H. (1991). A study on speaker adaptation of the parameters of continuous density hidden Markov models. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 39, 806-814.
14. Mansour, D. & Juang, B. H. (1989a). The short-time modified coherence representation and noisy speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 37, 795-804.
15. Mansour, D. & Juang, B. H. (1989b). A family of distortion measures based upon projection operation for robust speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 37, 1659-1671.
16. Varga, A. & Steeneken, H. J. M. (1993). Assessment for automatic speech recognition: II. NOISEX-92: A database and an experiment to study the effect of additive noise on speech recognition systems. Speech Communication, 12, 247-251.
17. Vaseghi, S. V. & Milner, B. P. (1991). Noisy speech recognition based on HMM's, Wiener filters and re-evaluation of most likely candidates. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 91, Toronto, Canada, volume II, pp. 103-106.
18. Vaseghi, S. V. & Milner, B. P. (1993). Noise-adaptive hidden Markov models based on Wiener filters. Proceedings of Eurospeech 93, Berlin, Germany, pp. 1023-1026.
19. Yuo, K. H. & Wang, H. C. (1998). Robust features derived from temporal trajectory filtering for speech recognition under the corruption of additive and convolutional noises. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 98, Washington, U.S.A., pp. 577-580.