|
Volumn 17, Issue 62, 2001, Pages 34-50
|
Ordering life: law and the normalization of biotechnology.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
BIOTECHNOLOGY;
CHILD PARENT RELATION;
DIAMOND V. CHAKRABARTY;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
INFERTILITY THERAPY;
JOHNSON V. CALVERT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
MOORE V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
MOTHER;
PATENT;
POLITICS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SCIENCE;
TRANSGENIC ORGANISM;
UNITED STATES;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
DIAMOND V. CHAKRABARTY;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
JOHNSON V. CALVERT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MOORE V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH;
BIOTECHNOLOGY;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
ORGANISMS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED;
PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS;
PATENTS;
POLITICS;
REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SCIENCE;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
SURROGATE MOTHERS;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0009584431
PISSN: 11282401
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (18)
|
References (0)
|