Iopentol (Imagopaque® 300) compared with iohexol (Omnipaque® 300) and diatrizoate (Urografin® 292) in pediatric urography: A clinical trial assessing adverse events and diagnostic information

European Radiology

Volumn 7, Issue SUPPL. 4, 1997, Pages

  Lanning, P ^a   Brekke, O ^b  

^a OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b NYCOMED IMAGING AS   (Norway)

Author keywords

Children; Contrast media; Infants; Urography

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DIATRIZOATE; IODOBENZOIC ACID DERIVATIVE; IOHEXOL; IOPENTOL;

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAFETY; UROGRAPHY;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIATRIZOATE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; IOHEXOL; MALE; SAFETY; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS; UROGRAPHY;

EID: 0009481903     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/pl00006876     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Heywood R, Mayfield R, Allan JA, Michelet ÅA (1987) Experimental urography with new non-ionic dimeric and monomeric contrast agents. In: Boijsen E, Kormano M (eds) Iopentol. Chemistry, toxicology and pharmacology of a non-ionic contrast medium. Acta Radiol [Suppl] 370: 45-48
2. Holtz E, Golman K (1987) Albuminuria following nephroangiography with low osmolar contrast media in the rat. In: Boijsen E, Kormano M (eds) Iopentol. Chemistry, toxicology and pharmacology of a non-ionic contrast medium. Acta Radiol [Suppl] 370: 49-56
3. Andrew E, Sveen K, Lambrechts M, Lillevold PE (1990) Total iopentol profile - overall results from clinical trials. In: Lærum F, Kendall B (eds) Iopentol. Clinical trials with a new non-ionic contrast medium. Excerpta Medica Int Congr Series 909. Elsevier, Amsterdam New York Oxford, pp 189-197
4. Rasmussen F, Dyreborg U, Larsen C, Waaler A, Kristoffersen DT (1990) Iopentol in urography. A randomized, double blind study, versus iohexol. In: Lærum F, Kendall B (eds) Iopentol. Clinical trials with a new non-ionic contrast medium. Excerpta Medica Int Congr Series 909. Elsevier, Amsterdam New York Oxford, pp 105-109
5. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 175: 621-628
6. Jacobsson BF, Jorulf H, Kalantar MS, Narasimham DL (1988) Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography. Clinical trial in 1000 consecutive patients. Radiology 167: 601-605
7. Brismar J, Jacobsson BF, Jorulf H (1991) Miscellaneous adverse effects of low- versus high-osmolality contrast media: a study revised. Radiology 179: 19-23
8. Cohen MD (1993) A review of the toxicity of nonionic contrast agents in children. Invest Radiol 28[Suppl 5]:S87-S93
9. Wiklund LM, Brolin I, Sjøholm K (1994) Non-ionic contrast media in pediatric CT. A comparative study of intravenous use of iopentol and iohexol. Acta Radiol 35: 1-5
10. Nybonde T, Wahlgren H, Brekke O, Kristoffersen DT, Mortensson W (1994) Image quality and safety in pediatric urography using an ionic and a non-ionic iodinated contrast agent. Pediatr Radiol 24: 107-110
11. Magill HL, Clarke EA, Fitch SJ et al. (1986) Excretory urography with iohexol: Evaluation in children. Radiology 161: 625-630
12. Meradji M, Ben Gershôm E (1984) Excretory urography with four different contrast media: Radiological and biochemical trials in 295 young infants. Ann Radiol 27: 199-206
13. Stake G (1989) Contrast media in pediatric radiology. Safety aspects. In: Enge I, Edgren J (eds) Patient safety and adverse events in contrast medium examinations. Excerpta Medica Int Congr Series 816. Elsevier, Amsterdam New York Oxford, pp 159-167
14. Winkielman J, Brunier E (1987) Iohexol in excretory urography. In: Kaufmann HJ (ed) Contrast media in pediatric radiology. Karger, Basel, pp 55-58